FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2057972575> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2057972575 endingPage "1000" @default.
• W2057972575 startingPage "996" @default.
• W2057972575 abstract "Purpose To evaluate the position of impacted maxillary canines in the alveolus using panoramic radiographs. Materials and Methods The present study was a retrospective chart review of 102 patients with 130 impacted maxillary canines from the University of Illinois at Chicago College of Dentistry and private practice. Of the 130 impacted maxillary canines, 59 were impacted buccally and 71 were impacted palatally. The inclination of the impacted maxillary canines to a horizontal line from the mesiobuccal cusps of the maxillary molars was measured. We used these measurements to predict the position of the tooth and correlate this prediction with the actual approach used during surgery. Results The mean angulation of the buccally impacted maxillary canines was 75.1° ± 18.2° (range, 8° to 111°). The mean angulation of the palatally impacted maxillary canines was 51.3° ± 15.3° (range, 12° to 91°). The mean difference between the angulation of the impacted maxillary canines as measured on the panoramic radiographs was statistically significant (P < .001). From a receiver-operator characteristic curve and using a logistic regression model, impactions greater than 65° were 26.6 times more likely to be buccally impacted maxillary canines (P < .001). Conclusions Panoramic radiographs are useful for predicting the location of impacted maxillary canines and the subsequent surgical approach required for exposure and orthodontic appliance attachment when computed tomography is unavailable or unnecessary otherwise. The use of panoramic radiographs for determing impacted maxillary canine position has a high sensitivity and specificity, with angulations greater than 65° associated with buccal impactions. To evaluate the position of impacted maxillary canines in the alveolus using panoramic radiographs. The present study was a retrospective chart review of 102 patients with 130 impacted maxillary canines from the University of Illinois at Chicago College of Dentistry and private practice. Of the 130 impacted maxillary canines, 59 were impacted buccally and 71 were impacted palatally. The inclination of the impacted maxillary canines to a horizontal line from the mesiobuccal cusps of the maxillary molars was measured. We used these measurements to predict the position of the tooth and correlate this prediction with the actual approach used during surgery. The mean angulation of the buccally impacted maxillary canines was 75.1° ± 18.2° (range, 8° to 111°). The mean angulation of the palatally impacted maxillary canines was 51.3° ± 15.3° (range, 12° to 91°). The mean difference between the angulation of the impacted maxillary canines as measured on the panoramic radiographs was statistically significant (P < .001). From a receiver-operator characteristic curve and using a logistic regression model, impactions greater than 65° were 26.6 times more likely to be buccally impacted maxillary canines (P < .001). Panoramic radiographs are useful for predicting the location of impacted maxillary canines and the subsequent surgical approach required for exposure and orthodontic appliance attachment when computed tomography is unavailable or unnecessary otherwise. The use of panoramic radiographs for determing impacted maxillary canine position has a high sensitivity and specificity, with angulations greater than 65° associated with buccal impactions." @default.
• W2057972575 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2057972575 creator A5031848089 @default.
• W2057972575 creator A5046434524 @default.
• W2057972575 creator A5049971146 @default.
• W2057972575 creator A5076764392 @default.
• W2057972575 creator A5083753836 @default.
• W2057972575 date "2010-05-01" @default.
• W2057972575 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2057972575 title "Use of Panoramic X-Ray to Determine Position of Impacted Maxillary Canines" @default.
• W2057972575 cites W1970307997 @default.
• W2057972575 cites W1975554613 @default.
• W2057972575 cites W2037407413 @default.
• W2057972575 cites W2058180152 @default.
• W2057972575 cites W2155718568 @default.
• W2057972575 cites W2466895274 @default.
• W2057972575 cites W2591619428 @default.
• W2057972575 cites W2997932400 @default.
• W2057972575 cites W3099852580 @default.
• W2057972575 cites W4237272394 @default.
• W2057972575 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2009.09.022" @default.
• W2057972575 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20138419" @default.
• W2057972575 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W2057972575 type Work @default.
• W2057972575 sameAs 2057972575 @default.
• W2057972575 citedByCount "39" @default.
• W2057972575 countsByYear W20579725752012 @default.
• W2057972575 countsByYear W20579725752013 @default.
• W2057972575 countsByYear W20579725752014 @default.
• W2057972575 countsByYear W20579725752015 @default.
• W2057972575 countsByYear W20579725752016 @default.
• W2057972575 countsByYear W20579725752017 @default.
• W2057972575 countsByYear W20579725752018 @default.
• W2057972575 countsByYear W20579725752019 @default.
• W2057972575 countsByYear W20579725752020 @default.
• W2057972575 countsByYear W20579725752021 @default.
• W2057972575 countsByYear W20579725752022 @default.
• W2057972575 countsByYear W20579725752023 @default.
• W2057972575 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2057972575 hasAuthorship W2057972575A5031848089 @default.
• W2057972575 hasAuthorship W2057972575A5046434524 @default.
• W2057972575 hasAuthorship W2057972575A5049971146 @default.
• W2057972575 hasAuthorship W2057972575A5076764392 @default.
• W2057972575 hasAuthorship W2057972575A5083753836 @default.
• W2057972575 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2057972575 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
• W2057972575 hasConcept C202271784 @default.
• W2057972575 hasConcept C2780950006 @default.
• W2057972575 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
• W2057972575 hasConcept C2993854130 @default.
• W2057972575 hasConcept C36454342 @default.
• W2057972575 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2057972575 hasConceptScore W2057972575C141071460 @default.
• W2057972575 hasConceptScore W2057972575C199343813 @default.
• W2057972575 hasConceptScore W2057972575C202271784 @default.
• W2057972575 hasConceptScore W2057972575C2780950006 @default.
• W2057972575 hasConceptScore W2057972575C29694066 @default.
• W2057972575 hasConceptScore W2057972575C2993854130 @default.
• W2057972575 hasConceptScore W2057972575C36454342 @default.
• W2057972575 hasConceptScore W2057972575C71924100 @default.
• W2057972575 hasIssue "5" @default.
• W2057972575 hasLocation W20579725751 @default.
• W2057972575 hasLocation W20579725752 @default.
• W2057972575 hasOpenAccess W2057972575 @default.
• W2057972575 hasPrimaryLocation W20579725751 @default.
• W2057972575 hasRelatedWork W1563249458 @default.
• W2057972575 hasRelatedWork W2038564597 @default.
• W2057972575 hasRelatedWork W2127414263 @default.
• W2057972575 hasRelatedWork W2134229706 @default.
• W2057972575 hasRelatedWork W2187011266 @default.
• W2057972575 hasRelatedWork W2417536887 @default.
• W2057972575 hasRelatedWork W3081348892 @default.
• W2057972575 hasRelatedWork W3200943621 @default.
• W2057972575 hasRelatedWork W4205567982 @default.
• W2057972575 hasRelatedWork W4297239224 @default.
• W2057972575 hasVolume "68" @default.
• W2057972575 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2057972575 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2057972575 magId "2057972575" @default.
• W2057972575 workType "article" @default.