FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2058473965> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2058473965 abstract "Abstract Success is not just elusive; it is also multifaceted and difficult to measure. A firm can assess the success or failure of a development project in any (or all) of many terms, including customer satisfaction, financial return and technical advantage. To complicate matters, success may be measured not only at the level of the individual project, but also at the program level. With so many variables to consider and so many stakeholders involved, managers face a difficult challenge just deciding which measures are useful for measuring product development success. Recognizing that no single measure suffices for gauging the success of every product development project, Abbie Griffin and Albert L. Page hypothesize that the most appropriate set of measures for assessing project-level success depends on the project strategy. For example, the objectives (and thus, the success criteria) for a new product that creates an entirely new market will differ from those of a project that extends an existing product line. Similarly, they hypothesize that the appropriate measures of a product development program's overall success depend on the firm's innovation strategy. For example, a firm that values being first to market will measure success in different terms from those used by a firm that focuses on maintaining a secure market niche. To test these hypotheses, product development professionals were presented with six project strategy scenarios and four business strategy scenarios. For each project strategy scenario, participants were asked to select the four most useful measures of project success. For each business strategy scenario, participants were asked to choose the set of four measures that would provide the most useful overall assessment of product development success. The responses strongly support the idea that the most appropriate measures of project-level and program-level success depend on the firm's project strategy and business strategy, respectively. For example, customer satisfaction and customer acceptance were among the most useful customer-based measures of success for several project strategies, but market share was cited as the most useful customer-based measure for projects involving new-to-the-company products or line extensions. At the program level, firms with a business strategy that places little emphasis on innovation need to focus on measuring the efficiency of their product development program, while innovative firms need to assess the program's contribution to company growth." @default.
• W2058473965 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2058473965 creator A5066046178 @default.
• W2058473965 creator A5084932488 @default.
• W2058473965 date "1996-11-01" @default.
• W2058473965 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2058473965 title "PDMA success measurement project: Recommended measures for product development success and failure" @default.
• W2058473965 cites W1532394913 @default.
• W2058473965 cites W1578867421 @default.
• W2058473965 cites W1589433582 @default.
• W2058473965 cites W1597343373 @default.
• W2058473965 cites W1966783909 @default.
• W2058473965 cites W1977365357 @default.
• W2058473965 cites W1983515580 @default.
• W2058473965 cites W1985589954 @default.
• W2058473965 cites W2006709915 @default.
• W2058473965 cites W2009263458 @default.
• W2058473965 cites W2025586901 @default.
• W2058473965 cites W2029042131 @default.
• W2058473965 cites W2037894668 @default.
• W2058473965 cites W2038999423 @default.
• W2058473965 cites W2042899233 @default.
• W2058473965 cites W2046191875 @default.
• W2058473965 cites W2054491711 @default.
• W2058473965 cites W2054509426 @default.
• W2058473965 cites W2078888970 @default.
• W2058473965 cites W2083330734 @default.
• W2058473965 cites W2092268060 @default.
• W2058473965 cites W2113198229 @default.
• W2058473965 cites W2116068584 @default.
• W2058473965 cites W2168113595 @default.
• W2058473965 cites W2279279459 @default.
• W2058473965 cites W578223916 @default.
• W2058473965 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/s0737-6782(96)00052-5" @default.
• W2058473965 hasPublicationYear "1996" @default.
• W2058473965 type Work @default.
• W2058473965 sameAs 2058473965 @default.
• W2058473965 citedByCount "579" @default.
• W2058473965 countsByYear W20584739652012 @default.
• W2058473965 countsByYear W20584739652013 @default.
• W2058473965 countsByYear W20584739652014 @default.
• W2058473965 countsByYear W20584739652015 @default.
• W2058473965 countsByYear W20584739652016 @default.
• W2058473965 countsByYear W20584739652017 @default.
• W2058473965 countsByYear W20584739652018 @default.
• W2058473965 countsByYear W20584739652019 @default.
• W2058473965 countsByYear W20584739652020 @default.
• W2058473965 countsByYear W20584739652023 @default.
• W2058473965 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2058473965 hasAuthorship W2058473965A5066046178 @default.
• W2058473965 hasAuthorship W2058473965A5084932488 @default.
• W2058473965 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2058473965 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2058473965 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W2058473965 hasConcept C177264268 @default.
• W2058473965 hasConcept C19351080 @default.
• W2058473965 hasConcept C195094911 @default.
• W2058473965 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W2058473965 hasConcept C21547014 @default.
• W2058473965 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
• W2058473965 hasConcept C2780009758 @default.
• W2058473965 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2058473965 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2058473965 hasConcept C77088390 @default.
• W2058473965 hasConcept C90673727 @default.
• W2058473965 hasConceptScore W2058473965C144133560 @default.
• W2058473965 hasConceptScore W2058473965C162324750 @default.
• W2058473965 hasConceptScore W2058473965C162853370 @default.
• W2058473965 hasConceptScore W2058473965C177264268 @default.
• W2058473965 hasConceptScore W2058473965C19351080 @default.
• W2058473965 hasConceptScore W2058473965C195094911 @default.
• W2058473965 hasConceptScore W2058473965C199360897 @default.
• W2058473965 hasConceptScore W2058473965C21547014 @default.
• W2058473965 hasConceptScore W2058473965C2524010 @default.
• W2058473965 hasConceptScore W2058473965C2780009758 @default.
• W2058473965 hasConceptScore W2058473965C33923547 @default.
• W2058473965 hasConceptScore W2058473965C41008148 @default.
• W2058473965 hasConceptScore W2058473965C77088390 @default.
• W2058473965 hasConceptScore W2058473965C90673727 @default.
• W2058473965 hasLocation W20584739651 @default.
• W2058473965 hasOpenAccess W2058473965 @default.
• W2058473965 hasPrimaryLocation W20584739651 @default.
• W2058473965 hasRelatedWork W1527311855 @default.
• W2058473965 hasRelatedWork W1966783909 @default.
• W2058473965 hasRelatedWork W1987258130 @default.
• W2058473965 hasRelatedWork W2045148212 @default.
• W2058473965 hasRelatedWork W2061977616 @default.
• W2058473965 hasRelatedWork W2068370738 @default.
• W2058473965 hasRelatedWork W2094902704 @default.
• W2058473965 hasRelatedWork W2094914926 @default.
• W2058473965 hasRelatedWork W2103013833 @default.
• W2058473965 hasRelatedWork W2106096361 @default.
• W2058473965 hasRelatedWork W2108795964 @default.
• W2058473965 hasRelatedWork W2109783817 @default.
• W2058473965 hasRelatedWork W2113198229 @default.
• W2058473965 hasRelatedWork W2121220078 @default.
• W2058473965 hasRelatedWork W2123709218 @default.
• W2058473965 hasRelatedWork W2124057980 @default.
• W2058473965 hasRelatedWork W2131873985 @default.
• W2058473965 hasRelatedWork W2138759851 @default.

• next