FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2055953735> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2055953735 endingPage "16" @default.
• W2055953735 startingPage "11" @default.
• W2055953735 abstract "Market-based approaches to conservation provide two novel policy outcomes. First, they secure public environmental benefits through incentive payments to private landowners to deliver those conservation outcomes that are unlikely to be achieved through regulation. Second, they provide opportunities to influence perceptions, motivations and values, and shift behaviors among landowners towards biodiversity conservation. Here we report on our experiences in engaging private landowners through two large market-based conservation programs funded by the Australian government. The Forest Conservation Fund was run in Tasmania from 2006 to 2009 and protected over 28,000 ha of high conservation value forests through contracts with over 125 landowners. The Environmental Stewardship Program was run in temperate south eastern Australia from 2008, targets nationally endangered ecological communities and has so far secured over 45,000 ha through contracts with over 260 landowners to improve habitat condition. In total these two programs have, at various stages in their implementation, engaged with over 1400 landowners. Participating landowners benefited from their engagement in three major ways. Firstly, landowner appreciation that their land had both production and commercial conservation values grew, as did their interest in better understanding these values and their measurement. Secondly, was the flow of information to build capacity through improved awareness, knowledge transfers and skills development. Effective landholder engagement was strengthened by targeted communications and information support. Landowners received detailed information on the ecology of their properties, and workshops and on-site field surveys provided practical exposure that filled a conservation information and extension void. Some landowners who had been unsuccessful in bidding for funding said they would change aspects of their land management because of what they learned. Thirdly was a group of benefits associated with property planning and management. The competitive and commercial nature of these two programs prompted many landholders to think more about the mix of revenue and cost drivers for their enterprise, and in particular those associated with new conservation market opportunities. Participation encouraged many landholders to redesign their properties into production and conservation zones that supported improved management for both productive and conservation outcomes. These observations suggest that participation in market-based conservation programs encourage social learning and build social capital in ways that can facilitate additional positive biodiversity outcomes on private land. The effectiveness of biodiversity conservation policies and programs would be strengthened by the inclusion of specific social outcomes." @default.
• W2055953735 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2055953735 creator A5013423223 @default.
• W2055953735 date "2013-03-01" @default.
• W2055953735 modified "2023-10-03" @default.
• W2055953735 title "Landowners and conservation markets: Social benefits from two Australian government programs" @default.
• W2055953735 cites W1597574239 @default.
• W2055953735 cites W1790739296 @default.
• W2055953735 cites W1977561990 @default.
• W2055953735 cites W1979995047 @default.
• W2055953735 cites W1988851447 @default.
• W2055953735 cites W1994255297 @default.
• W2055953735 cites W2001936362 @default.
• W2055953735 cites W2009229993 @default.
• W2055953735 cites W2031036136 @default.
• W2055953735 cites W2053121175 @default.
• W2055953735 cites W2066975439 @default.
• W2055953735 cites W2071040227 @default.
• W2055953735 cites W2075605817 @default.
• W2055953735 cites W2076336850 @default.
• W2055953735 cites W2082028289 @default.
• W2055953735 cites W2083726540 @default.
• W2055953735 cites W2085303201 @default.
• W2055953735 cites W2102213445 @default.
• W2055953735 cites W2145059958 @default.
• W2055953735 cites W2153590444 @default.
• W2055953735 cites W2162700830 @default.
• W2055953735 cites W2170010010 @default.
• W2055953735 cites W2170822636 @default.
• W2055953735 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.01.011" @default.
• W2055953735 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W2055953735 type Work @default.
• W2055953735 sameAs 2055953735 @default.
• W2055953735 citedByCount "46" @default.
• W2055953735 countsByYear W20559537352013 @default.
• W2055953735 countsByYear W20559537352014 @default.
• W2055953735 countsByYear W20559537352015 @default.
• W2055953735 countsByYear W20559537352016 @default.
• W2055953735 countsByYear W20559537352017 @default.
• W2055953735 countsByYear W20559537352018 @default.
• W2055953735 countsByYear W20559537352019 @default.
• W2055953735 countsByYear W20559537352020 @default.
• W2055953735 countsByYear W20559537352021 @default.
• W2055953735 countsByYear W20559537352022 @default.
• W2055953735 countsByYear W20559537352023 @default.
• W2055953735 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2055953735 hasAuthorship W2055953735A5013423223 @default.
• W2055953735 hasConcept C10138342 @default.
• W2055953735 hasConcept C107826830 @default.
• W2055953735 hasConcept C118518473 @default.
• W2055953735 hasConcept C137607661 @default.
• W2055953735 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2055953735 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2055953735 hasConcept C145097563 @default.
• W2055953735 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2055953735 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W2055953735 hasConcept C175444787 @default.
• W2055953735 hasConcept C175605778 @default.
• W2055953735 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2055953735 hasConcept C179345059 @default.
• W2055953735 hasConcept C179530779 @default.
• W2055953735 hasConcept C185933670 @default.
• W2055953735 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W2055953735 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2055953735 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W2055953735 hasConcept C206345919 @default.
• W2055953735 hasConcept C2777738643 @default.
• W2055953735 hasConcept C2777950569 @default.
• W2055953735 hasConcept C2778137410 @default.
• W2055953735 hasConcept C29122968 @default.
• W2055953735 hasConcept C31258907 @default.
• W2055953735 hasConcept C3859990 @default.
• W2055953735 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2055953735 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2055953735 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2055953735 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W2055953735 hasConceptScore W2055953735C10138342 @default.
• W2055953735 hasConceptScore W2055953735C107826830 @default.
• W2055953735 hasConceptScore W2055953735C118518473 @default.
• W2055953735 hasConceptScore W2055953735C137607661 @default.
• W2055953735 hasConceptScore W2055953735C138885662 @default.
• W2055953735 hasConceptScore W2055953735C144133560 @default.
• W2055953735 hasConceptScore W2055953735C145097563 @default.
• W2055953735 hasConceptScore W2055953735C162324750 @default.
• W2055953735 hasConceptScore W2055953735C166957645 @default.
• W2055953735 hasConceptScore W2055953735C175444787 @default.
• W2055953735 hasConceptScore W2055953735C175605778 @default.
• W2055953735 hasConceptScore W2055953735C17744445 @default.
• W2055953735 hasConceptScore W2055953735C179345059 @default.
• W2055953735 hasConceptScore W2055953735C179530779 @default.
• W2055953735 hasConceptScore W2055953735C185933670 @default.
• W2055953735 hasConceptScore W2055953735C18903297 @default.
• W2055953735 hasConceptScore W2055953735C199539241 @default.
• W2055953735 hasConceptScore W2055953735C205649164 @default.
• W2055953735 hasConceptScore W2055953735C206345919 @default.
• W2055953735 hasConceptScore W2055953735C2777738643 @default.
• W2055953735 hasConceptScore W2055953735C2777950569 @default.
• W2055953735 hasConceptScore W2055953735C2778137410 @default.

• next