FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2057712082> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2057712082 endingPage "160" @default.
• W2057712082 startingPage "143" @default.
• W2057712082 abstract "Human pain responsivity was defined as the subject's behavioral pain endurance time (PET) to the 1 ± 0.3°C cold-pressor test, a naturalistic and clinical analogue tonic pain model. Over the past 2 years, we have consistently observed a behavioral dichotomy of pain responsivity in each of our 6 studies (all at P < 0.000001 effect level), totaling 205 subjects. Overall, the pain-tolerant (PT) subjects could endure the whole 5 min (note that 3 min was the ceiling criterion in the last study) of cold-pressor test, while the pain-sensitive (PS) subjects could merely tolerate the test for an overall mean of 60 sec, 20% of PET in the PT group. No overlapping of distribution was observed between these 2 populations. Further, we observed that the percentage of subjects in each of these 2 groups varied substantially across studies. The mean pain perception (Visual Analogue Scale) of tonic pain ranged from 60–70 for both aversiveness and intensity scales. The characteristics of this tonic pain, assessed by the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), showed similar patterns across each study with a high degree of consistency. Although ratings of pain aversiveness did not differ in the PT vs. PS subjects, ratings of pain intensity did differ, with the PT subject reporting less pain. It was found that state anxiety correlated with MPQ scores for PS, but not PT, subjects. Additionally, psychological tests (Tellegen Absorbance Scale, Kleinknecht Fear, Spielberger Trait-Anxiety) were positively correlated with certain MPQ measures for PS, but not PT subjects. Multivariate regression analyses indicated, in the PS but not the PT group, that 36% of variance in pain score (MPQ-T) could be predicted by the psychological trait factors. The general level of fear contributed singularly as the major predictor variable in the pain-sensitive individuals. We consider this tonic pain model indeed offers a succinct empirical paradigm to study human pain responsivity in general. The psychological/physiological etiology of such drastic human pain responsivity requires intense systematic investigations. This report discusses the results in: (a) individual differences in pain responsivity, (b) characterization of the cold-pressor test as a model for tonic pain, (c) contrast between PS and PT groups of pain perception and state anxiety, and (d) psychological determinants of measures for cognitive, perceptual and affective domains. Discussion was also focused on the experimental tonic pain model and its generality for clinical pain, as well as the basic model of the cold-pressor test for human tonic pain responsivity." @default.
• W2057712082 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2057712082 creator A5012331452 @default.
• W2057712082 creator A5034397752 @default.
• W2057712082 creator A5052463350 @default.
• W2057712082 creator A5058257807 @default.
• W2057712082 date "1989-05-01" @default.
• W2057712082 modified "2023-10-15" @default.
• W2057712082 title "Human pain responsivity in a tonic pain model: Psychological determinants" @default.
• W2057712082 cites W1970318334 @default.
• W2057712082 cites W1972467784 @default.
• W2057712082 cites W1974079961 @default.
• W2057712082 cites W1976379052 @default.
• W2057712082 cites W1980354091 @default.
• W2057712082 cites W1980688647 @default.
• W2057712082 cites W1981168295 @default.
• W2057712082 cites W1986286560 @default.
• W2057712082 cites W1988130989 @default.
• W2057712082 cites W1991242046 @default.
• W2057712082 cites W1991655960 @default.
• W2057712082 cites W1999404086 @default.
• W2057712082 cites W2000835897 @default.
• W2057712082 cites W2011882454 @default.
• W2057712082 cites W2019477923 @default.
• W2057712082 cites W2022459033 @default.
• W2057712082 cites W2037723271 @default.
• W2057712082 cites W2049780607 @default.
• W2057712082 cites W2054287930 @default.
• W2057712082 cites W2062341615 @default.
• W2057712082 cites W2081776574 @default.
• W2057712082 cites W2083737567 @default.
• W2057712082 cites W2084518320 @default.
• W2057712082 cites W2157229230 @default.
• W2057712082 cites W4233445471 @default.
• W2057712082 cites W4240197617 @default.
• W2057712082 cites W4301009026 @default.
• W2057712082 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(89)90126-7" @default.
• W2057712082 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2664663" @default.
• W2057712082 hasPublicationYear "1989" @default.
• W2057712082 type Work @default.
• W2057712082 sameAs 2057712082 @default.
• W2057712082 citedByCount "238" @default.
• W2057712082 countsByYear W20577120822012 @default.
• W2057712082 countsByYear W20577120822013 @default.
• W2057712082 countsByYear W20577120822014 @default.
• W2057712082 countsByYear W20577120822015 @default.
• W2057712082 countsByYear W20577120822016 @default.
• W2057712082 countsByYear W20577120822017 @default.
• W2057712082 countsByYear W20577120822018 @default.
• W2057712082 countsByYear W20577120822019 @default.
• W2057712082 countsByYear W20577120822020 @default.
• W2057712082 countsByYear W20577120822021 @default.
• W2057712082 countsByYear W20577120822022 @default.
• W2057712082 countsByYear W20577120822023 @default.
• W2057712082 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2057712082 hasAuthorship W2057712082A5012331452 @default.
• W2057712082 hasAuthorship W2057712082A5034397752 @default.
• W2057712082 hasAuthorship W2057712082A5052463350 @default.
• W2057712082 hasAuthorship W2057712082A5058257807 @default.
• W2057712082 hasConcept C118552586 @default.
• W2057712082 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2057712082 hasConcept C127573956 @default.
• W2057712082 hasConcept C14184104 @default.
• W2057712082 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2057712082 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W2057712082 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2057712082 hasConcept C2776432500 @default.
• W2057712082 hasConcept C2777953023 @default.
• W2057712082 hasConcept C33971717 @default.
• W2057712082 hasConcept C558461103 @default.
• W2057712082 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2057712082 hasConcept C84393581 @default.
• W2057712082 hasConceptScore W2057712082C118552586 @default.
• W2057712082 hasConceptScore W2057712082C126322002 @default.
• W2057712082 hasConceptScore W2057712082C127573956 @default.
• W2057712082 hasConceptScore W2057712082C14184104 @default.
• W2057712082 hasConceptScore W2057712082C15744967 @default.
• W2057712082 hasConceptScore W2057712082C169760540 @default.
• W2057712082 hasConceptScore W2057712082C1862650 @default.
• W2057712082 hasConceptScore W2057712082C2776432500 @default.
• W2057712082 hasConceptScore W2057712082C2777953023 @default.
• W2057712082 hasConceptScore W2057712082C33971717 @default.
• W2057712082 hasConceptScore W2057712082C558461103 @default.
• W2057712082 hasConceptScore W2057712082C71924100 @default.
• W2057712082 hasConceptScore W2057712082C84393581 @default.
• W2057712082 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2057712082 hasLocation W20577120821 @default.
• W2057712082 hasOpenAccess W2057712082 @default.
• W2057712082 hasPrimaryLocation W20577120821 @default.
• W2057712082 hasRelatedWork W1974079961 @default.
• W2057712082 hasRelatedWork W1987967340 @default.
• W2057712082 hasRelatedWork W202490408 @default.
• W2057712082 hasRelatedWork W2027890197 @default.
• W2057712082 hasRelatedWork W2055207357 @default.
• W2057712082 hasRelatedWork W2057712082 @default.
• W2057712082 hasRelatedWork W2146780921 @default.
• W2057712082 hasRelatedWork W2911862372 @default.
• W2057712082 hasRelatedWork W2993948777 @default.

• next