FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2057994672> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2057994672 endingPage "312" @default.
• W2057994672 startingPage "304" @default.
• W2057994672 abstract "BACKGROUND & AIM Stents are often used for the palliation of inoperable esophageal or gastric cardia cancer. One of the drawbacks of the currently used stents is the high percentage of recurrent dysphagia due to stent migration and tissue growth. New stents have been designed to overcome this unwanted sequela of stent placement. In the present study, we investigated whether results of stent placement could be improved with newer stent designs. METHODS Between June 2004 and May 2006, 125 patients with dysphagia from inoperable carcinoma of the esophagus or gastric cardia were randomized to placement of an Ultraflex stent (N = 42), Polyflex stent (N = 41), or Niti-S stent (N = 42). Patients were followed by scheduled telephone calls at 14 days after treatment, and then monthly for 6 months or until death. Technical and functional outcome, complications, recurrent dysphagia, and survival were analyzed with, χ2 tests, Kaplan-Meier curves, and log-rank tests. RESULTS Stent placement was technically successful in all patients with an Ultraflex stent, in 34/41 (83%) patients with a Polyflex stent, and in 40/42 (95%) patients treated with a Niti-S stent (P= 0.008). Dysphagia score improved from a median of 3 (liquids only) to 1 (ability to eat some solid food) in all patients. There were no differences in complications among the three stent types. Recurrent dysphagia, caused by tissue in- or overgrowth, migration, or food obstruction, was significantly different between patients with an Ultraflex stent and patients with a Polyflex stent or Niti-S stent (22 [52%] vs 15 [37%] vs 13 [31%], P= 0.03). Stent migration occurred more frequently with Polyflex stents, whereas tissue in- or overgrowth was more frequently seen with Ultraflex stents, and to a lesser degree, Niti-S stents. No differences were found in survival (median survival: Ultraflex stent 132 days vs Polyflex stent 102 days vs Niti-S stent 159 days) among the three stent types. CONCLUSIONS All three stents are safe and offer adequate palliation of dysphagia from esophageal or gastric cardia cancer. Nonetheless, Polyflex stents seem the least preferable in this patient group, as placement of this device is technically demanding and associated with a high rate of stent migrations." @default.
• W2057994672 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2057994672 creator A5020927144 @default.
• W2057994672 creator A5035355889 @default.
• W2057994672 creator A5074268246 @default.
• W2057994672 creator A5081503066 @default.
• W2057994672 creator A5085253899 @default.
• W2057994672 date "2008-02-01" @default.
• W2057994672 modified "2023-10-15" @default.
• W2057994672 title "New Design Esophageal Stents for the Palliation of Dysphagia From Esophageal or Gastric Cardia Cancer: A Randomized Trial" @default.
• W2057994672 cites W2011869607 @default.
• W2057994672 cites W2018889358 @default.
• W2057994672 cites W2033732675 @default.
• W2057994672 cites W2037015896 @default.
• W2057994672 cites W2037206764 @default.
• W2057994672 cites W2047284234 @default.
• W2057994672 cites W2052766041 @default.
• W2057994672 cites W2068172633 @default.
• W2057994672 cites W2079667796 @default.
• W2057994672 cites W2090121024 @default.
• W2057994672 cites W2091041571 @default.
• W2057994672 cites W2094060433 @default.
• W2057994672 cites W2129055079 @default.
• W2057994672 cites W2166310899 @default.
• W2057994672 cites W4240406202 @default.
• W2057994672 cites W4250848184 @default.
• W2057994672 cites W4252356957 @default.
• W2057994672 cites W4376633455 @default.
• W2057994672 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01542.x" @default.
• W2057994672 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17900325" @default.
• W2057994672 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
• W2057994672 type Work @default.
• W2057994672 sameAs 2057994672 @default.
• W2057994672 citedByCount "172" @default.
• W2057994672 countsByYear W20579946722012 @default.
• W2057994672 countsByYear W20579946722013 @default.
• W2057994672 countsByYear W20579946722014 @default.
• W2057994672 countsByYear W20579946722015 @default.
• W2057994672 countsByYear W20579946722016 @default.
• W2057994672 countsByYear W20579946722017 @default.
• W2057994672 countsByYear W20579946722018 @default.
• W2057994672 countsByYear W20579946722019 @default.
• W2057994672 countsByYear W20579946722020 @default.
• W2057994672 countsByYear W20579946722021 @default.
• W2057994672 countsByYear W20579946722022 @default.
• W2057994672 countsByYear W20579946722023 @default.
• W2057994672 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2057994672 hasAuthorship W2057994672A5020927144 @default.
• W2057994672 hasAuthorship W2057994672A5035355889 @default.
• W2057994672 hasAuthorship W2057994672A5074268246 @default.
• W2057994672 hasAuthorship W2057994672A5081503066 @default.
• W2057994672 hasAuthorship W2057994672A5085253899 @default.
• W2057994672 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2057994672 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2057994672 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2057994672 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2057994672 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
• W2057994672 hasConcept C2776204476 @default.
• W2057994672 hasConcept C2777819096 @default.
• W2057994672 hasConcept C2778583881 @default.
• W2057994672 hasConcept C2779742542 @default.
• W2057994672 hasConcept C2780596822 @default.
• W2057994672 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2057994672 hasConceptScore W2057994672C121608353 @default.
• W2057994672 hasConceptScore W2057994672C126322002 @default.
• W2057994672 hasConceptScore W2057994672C126838900 @default.
• W2057994672 hasConceptScore W2057994672C141071460 @default.
• W2057994672 hasConceptScore W2057994672C168563851 @default.
• W2057994672 hasConceptScore W2057994672C2776204476 @default.
• W2057994672 hasConceptScore W2057994672C2777819096 @default.
• W2057994672 hasConceptScore W2057994672C2778583881 @default.
• W2057994672 hasConceptScore W2057994672C2779742542 @default.
• W2057994672 hasConceptScore W2057994672C2780596822 @default.
• W2057994672 hasConceptScore W2057994672C71924100 @default.
• W2057994672 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2057994672 hasLocation W20579946721 @default.
• W2057994672 hasLocation W20579946722 @default.
• W2057994672 hasOpenAccess W2057994672 @default.
• W2057994672 hasPrimaryLocation W20579946721 @default.
• W2057994672 hasRelatedWork W1592318234 @default.
• W2057994672 hasRelatedWork W1969840005 @default.
• W2057994672 hasRelatedWork W1969920992 @default.
• W2057994672 hasRelatedWork W2010417443 @default.
• W2057994672 hasRelatedWork W2078253293 @default.
• W2057994672 hasRelatedWork W2360361295 @default.
• W2057994672 hasRelatedWork W2396627519 @default.
• W2057994672 hasRelatedWork W3016455942 @default.
• W2057994672 hasRelatedWork W3137199429 @default.
• W2057994672 hasRelatedWork W4283829554 @default.
• W2057994672 hasVolume "103" @default.
• W2057994672 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2057994672 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2057994672 magId "2057994672" @default.
• W2057994672 workType "article" @default.