FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2058077436> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2058077436 endingPage "668" @default.
• W2058077436 startingPage "663" @default.
• W2058077436 abstract "This is one of a series of statements discussing the use of GI endoscopy in common clinical situations. The Standards of Practice Committee of the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) prepared this text. In preparing this guideline, a search of the medical literature was performed by using PubMed. Additional references were obtained from the bibliographies of the identified articles and from recommendations of expert consultants. When few or no data exist from well-designed prospective trials, emphasis is placed on results from large series and reports from recognized experts. Guidelines for appropriate use of endoscopy are based on a critical review of the available data and expert consensus at the time the guidelines are drafted. Further controlled clinical studies may be needed to clarify aspects of this guideline. This guideline may be revised as necessary to account for changes in technology, new data, or other aspects of clinical practice. The recommendations are based on reviewed studies and are graded on the quality of the supporting evidence (Table 1). 1 Guyatt G.H. Oxman A.D. Vist G.E. et al. GRADE Working GroupGRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008; 336: 924-926 Crossref PubMed Google Scholar The strength of individual recommendations is based on both the aggregate evidence quality and an assessment of the anticipated benefits and harms. Weaker recommendations are indicated by phrases such as “we suggest,” whereas stronger recommendations are typically stated as “we recommend.” Table 1GRADE system for rating the quality of evidence for guidelines Quality of evidence Definition Symbol High quality Further research is very unlikely to change our confidence in the estimate of effect ⊕⊕⊕⊕ Moderate quality Further research is likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and may change the estimate ⊕⊕⊕○ Low quality Further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of effect and is likely to change the estimate ⊕⊕○○ Very low quality Any estimate of effect is very uncertain ⊕○○○ Adapted from Guyatt et al. 1 Guyatt G.H. Oxman A.D. Vist G.E. et al. GRADE Working GroupGRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008; 336: 924-926 Crossref PubMed Google Scholar Open table in a new tab Adapted from Guyatt et al. 1 Guyatt G.H. Oxman A.D. Vist G.E. et al. GRADE Working GroupGRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008; 336: 924-926 Crossref PubMed Google Scholar" @default.
• W2058077436 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2058077436 creator A5001592119 @default.
• W2058077436 creator A5002219265 @default.
• W2058077436 creator A5002726230 @default.
• W2058077436 creator A5004105156 @default.
• W2058077436 creator A5025127245 @default.
• W2058077436 creator A5034434585 @default.
• W2058077436 creator A5035301378 @default.
• W2058077436 creator A5039129451 @default.
• W2058077436 creator A5047126443 @default.
• W2058077436 creator A5051279094 @default.
• W2058077436 creator A5060418874 @default.
• W2058077436 creator A5064008787 @default.
• W2058077436 creator A5068822894 @default.
• W2058077436 creator A5077630806 @default.
• W2058077436 creator A5091254467 @default.
• W2058077436 date "2010-04-01" @default.
• W2058077436 modified "2023-10-01" @default.
• W2058077436 title "The role of endoscopy in the management of patients with peptic ulcer disease" @default.
• W2058077436 cites W1554840845 @default.
• W2058077436 cites W1968946289 @default.
• W2058077436 cites W1971118578 @default.
• W2058077436 cites W1977073012 @default.
• W2058077436 cites W1978375278 @default.
• W2058077436 cites W1978847895 @default.
• W2058077436 cites W1980058901 @default.
• W2058077436 cites W1982894024 @default.
• W2058077436 cites W1983288946 @default.
• W2058077436 cites W1990809397 @default.
• W2058077436 cites W1991978490 @default.
• W2058077436 cites W1993719880 @default.
• W2058077436 cites W2004777239 @default.
• W2058077436 cites W2011735771 @default.
• W2058077436 cites W2016146901 @default.
• W2058077436 cites W2020039588 @default.
• W2058077436 cites W2021184032 @default.
• W2058077436 cites W2024321325 @default.
• W2058077436 cites W2024903615 @default.
• W2058077436 cites W2042485506 @default.
• W2058077436 cites W2047670763 @default.
• W2058077436 cites W2052165857 @default.
• W2058077436 cites W2055892247 @default.
• W2058077436 cites W2068226294 @default.
• W2058077436 cites W2071957690 @default.
• W2058077436 cites W2075175323 @default.
• W2058077436 cites W2078096735 @default.
• W2058077436 cites W2078174777 @default.
• W2058077436 cites W2086028625 @default.
• W2058077436 cites W2091459554 @default.
• W2058077436 cites W2093712590 @default.
• W2058077436 cites W2096709571 @default.
• W2058077436 cites W2099196814 @default.
• W2058077436 cites W2109026014 @default.
• W2058077436 cites W2111108353 @default.
• W2058077436 cites W2111489129 @default.
• W2058077436 cites W2142880561 @default.
• W2058077436 cites W2143107875 @default.
• W2058077436 cites W2146197585 @default.
• W2058077436 cites W2149372152 @default.
• W2058077436 cites W2156617654 @default.
• W2058077436 cites W2162266890 @default.
• W2058077436 cites W2162575719 @default.
• W2058077436 cites W2165010366 @default.
• W2058077436 cites W2173184397 @default.
• W2058077436 cites W2315941418 @default.
• W2058077436 cites W2330441369 @default.
• W2058077436 cites W2395279638 @default.
• W2058077436 cites W2414551598 @default.
• W2058077436 cites W2602102457 @default.
• W2058077436 cites W303974392 @default.
• W2058077436 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2009.11.026" @default.
• W2058077436 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20363407" @default.
• W2058077436 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W2058077436 type Work @default.
• W2058077436 sameAs 2058077436 @default.
• W2058077436 citedByCount "102" @default.
• W2058077436 countsByYear W20580774362012 @default.
• W2058077436 countsByYear W20580774362013 @default.
• W2058077436 countsByYear W20580774362014 @default.
• W2058077436 countsByYear W20580774362015 @default.
• W2058077436 countsByYear W20580774362016 @default.
• W2058077436 countsByYear W20580774362017 @default.
• W2058077436 countsByYear W20580774362018 @default.
• W2058077436 countsByYear W20580774362019 @default.
• W2058077436 countsByYear W20580774362020 @default.
• W2058077436 countsByYear W20580774362021 @default.
• W2058077436 countsByYear W20580774362022 @default.
• W2058077436 countsByYear W20580774362023 @default.
• W2058077436 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2058077436 hasAuthorship W2058077436A5001592119 @default.
• W2058077436 hasAuthorship W2058077436A5002219265 @default.
• W2058077436 hasAuthorship W2058077436A5002726230 @default.
• W2058077436 hasAuthorship W2058077436A5004105156 @default.
• W2058077436 hasAuthorship W2058077436A5025127245 @default.
• W2058077436 hasAuthorship W2058077436A5034434585 @default.
• W2058077436 hasAuthorship W2058077436A5035301378 @default.
• W2058077436 hasAuthorship W2058077436A5039129451 @default.

• next