FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2058741112> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2058741112 endingPage "300" @default.
• W2058741112 startingPage "284" @default.
• W2058741112 abstract "The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review of the literature to evaluate the accuracy of FDG-PET in staging and restaging of cutaneous melanoma. Systematic methods were used to identify, select, and evaluate the methodologic quality of the studies as well as to summarize the overall findings of sensitivity and specificity. The search strategy consisted of identifying studies published between 2000 and 2006. Inclusion criteria were studies that evaluated the diagnostic performance of FDG-PET in staging/restaging of cutaneous melanoma. The results were compared and pooled with a meta-analysis published previously that included studies published until 1999. The meta-analysis included 95% confidence intervals (CI) of sensitivity, specificity, likelihood-ratio (LR), and diagnostic-odds-ratio (DOR). The quantitative meta-analysis included 24 studies that were analysed in two groups: eight studies were included only in the regional staging analysis (group I), 13 studies were included only in the detection of distant metastases analysis (group II), and three studies were included in both analyses. Compliance with the methodologic-quality criteria was acceptable. We analysed the results of data presented in patients, lesions, basins, lymph-nodes, areas, and scans. Regarding the performance of FDG-PET in the detection of metastases, the pooled studies presented homogeneity for the negative-LR (0.15; 95% CI, 0.10–0.22) when analyzing lesions. When analyzing scans, there was global homogeneity for specificity (0.86; 95% CI, 0.77–0.92), positive-LR (5.86; 95% CI, 3.64–9.43), and DOR (37.89; 95% CI, 15.80–90.86). The pooled studies presented heterogeneity for the other items analysed. Regarding the detection of regional metastases, when analyzing lymph-nodes there was global homogeneity for specificity (0.99; 95% CI, 0.97–0.99; P = 0.101). The meta-regression evidenced that the variable that most influenced the DOR of the different studies and that can explain the heterogeneity was the year of publication; this may be related to the evolution of PET technology and an improvement of sensitivity/specificity. FDG-PET is not useful in the evaluation of regional metastases, as it does not detect microscopic disease. However, FDG-PET could be useful in the detection of distant metastases, and could suggest its utility in the management of patients with cutaneous melanoma." @default.
• W2058741112 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2058741112 creator A5019955301 @default.
• W2058741112 creator A5067039715 @default.
• W2058741112 creator A5075011367 @default.
• W2058741112 creator A5079611861 @default.
• W2058741112 creator A5084292168 @default.
• W2058741112 creator A5086031836 @default.
• W2058741112 creator A5089298201 @default.
• W2058741112 date "2009-09-02" @default.
• W2058741112 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2058741112 title "Meta-analysis of the performance of 18F-FDG PET in cutaneous melanoma" @default.
• W2058741112 cites W140225424 @default.
• W2058741112 cites W1667002384 @default.
• W2058741112 cites W1868973394 @default.
• W2058741112 cites W1967762248 @default.
• W2058741112 cites W1974483691 @default.
• W2058741112 cites W1980199015 @default.
• W2058741112 cites W1993862203 @default.
• W2058741112 cites W2005291918 @default.
• W2058741112 cites W2009843024 @default.
• W2058741112 cites W2015606398 @default.
• W2058741112 cites W2017542214 @default.
• W2058741112 cites W2026220086 @default.
• W2058741112 cites W2026592280 @default.
• W2058741112 cites W2034999592 @default.
• W2058741112 cites W2042295867 @default.
• W2058741112 cites W2044366899 @default.
• W2058741112 cites W2050066532 @default.
• W2058741112 cites W2067004832 @default.
• W2058741112 cites W2071765362 @default.
• W2058741112 cites W2074884761 @default.
• W2058741112 cites W2080051713 @default.
• W2058741112 cites W2080545122 @default.
• W2058741112 cites W2083923088 @default.
• W2058741112 cites W2085081696 @default.
• W2058741112 cites W2088331641 @default.
• W2058741112 cites W2091521874 @default.
• W2058741112 cites W2094129713 @default.
• W2058741112 cites W2101288574 @default.
• W2058741112 cites W2101465080 @default.
• W2058741112 cites W2103114237 @default.
• W2058741112 cites W2104485610 @default.
• W2058741112 cites W2106593794 @default.
• W2058741112 cites W2113009004 @default.
• W2058741112 cites W2131365547 @default.
• W2058741112 cites W2169160087 @default.
• W2058741112 cites W2298790834 @default.
• W2058741112 cites W3180270935 @default.
• W2058741112 cites W4229724951 @default.
• W2058741112 cites W4246621662 @default.
• W2058741112 doi "https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-009-1224-8" @default.
• W2058741112 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/2886141" @default.
• W2058741112 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19727717" @default.
• W2058741112 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
• W2058741112 type Work @default.
• W2058741112 sameAs 2058741112 @default.
• W2058741112 citedByCount "77" @default.
• W2058741112 countsByYear W20587411122012 @default.
• W2058741112 countsByYear W20587411122013 @default.
• W2058741112 countsByYear W20587411122014 @default.
• W2058741112 countsByYear W20587411122015 @default.
• W2058741112 countsByYear W20587411122016 @default.
• W2058741112 countsByYear W20587411122017 @default.
• W2058741112 countsByYear W20587411122018 @default.
• W2058741112 countsByYear W20587411122019 @default.
• W2058741112 countsByYear W20587411122020 @default.
• W2058741112 countsByYear W20587411122021 @default.
• W2058741112 countsByYear W20587411122022 @default.
• W2058741112 countsByYear W20587411122023 @default.
• W2058741112 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2058741112 hasAuthorship W2058741112A5019955301 @default.
• W2058741112 hasAuthorship W2058741112A5067039715 @default.
• W2058741112 hasAuthorship W2058741112A5075011367 @default.
• W2058741112 hasAuthorship W2058741112A5079611861 @default.
• W2058741112 hasAuthorship W2058741112A5084292168 @default.
• W2058741112 hasAuthorship W2058741112A5086031836 @default.
• W2058741112 hasAuthorship W2058741112A5089298201 @default.
• W2058741112 hasBestOaLocation W20587411122 @default.
• W2058741112 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2058741112 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2058741112 hasConcept C143998085 @default.
• W2058741112 hasConcept C156957248 @default.
• W2058741112 hasConcept C157481446 @default.
• W2058741112 hasConcept C2775842073 @default.
• W2058741112 hasConcept C2777658100 @default.
• W2058741112 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W2058741112 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W2058741112 hasConcept C502942594 @default.
• W2058741112 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2058741112 hasConcept C95190672 @default.
• W2058741112 hasConceptScore W2058741112C126322002 @default.
• W2058741112 hasConceptScore W2058741112C126838900 @default.
• W2058741112 hasConceptScore W2058741112C143998085 @default.
• W2058741112 hasConceptScore W2058741112C156957248 @default.
• W2058741112 hasConceptScore W2058741112C157481446 @default.
• W2058741112 hasConceptScore W2058741112C2775842073 @default.
• W2058741112 hasConceptScore W2058741112C2777658100 @default.

• next