FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2057006935> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2057006935 endingPage "352" @default.
• W2057006935 startingPage "349" @default.
• W2057006935 abstract "Economics studies the optimal allocation of resources for the production of benefits to the society. By definition, resources are limited, and healthcare systems must face this condition every day. This may explain why economic evaluations are increasingly used as a key component of decision making. For instance, they represent a mainstay in any Health Technology Assessment (HTA) exercise and are subject to a guidelines’ development process [1]. After the assessment of the efficacy and safety of health interventions, economic evaluations enter to compare alternative options in terms of costs and consequences. Full economic evaluations consist of a comparison of both costs (resource use) and consequences (outcomes, effects) of alternative strategies [2]. If Cochrane reviews are intended to help providers, practitioners and patients in making informed decisions about health care interventions, they cannot afford to ignore their economic aspects. Cochrane reviews assemble, select, critique and combine reliable data from multiple research studies on the effectiveness and other issues related to healthcare interventions. The latest version of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions [3], freely accessible at http://www.cochrane-hand book.org, acknowledges that incorporating economic perspectives and evidence into Cochrane reviews can enhance their usefulness and applicability for healthcare decisionmaking. An entire chapter (‘‘Incorporating economics evidence’’), provides guidance on how authors of systematic reviews can collect the best evidence on the economic aspects of interventions in addition to the best evidence on their clinical effectiveness [4]. A leading point here is to expand our knowledge on efficiency (optimal use of resources) after having established effectiveness (whether treatments work) [5]. The main types of full economic evaluations (costeffectiveness, cost-utility and cost-benefit analyses) compare alternative interventions in terms of both costs (resource use) and consequences (effects) and can be included in Cochrane reviews, as well as studies that only focus on costs and resource use, without comparing health alternatives, i.e. partial economic evaluations [4]. Cost-effectiveness analyses measure the effects of an intervention and its comparators in identical units of outcome (e.g. mortality), thus comparing them in terms of ‘cost per unit of effect’ [5]. In a cost-benefit analysis both resource use and effects of alternative interventions are G. Virgili (&) Department of Specialised Surgical Sciences, University of Florence and Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy e-mail: gianni.virgili@unifi.it" @default.
• W2057006935 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2057006935 creator A5001417870 @default.
• W2057006935 creator A5015954067 @default.
• W2057006935 creator A5049719722 @default.
• W2057006935 creator A5060169707 @default.
• W2057006935 creator A5085895825 @default.
• W2057006935 date "2010-07-06" @default.
• W2057006935 modified "2023-10-02" @default.
• W2057006935 title "Utilities and QALYs in health economic evaluations: glossary and introduction" @default.
• W2057006935 cites W1562754212 @default.
• W2057006935 cites W1593173821 @default.
• W2057006935 cites W1598602811 @default.
• W2057006935 cites W1963603000 @default.
• W2057006935 cites W1983073213 @default.
• W2057006935 cites W2013144056 @default.
• W2057006935 cites W2037843530 @default.
• W2057006935 cites W2087492375 @default.
• W2057006935 cites W2095095509 @default.
• W2057006935 cites W2098326270 @default.
• W2057006935 cites W2118437016 @default.
• W2057006935 cites W2131779687 @default.
• W2057006935 cites W2157117527 @default.
• W2057006935 doi "https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-010-0420-7" @default.
• W2057006935 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20607453" @default.
• W2057006935 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W2057006935 type Work @default.
• W2057006935 sameAs 2057006935 @default.
• W2057006935 citedByCount "9" @default.
• W2057006935 countsByYear W20570069352015 @default.
• W2057006935 countsByYear W20570069352016 @default.
• W2057006935 countsByYear W20570069352020 @default.
• W2057006935 countsByYear W20570069352022 @default.
• W2057006935 countsByYear W20570069352023 @default.
• W2057006935 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2057006935 hasAuthorship W2057006935A5001417870 @default.
• W2057006935 hasAuthorship W2057006935A5015954067 @default.
• W2057006935 hasAuthorship W2057006935A5049719722 @default.
• W2057006935 hasAuthorship W2057006935A5060169707 @default.
• W2057006935 hasAuthorship W2057006935A5085895825 @default.
• W2057006935 hasBestOaLocation W20570069351 @default.
• W2057006935 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2057006935 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2057006935 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2057006935 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
• W2057006935 hasConcept C2780031656 @default.
• W2057006935 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2057006935 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2057006935 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2057006935 hasConceptScore W2057006935C138885662 @default.
• W2057006935 hasConceptScore W2057006935C17744445 @default.
• W2057006935 hasConceptScore W2057006935C199539241 @default.
• W2057006935 hasConceptScore W2057006935C2779473830 @default.
• W2057006935 hasConceptScore W2057006935C2780031656 @default.
• W2057006935 hasConceptScore W2057006935C41895202 @default.
• W2057006935 hasConceptScore W2057006935C512399662 @default.
• W2057006935 hasConceptScore W2057006935C71924100 @default.
• W2057006935 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2057006935 hasLocation W20570069351 @default.
• W2057006935 hasLocation W20570069352 @default.
• W2057006935 hasOpenAccess W2057006935 @default.
• W2057006935 hasPrimaryLocation W20570069351 @default.
• W2057006935 hasRelatedWork W1904867238 @default.
• W2057006935 hasRelatedWork W2011583128 @default.
• W2057006935 hasRelatedWork W2059049454 @default.
• W2057006935 hasRelatedWork W2100501145 @default.
• W2057006935 hasRelatedWork W2143097464 @default.
• W2057006935 hasRelatedWork W2570231282 @default.
• W2057006935 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2057006935 hasRelatedWork W3003357671 @default.
• W2057006935 hasRelatedWork W4200224094 @default.
• W2057006935 hasRelatedWork W4324128567 @default.
• W2057006935 hasVolume "5" @default.
• W2057006935 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2057006935 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2057006935 magId "2057006935" @default.
• W2057006935 workType "article" @default.