FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2056556484> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2056556484 abstract "Application of Modern NMR Logging for Mixed-Lithology Carbonate Reservoirs (A Case Study) P.E. Syngaevsky; P.E. Syngaevsky Sperry-Sun (Halliburton) Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar S.F. Khafizov S.F. Khafizov Tyumen Oil Company (TNK) Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Paper presented at the Canadian International Petroleum Conference, Calgary, Alberta, June 2003. Paper Number: PETSOC-2003-016 https://doi.org/10.2118/2003-016 Published: June 10 2003 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Get Permissions Search Site Citation Syngaevsky, P.E., and S.F. Khafizov. Application of Modern NMR Logging for Mixed-Lithology Carbonate Reservoirs (A Case Study). Paper presented at the Canadian International Petroleum Conference, Calgary, Alberta, June 2003. doi: https://doi.org/10.2118/2003-016 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex Search nav search search input Search input auto suggest search filter All ContentAll ProceedingsPetroleum Society of CanadaPETSOC Canadian International Petroleum Conference Search Advanced Search AbstractThe following is the presentation of two field examples of NMR logs in carbonate reservoirs with low porosity and permeability. The wells were drilled with WBM in Devonian (D2-D3) carbonate sequences at Orenburg district (Russia). Conventional open-hole logs fail to recognize pay zones. The NMR measurements allow identification of vuggy and inter-granular porosity; however, several problems occur with calculated permeability. Presence of clastic tongues in fore-reef facies provides multiple challenges for advanced formation evaluation. Core data suggested presence of oil-saturated reservoir quality rocks with subsequent testing indicating commercial flow. Modified version of Coates permeability model have been used to match the testing results.NMR method should not be used as a replacement for any porosity logs in reservoirs with mixed lithology. Modern tools provide spectral porosity distribution that includes signal from hydrocarbons. Interaction of the formation fluids with pore surfaces can significantly influence relaxation response hence, a good knowledge of reservoir geology and lithology is a requirement for interpretation in carbonate reservoirs.IntroductionAssessment of productivity in carbonates from well log data traditionally presents challenging and complex problem (3,7). Most reliable information about permeability comes from well test results performed by formation testers and pressure transient analysis (8). NMR technology has made a great impact on open-hole formation evaluation; and it has also receives a lot of professional attention, as well as advertising. Unfortunately, benefits of NMR application in carbonate reservoirs are coming hand-by-hand with serious danger of potential misinterpretation. Often it leads to faulty interpretations or other mistakes commonly blamed on the method. Although suggested for a long time as a lithology-independent porosity and as a unique permeability measurement NMR in reality appears to be neither. T2 interpretation remains uncertain in the case of mixed lithology, were none of previously suggested cutoff values produce a reliable results, or when geological conditions break a correlation between surface-to-volume ratio and permeability.In 2001–02 this technique has been successfully applied in several sedimentary basins in Kazakhstan and Russia (Orenburg district), where complex predominantly carbonate sequences contretemps conventional logs interpretation. Vugs, which are defined as pores larger that adjacent grains (3), are common here, but not readily recognized on conventional data. The main purpose of this study was to describe the experience that was gained so far, and spot and indicate limitations of current NMR technology illustrating them with two field examples.GEOLOGY AND GENERAL SETTINGSVarious reef mounds are pretty common across the flanks of Kamsko-Kinelsky Depression (Orenburg District, Russia). Typically, four major zones of deposition are recognized there: back reef, reef flat/crust, front and fore reef. Within those zones up to ten various lithofacies could be identified on cores and logs. Presence of clastic reservoirs on the external side (fore-reef) was noticed in several oil fields. Some contradiction exists on their origin; whether they were formed by active channels running seaward between the reefs or were a result of shallow basin turbidite deposition (fig 1). Keywords: carbonate reservoir, limestone, formation evaluation, lithology, permeability, porosity, information, nmr, orenburg district, well logging Subjects: Formation Evaluation & Management, Open hole/cased hole log analysis This content is only available via PDF. 2003. Petroleum Society of Canada You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download." @default.
• W2056556484 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2056556484 creator A5040609782 @default.
• W2056556484 creator A5044766321 @default.
• W2056556484 date "2003-01-01" @default.
• W2056556484 modified "2023-10-04" @default.
• W2056556484 title "Application of Modern NMR Logging for Mixed-Lithology Carbonate Reservoirs (A Case Study)" @default.
• W2056556484 doi "https://doi.org/10.2118/2003-016" @default.
• W2056556484 hasPublicationYear "2003" @default.
• W2056556484 type Work @default.
• W2056556484 sameAs 2056556484 @default.
• W2056556484 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2056556484 countsByYear W20565564842017 @default.
• W2056556484 crossrefType "proceedings-article" @default.
• W2056556484 hasAuthorship W2056556484A5040609782 @default.
• W2056556484 hasAuthorship W2056556484A5044766321 @default.
• W2056556484 hasConcept C109007969 @default.
• W2056556484 hasConcept C122792734 @default.
• W2056556484 hasConcept C125620115 @default.
• W2056556484 hasConcept C127313418 @default.
• W2056556484 hasConcept C146588470 @default.
• W2056556484 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W2056556484 hasConcept C161191863 @default.
• W2056556484 hasConcept C16674752 @default.
• W2056556484 hasConcept C17409809 @default.
• W2056556484 hasConcept C191897082 @default.
• W2056556484 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W2056556484 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W2056556484 hasConcept C2778805511 @default.
• W2056556484 hasConcept C2780659211 @default.
• W2056556484 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2056556484 hasConcept C97137747 @default.
• W2056556484 hasConceptScore W2056556484C109007969 @default.
• W2056556484 hasConceptScore W2056556484C122792734 @default.
• W2056556484 hasConceptScore W2056556484C125620115 @default.
• W2056556484 hasConceptScore W2056556484C127313418 @default.
• W2056556484 hasConceptScore W2056556484C146588470 @default.
• W2056556484 hasConceptScore W2056556484C151730666 @default.
• W2056556484 hasConceptScore W2056556484C161191863 @default.
• W2056556484 hasConceptScore W2056556484C16674752 @default.
• W2056556484 hasConceptScore W2056556484C17409809 @default.
• W2056556484 hasConceptScore W2056556484C191897082 @default.
• W2056556484 hasConceptScore W2056556484C192562407 @default.
• W2056556484 hasConceptScore W2056556484C205649164 @default.
• W2056556484 hasConceptScore W2056556484C2778805511 @default.
• W2056556484 hasConceptScore W2056556484C2780659211 @default.
• W2056556484 hasConceptScore W2056556484C41008148 @default.
• W2056556484 hasConceptScore W2056556484C97137747 @default.
• W2056556484 hasLocation W20565564841 @default.
• W2056556484 hasOpenAccess W2056556484 @default.
• W2056556484 hasPrimaryLocation W20565564841 @default.
• W2056556484 hasRelatedWork W1966695987 @default.
• W2056556484 hasRelatedWork W1989828194 @default.
• W2056556484 hasRelatedWork W2015378880 @default.
• W2056556484 hasRelatedWork W2102899705 @default.
• W2056556484 hasRelatedWork W2270435221 @default.
• W2056556484 hasRelatedWork W2357276346 @default.
• W2056556484 hasRelatedWork W2363299297 @default.
• W2056556484 hasRelatedWork W2384347468 @default.
• W2056556484 hasRelatedWork W2392482295 @default.
• W2056556484 hasRelatedWork W4240148634 @default.
• W2056556484 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2056556484 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2056556484 magId "2056556484" @default.
• W2056556484 workType "article" @default.