FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2058066900> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2058066900 abstract "PreviousNext No AccessSEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2004Azimuthal analysis of reflectivity for fracture characterization: Rock physics modeling and field exampleAuthors: Diana C. SavaGary MavkoDiana C. SavaGeophysics Dept., Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305Search for more papers by this author and Gary MavkoGeophysics Dept., Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305Search for more papers by this authorhttps://doi.org/10.1190/1.1845140 SectionsAboutPDF/ePub ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail Abstract Aligned vertical fractures can produce anisotropy in the shallow crust that can be observed in seismic data, such as amplitude variation with angle of incidence and azimuth (AVAZ). AVAZ can be a useful technique for determining the main fracture orientation, fracture density and sometimes the type of fluid in the fractures. The azimuthal variations in the P‐wave reflections have been observed in field data by different authors, such as Lynn et al. (1996), Grimm and Lynn (1997), Mallick et al. (1998), Teng (1998), Perez et al. (1999), Shen et al. (2002). One important advantage of this method is that it can provide localized information at the interface of interest, unlike the travel time methods, which give global estimates. Also, if the reservoir is very thin, travel time techniques are not very useful for fracture characterization This paper presents the analysis of the PP reflectivity (Rpp) from a 3D seismic data set acquired over a gas reservoir, represented by a fractured carbonate in Eastern Texas. The final goal is to determine the main orientations of the fractures and their spatial densities. We also present the results of our site‐specific rock physics fracture modeling, based on the well‐log data. The AVAZ modeling shows that the polarity of the azimuthal variation of the reflectivity changes with the fluid and fracture compressibility. Therefore, rock physics modeling is a key link between the observed seismic amplitude variation with azimuth and the actual fracture parameters, such as fracture strike and density. Based on the results of the rock physics modeling, we derive the mean fracture orientations from the seismic data using a bootstrap method. By using this technique we can quantify the uncertainty in fracture orientation due to the possible measurement errors. We find an excellent agreement between the fracture orientation derived from the azimuthal variation of the seismic amplitudes at far offsets and the fracture orientation derived from the FMI logs from the nearby wells. There is also a very good agreement between the mean fracture strikes from the azimuthal variation in the seismic amplitudes and the present regional stress field. The mean fracture orientation is parallel to the maximum horizontal stress in the region.Permalink: https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1845140FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited ByCharacterization of naturally fractured Arbuckle Group in the Wellington Field, Kansas, using S-wave amplitude variation with offsetMenal Gupta, Kyle Spikes, and Bob Hardage9 November 2016 | Interpretation, Vol. 5, No. 1Quantitative integration of geological and seismic data using statistical rock physics: example for fracture characterizationDiana C. Sava and Gary Mavko7 December 2005 SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2004ISSN (print):1052-3812 ISSN (online):1949-4645Copyright: 2004 Pages: 2586 publication data© 2004 Copyright © 2004 Society of Exploration GeophysicistsPublisher:Society of Exploration Geophysicists HistoryPublished: 03 Jan 2005 CITATION INFORMATION Diana C. Sava and Gary Mavko, (2004), Azimuthal analysis of reflectivity for fracture characterization: Rock physics modeling and field example, SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts : 1583-1586. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1845140 Plain-Language Summary PDF DownloadLoading ..." @default.
• W2058066900 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2058066900 creator A5012365110 @default.
• W2058066900 creator A5082938065 @default.
• W2058066900 date "2004-01-01" @default.
• W2058066900 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2058066900 title "Azimuthal analysis of reflectivity for fracture characterization: Rock physics modeling and field example" @default.
• W2058066900 cites W2004109356 @default.
• W2058066900 cites W2005269226 @default.
• W2058066900 cites W2065347506 @default.
• W2058066900 cites W2087474120 @default.
• W2058066900 cites W2107318287 @default.
• W2058066900 cites W2107891009 @default.
• W2058066900 cites W2115714511 @default.
• W2058066900 cites W2147699377 @default.
• W2058066900 cites W2163035644 @default.
• W2058066900 doi "https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1845140" @default.
• W2058066900 hasPublicationYear "2004" @default.
• W2058066900 type Work @default.
• W2058066900 sameAs 2058066900 @default.
• W2058066900 citedByCount "2" @default.
• W2058066900 countsByYear W20580669002017 @default.
• W2058066900 crossrefType "proceedings-article" @default.
• W2058066900 hasAuthorship W2058066900A5012365110 @default.
• W2058066900 hasAuthorship W2058066900A5082938065 @default.
• W2058066900 hasConcept C108597893 @default.
• W2058066900 hasConcept C120665830 @default.
• W2058066900 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2058066900 hasConcept C127313418 @default.
• W2058066900 hasConcept C14641988 @default.
• W2058066900 hasConcept C159737794 @default.
• W2058066900 hasConcept C165205528 @default.
• W2058066900 hasConcept C187320778 @default.
• W2058066900 hasConcept C199289684 @default.
• W2058066900 hasConcept C202444582 @default.
• W2058066900 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
• W2058066900 hasConcept C2776698055 @default.
• W2058066900 hasConcept C2780841128 @default.
• W2058066900 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2058066900 hasConcept C43369102 @default.
• W2058066900 hasConcept C5900021 @default.
• W2058066900 hasConcept C8058405 @default.
• W2058066900 hasConcept C85725439 @default.
• W2058066900 hasConcept C9652623 @default.
• W2058066900 hasConceptScore W2058066900C108597893 @default.
• W2058066900 hasConceptScore W2058066900C120665830 @default.
• W2058066900 hasConceptScore W2058066900C121332964 @default.
• W2058066900 hasConceptScore W2058066900C127313418 @default.
• W2058066900 hasConceptScore W2058066900C14641988 @default.
• W2058066900 hasConceptScore W2058066900C159737794 @default.
• W2058066900 hasConceptScore W2058066900C165205528 @default.
• W2058066900 hasConceptScore W2058066900C187320778 @default.
• W2058066900 hasConceptScore W2058066900C199289684 @default.
• W2058066900 hasConceptScore W2058066900C202444582 @default.
• W2058066900 hasConceptScore W2058066900C2524010 @default.
• W2058066900 hasConceptScore W2058066900C2776698055 @default.
• W2058066900 hasConceptScore W2058066900C2780841128 @default.
• W2058066900 hasConceptScore W2058066900C33923547 @default.
• W2058066900 hasConceptScore W2058066900C43369102 @default.
• W2058066900 hasConceptScore W2058066900C5900021 @default.
• W2058066900 hasConceptScore W2058066900C8058405 @default.
• W2058066900 hasConceptScore W2058066900C85725439 @default.
• W2058066900 hasConceptScore W2058066900C9652623 @default.
• W2058066900 hasLocation W20580669001 @default.
• W2058066900 hasOpenAccess W2058066900 @default.
• W2058066900 hasPrimaryLocation W20580669001 @default.
• W2058066900 hasRelatedWork W1985106991 @default.
• W2058066900 hasRelatedWork W2010446848 @default.
• W2058066900 hasRelatedWork W2046770021 @default.
• W2058066900 hasRelatedWork W2150345570 @default.
• W2058066900 hasRelatedWork W2182623152 @default.
• W2058066900 hasRelatedWork W2350124190 @default.
• W2058066900 hasRelatedWork W2393070470 @default.
• W2058066900 hasRelatedWork W3121083000 @default.
• W2058066900 hasRelatedWork W3150138053 @default.
• W2058066900 hasRelatedWork W4226142241 @default.
• W2058066900 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2058066900 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2058066900 magId "2058066900" @default.
• W2058066900 workType "article" @default.