FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2055469306> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2055469306 endingPage "638" @default.
• W2055469306 startingPage "635" @default.
• W2055469306 abstract "No AccessJournal of UrologyAdult Urology1 Aug 2013Low Risk of Sexual Dysfunction After Transection and Nontransection Urethroplasty for Bulbar Urethral Stricture Teresa O. Ekerhult, Klas Lindqvist, Ralph Peeker, and Lars Grenabo Teresa O. EkerhultTeresa O. Ekerhult More articles by this author , Klas LindqvistKlas Lindqvist More articles by this author , Ralph PeekerRalph Peeker More articles by this author , and Lars GrenaboLars Grenabo More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.075AboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract Purpose: Open urethroplasty is the preferred treatment for recurrent bulbar urethral stricture. However, there are still some controversies regarding the optimal technique and the consequences of transecting the urethra in terms of sexual dysfunction, such as erectile dysfunction, penile shortening, impaired glans filling, decreased glans sensibility and ejaculatory function. We performed a retrospective analysis with long-term followup of anastomotic and substitution onlay urethroplasty in bulbar strictures with an emphasis on postoperative sexual function. Materials and Methods: A total of 169 patients with bulbar stricture were treated with urethroplasty via the onlay technique (75) or resection followed by end-to-end anastomosis (94) during 1999 to 2009. Mean followup in the transection and onlay groups was 41 and 69 months, respectively (range 12 to 132). All patients were asked verbally about sexual function during followup. Failure was defined as the need for new surgical intervention. Results: Erectile dysfunction developed in 1 patient (1%) per group. In the transection group 5 patients (5%), including 4 with longer and more distal strictures, had penile shortening/downward angulation. However, this did not interfere with sexual ability during intercourse. No patient reported impaired glans or ejaculatory function. The success rate in the transection and onlay groups was 91% and 71%, respectively. Conclusions: Transection with resection and end-to-end anastomosis is a good method for bulbar stricture with a low rate of sexual dysfunction and a high success rate postoperatively. To avoid penile angulation/shortening, it might be wise to use the onlay technique for longer and distal strictures. References 1 : Internal urethrotomy in the management of anterior urethral strictures: long-term followup. J Urol1996; 156: 73. Link, Google Scholar 2 : Treatment of male urethral strictures: is repeated dilation or internal urethrotomy useful?. J Urol1998; 160: 356. Link, Google Scholar 3 : Primary urethral reconstruction: the cost minimized approach to the bulbous urethral stricture. J Urol2005; 173: 1206. Link, Google Scholar 4 : Urethral strictures. BJU Int2011; 107: 6. Google Scholar 5 : Anterior urethral strictures: a brief review of the current surgical treatment. Urol Int2011; 86: 1. Google Scholar 6 : What is the best technique for urethroplasty?. Eur Urol2008; 54: 1031. Google Scholar 7 : Dorsal onlay skin graft bulbar urethroplasty: long-term follow-up. Eur Urol2008; 53: 628. Google Scholar 8 : Stricture recurrence after urethroplasty: a systematic review. J Urol2009; 182: 1266. Link, Google Scholar 9 : Results and complications of urethroplasty and its future. Br J Urol1993; 71: 322. Google Scholar 10 : Erectile function, sexual drive, and ejaculatory function after reconstructive surgery for anterior urethral stricture disease. BJU Int2007; 99: 607. Google Scholar 11 : Prospective analysis of erectile dysfunction after anterior urethroplasty: incidence and recovery of function. J Urol2010; 183: 657. Link, Google Scholar 12 : Patient satisfaction with the outcome of surgery for urethral stricture. J Urol2002; 167: 2507. Link, Google Scholar 13 : Anterior urethroplasty and effects on sexual life: which is the best technique?. Minerva Urol Nefrol2010; 62: 371. Google Scholar 14 : Long-term followup of bulbar end-to-end anastomosis: a retrospective analysis of 153 patients in a single center experience. J Urol2007; 178: 2470. Link, Google Scholar 15 : Prospective analysis of ejaculatory function after anterior urethral reconstruction. J Urol2010; 184: 238. Link, Google Scholar 16 : Anastomotic urethroplasty for bulbar urethral stricture: analysis of 168 patients. J Urol2002; 167: 1715. Link, Google Scholar 17 : Development and evaluation of an abridged, 5-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) as a diagnostic tool for erectile dysfunction. Int J Impot Res1999; 11: 319. Google Scholar 18 : The effect of bulbar urethroplasty on erectile function. J Urol2007; 178: 1009. Link, Google Scholar 19 : End-to-end urethroplasty: long-term results. BJU Int2002; 90: 68. Google Scholar 20 : Long-term followup for excision and primary anastomosis for anterior urethral strictures. J Urol2007; 177: 1803. Link, Google Scholar 21 : Anastomotic urethroplasty. BJU Int2005; 96: 921. Google Scholar 22 : Outcome of end-to-end urethroplasty: single-center experience. Urol Int2009; 82: 179. Google Scholar 23 : One-stage bulbar urethroplasty: retrospective analysis of the results in 375 patients. Eur Urol2008; 53: 828. Google Scholar 24 : Dorsal onlay graft urethroplasty using penile skin or buccal mucosa for repair of bulbar urethral stricture: results of a prospective single center study. Eur Urol2005; 48: 1013. Google Scholar 25 : The vascularized skin island urethroplasty: its role and results in urethral stricture management. J Urol1985; 133: 31. Link, Google Scholar Department of Urology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden© 2013 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited ByAnderson K, Vanni A, Erickson B, Myers J, Voelzke B, Breyer B, Broghammer J, Buckley J, Zhao L, Smith T, Alsikafi N, Rourke K and Elliott S (2022) Defining Success after Anterior Urethroplasty: An Argument for a Universal Definition and Surveillance ProtocolJournal of Urology, VOL. 208, NO. 1, (135-143), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2022.Chapman D, Cotter K, Johnsen N, Patel S, Kinnaird A, Erickson B, Voelzke B, Buckley J and Rourke K (2019) Nontransecting Techniques Reduce Sexual Dysfunction after Anastomotic Bulbar Urethroplasty: Results of a Multi-Institutional Comparative AnalysisJournal of Urology, VOL. 201, NO. 2, (364-370), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2019. Volume 190Issue 2August 2013Page: 635-638 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2013 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.Keywordsurethrapostoperative complicationssexual dysfunction, physiologicalurethral stricturepenisMetricsAuthor Information Teresa O. Ekerhult More articles by this author Klas Lindqvist More articles by this author Ralph Peeker More articles by this author Lars Grenabo More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF DownloadLoading ..." @default.
• W2055469306 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2055469306 creator A5027948397 @default.
• W2055469306 creator A5056630312 @default.
• W2055469306 creator A5087022608 @default.
• W2055469306 creator A5088836842 @default.
• W2055469306 date "2013-08-01" @default.
• W2055469306 modified "2023-09-26" @default.
• W2055469306 title "Low Risk of Sexual Dysfunction After Transection and Nontransection Urethroplasty for Bulbar Urethral Stricture" @default.
• W2055469306 cites W1873708394 @default.
• W2055469306 cites W1970787196 @default.
• W2055469306 cites W1975576568 @default.
• W2055469306 cites W2000754074 @default.
• W2055469306 cites W2005438150 @default.
• W2055469306 cites W2013782672 @default.
• W2055469306 cites W2017817741 @default.
• W2055469306 cites W2026641917 @default.
• W2055469306 cites W2035335782 @default.
• W2055469306 cites W2041569478 @default.
• W2055469306 cites W2053299620 @default.
• W2055469306 cites W2055179169 @default.
• W2055469306 cites W2057997982 @default.
• W2055469306 cites W2064537914 @default.
• W2055469306 cites W2067753726 @default.
• W2055469306 cites W2088668822 @default.
• W2055469306 cites W2095057753 @default.
• W2055469306 cites W2115048894 @default.
• W2055469306 cites W2156014763 @default.
• W2055469306 cites W2156067661 @default.
• W2055469306 cites W2170810202 @default.
• W2055469306 cites W2297536191 @default.
• W2055469306 cites W2321163949 @default.
• W2055469306 cites W4252394973 @default.
• W2055469306 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.075" @default.
• W2055469306 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23485502" @default.
• W2055469306 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W2055469306 type Work @default.
• W2055469306 sameAs 2055469306 @default.
• W2055469306 citedByCount "22" @default.
• W2055469306 countsByYear W20554693062015 @default.
• W2055469306 countsByYear W20554693062016 @default.
• W2055469306 countsByYear W20554693062017 @default.
• W2055469306 countsByYear W20554693062018 @default.
• W2055469306 countsByYear W20554693062019 @default.
• W2055469306 countsByYear W20554693062020 @default.
• W2055469306 countsByYear W20554693062021 @default.
• W2055469306 countsByYear W20554693062022 @default.
• W2055469306 countsByYear W20554693062023 @default.
• W2055469306 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2055469306 hasAuthorship W2055469306A5027948397 @default.
• W2055469306 hasAuthorship W2055469306A5056630312 @default.
• W2055469306 hasAuthorship W2055469306A5087022608 @default.
• W2055469306 hasAuthorship W2055469306A5088836842 @default.
• W2055469306 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2055469306 hasConcept C126894567 @default.
• W2055469306 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2055469306 hasConcept C2775871022 @default.
• W2055469306 hasConcept C2777050469 @default.
• W2055469306 hasConcept C2777085111 @default.
• W2055469306 hasConcept C2777786686 @default.
• W2055469306 hasConcept C2778093883 @default.
• W2055469306 hasConcept C2778655861 @default.
• W2055469306 hasConcept C2778841284 @default.
• W2055469306 hasConcept C2779929075 @default.
• W2055469306 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2055469306 hasConcept C8443397 @default.
• W2055469306 hasConceptScore W2055469306C126322002 @default.
• W2055469306 hasConceptScore W2055469306C126894567 @default.
• W2055469306 hasConceptScore W2055469306C141071460 @default.
• W2055469306 hasConceptScore W2055469306C2775871022 @default.
• W2055469306 hasConceptScore W2055469306C2777050469 @default.
• W2055469306 hasConceptScore W2055469306C2777085111 @default.
• W2055469306 hasConceptScore W2055469306C2777786686 @default.
• W2055469306 hasConceptScore W2055469306C2778093883 @default.
• W2055469306 hasConceptScore W2055469306C2778655861 @default.
• W2055469306 hasConceptScore W2055469306C2778841284 @default.
• W2055469306 hasConceptScore W2055469306C2779929075 @default.
• W2055469306 hasConceptScore W2055469306C71924100 @default.
• W2055469306 hasConceptScore W2055469306C8443397 @default.
• W2055469306 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2055469306 hasLocation W20554693061 @default.
• W2055469306 hasLocation W20554693062 @default.
• W2055469306 hasOpenAccess W2055469306 @default.
• W2055469306 hasPrimaryLocation W20554693061 @default.
• W2055469306 hasRelatedWork W2055469306 @default.
• W2055469306 hasRelatedWork W2070953874 @default.
• W2055469306 hasRelatedWork W2074779194 @default.
• W2055469306 hasRelatedWork W2133961263 @default.
• W2055469306 hasRelatedWork W2373091722 @default.
• W2055469306 hasRelatedWork W2416181456 @default.
• W2055469306 hasRelatedWork W2418374959 @default.
• W2055469306 hasRelatedWork W2766478073 @default.
• W2055469306 hasRelatedWork W3030792074 @default.
• W2055469306 hasRelatedWork W3032832970 @default.
• W2055469306 hasVolume "190" @default.
• W2055469306 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2055469306 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2055469306 magId "2055469306" @default.

• next