FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2056758477> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2056758477 abstract "We read with interest the well-written best evidence topic by Reeb and colleagues, about the use of daily routine chest radiographs as compared to on-demand strategy after pulmonary surgery [1]. authors concluded that daily radiographs could be foregone, because the on-demand strategy has a better impact on management and has not proven to negatively affect outcomes, even if prospective and randomized trials are necessary to improve the current level of evidence.We would like to add some comment on this important topic.In their overview, the authors listed the important prospective study by Cerfolio and Bryant [2]. In his related commentary [3], Michael Lanuti wrote: The authors observed that chest roentgenograms changed clinical management in 72% (49 of 62) of patients exhibiting hypoxia during their hospitalization, thus justifying the need for chest radiography. In contrast, only 27% (268 of 975) of patients required an alteration in clinical management in the absence of hypoxia. […] One could argue that because a chest roentgenogram changed clinical management in nonhypoxic patients nearly one third (27%) of the time, daily chest radiography remains beneficial. According to these data, Lanuti suggested to start a simple prospective randomized controlled trial to improve the level of evidence.Recently, Goudie and colleagues evaluated chest sonography in postoperative care, and found it to be a possibility to reduce the number of chest radiographs [4]. conclusion of this prospective trial was that chest sonography is an effective, convenient, inexpensive and easy to learn tool in the postoperative management of thoracic surgery patients.In our opinion, the use of chest sonography could be an alternative way to promote a reduction of postoperative chest radiographs, without the risk of delaying a change in management.Today, cost saving is an important goal, but it would be better to save money without sacrificing quality or reducing safety: according to the IDEAL recommendations [5], we believe that any change in postoperative management of surgical patients should be evaluated with the best possible evidence.Conflict of interest: none declared." @default.
• W2056758477 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2056758477 creator A5060732131 @default.
• W2056758477 creator A5087649056 @default.
• W2056758477 date "2013-11-15" @default.
• W2056758477 modified "2023-10-03" @default.
• W2056758477 title "eComment. Chest sonography could reduce routine chest radiographs after pulmonary surgery" @default.
• W2056758477 cites W1976576973 @default.
• W2056758477 cites W2104983351 @default.
• W2056758477 cites W2157652631 @default.
• W2056758477 cites W4210650630 @default.
• W2056758477 cites W2121095932 @default.
• W2056758477 doi "https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivt417" @default.
• W2056758477 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/3829514" @default.
• W2056758477 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24243949" @default.
• W2056758477 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W2056758477 type Work @default.
• W2056758477 sameAs 2056758477 @default.
• W2056758477 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2056758477 countsByYear W20567584772019 @default.
• W2056758477 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2056758477 hasAuthorship W2056758477A5060732131 @default.
• W2056758477 hasAuthorship W2056758477A5087649056 @default.
• W2056758477 hasBestOaLocation W20567584771 @default.
• W2056758477 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2056758477 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2056758477 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2056758477 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2056758477 hasConcept C188816634 @default.
• W2056758477 hasConcept C36454342 @default.
• W2056758477 hasConcept C535046627 @default.
• W2056758477 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2056758477 hasConceptScore W2056758477C126322002 @default.
• W2056758477 hasConceptScore W2056758477C126838900 @default.
• W2056758477 hasConceptScore W2056758477C141071460 @default.
• W2056758477 hasConceptScore W2056758477C168563851 @default.
• W2056758477 hasConceptScore W2056758477C188816634 @default.
• W2056758477 hasConceptScore W2056758477C36454342 @default.
• W2056758477 hasConceptScore W2056758477C535046627 @default.
• W2056758477 hasConceptScore W2056758477C71924100 @default.
• W2056758477 hasLocation W20567584771 @default.
• W2056758477 hasLocation W20567584772 @default.
• W2056758477 hasLocation W20567584773 @default.
• W2056758477 hasLocation W20567584774 @default.
• W2056758477 hasOpenAccess W2056758477 @default.
• W2056758477 hasPrimaryLocation W20567584771 @default.
• W2056758477 hasRelatedWork W1975157033 @default.
• W2056758477 hasRelatedWork W1982832717 @default.
• W2056758477 hasRelatedWork W2001750883 @default.
• W2056758477 hasRelatedWork W2003225556 @default.
• W2056758477 hasRelatedWork W2028072170 @default.
• W2056758477 hasRelatedWork W2046881982 @default.
• W2056758477 hasRelatedWork W2059956073 @default.
• W2056758477 hasRelatedWork W2086309933 @default.
• W2056758477 hasRelatedWork W2167255167 @default.
• W2056758477 hasRelatedWork W2329322563 @default.
• W2056758477 hasRelatedWork W2404124793 @default.
• W2056758477 hasRelatedWork W2418610168 @default.
• W2056758477 hasRelatedWork W2421875998 @default.
• W2056758477 hasRelatedWork W2441117271 @default.
• W2056758477 hasRelatedWork W2462593021 @default.
• W2056758477 hasRelatedWork W2971920127 @default.
• W2056758477 hasRelatedWork W2997497797 @default.
• W2056758477 hasRelatedWork W3022598607 @default.
• W2056758477 hasRelatedWork W3137241634 @default.
• W2056758477 hasRelatedWork W2496896782 @default.
• W2056758477 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2056758477 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2056758477 magId "2056758477" @default.
• W2056758477 workType "article" @default.