FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2059003356> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2059003356 abstract "THE DISMANTLING OF THE FIRST UMBRELLA MOVEMENT for political parties in post-Soviet Russia, Democratic Russia, is in many ways just as spectacular as its initial coming into being. Having effectively pressed for independence in 1990 through its group of deputies in the RSFSR Congress and mobilised some 150,000 activists in the spring of 1991 in support of Boris El'tsin's presidential candidacy, the mass movement was reduced by 1992 to a 'tin can, rattling down the stairs of history, leaving a sound of emptiness behind it'.' By late 1991 and early 1992 Democratic Russia leaders were accusing each other of having 'Bolshevik' leanings and endangering Russia's democratic project by engaging in organisational intrigues and power plays. When liberals in government came looking for political support in 1992 they found a movement in demise. As Gaidar observed, 'by the end of 1992 the democratic movement in Russia was a rather pitiful structure ... The most powerful organisation in our part of the political spectrum, Democratic Russia, was falling apart'.2 Although never a coherent organisation, the factionalism and internal conflicts inside Democratic Russia and its constituent parties have been viewed as 'more pervasive and more crippling in its effect than in most other cases'.3 Especially during the latter part of 1991, Democratic Russia experienced tormenting splits and internal contention over frames for collective action, organisational schemes and friends and foes among elites to such an extent that organisational coherence was undermined. The immediate effect of these divisions was that the political opportunities provided by the gradual relaxation of state-society relations under Gorbachev did not produce a viable pro-democratic opposition structure. To be sure, Democratic Russia was never intended as anything other than an alliance of alliances. Still, several attempts were made to consolidate the movement as an organisation, and even a political party with clear rules for membership and a distinct party programme. This process failed utterly, and the once powerful movement was reduced to a support movement for economic reforms and an executive tool for popular mobilisation. This article seeks to employ the literature on resource mobilisation to explain the failure. Theorists argue that this approach deals 'in general terms with the dynamics and tactics of social movement growth, decline and change'.4 Central resources are access to media, authorities (influential allies) and other parties, and the interaction between movement organisations. Two arguments will be central. First, it will be argued that all movement organisations will seek to consolidate once the initial aim" @default.
• W2059003356 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2059003356 creator A5062943686 @default.
• W2059003356 date "2004-12-01" @default.
• W2059003356 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
• W2059003356 title "From external success to internal collapse: the case of democratic Russia" @default.
• W2059003356 cites W2009146964 @default.
• W2059003356 cites W2057792812 @default.
• W2059003356 doi "https://doi.org/10.1080/1465342042000308929" @default.
• W2059003356 hasPublicationYear "2004" @default.
• W2059003356 type Work @default.
• W2059003356 sameAs 2059003356 @default.
• W2059003356 citedByCount "4" @default.
• W2059003356 countsByYear W20590033562013 @default.
• W2059003356 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2059003356 hasAuthorship W2059003356A5062943686 @default.
• W2059003356 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2059003356 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2059003356 hasConcept C138921699 @default.
• W2059003356 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2059003356 hasConcept C163258240 @default.
• W2059003356 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2059003356 hasConcept C197487636 @default.
• W2059003356 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2059003356 hasConcept C2777720223 @default.
• W2059003356 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2059003356 hasConcept C35651441 @default.
• W2059003356 hasConcept C555826173 @default.
• W2059003356 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W2059003356 hasConcept C94625758 @default.
• W2059003356 hasConceptScore W2059003356C105795698 @default.
• W2059003356 hasConceptScore W2059003356C121332964 @default.
• W2059003356 hasConceptScore W2059003356C138921699 @default.
• W2059003356 hasConceptScore W2059003356C144024400 @default.
• W2059003356 hasConceptScore W2059003356C163258240 @default.
• W2059003356 hasConceptScore W2059003356C17744445 @default.
• W2059003356 hasConceptScore W2059003356C197487636 @default.
• W2059003356 hasConceptScore W2059003356C199539241 @default.
• W2059003356 hasConceptScore W2059003356C2777720223 @default.
• W2059003356 hasConceptScore W2059003356C33923547 @default.
• W2059003356 hasConceptScore W2059003356C35651441 @default.
• W2059003356 hasConceptScore W2059003356C555826173 @default.
• W2059003356 hasConceptScore W2059003356C62520636 @default.
• W2059003356 hasConceptScore W2059003356C94625758 @default.
• W2059003356 hasLocation W20590033561 @default.
• W2059003356 hasOpenAccess W2059003356 @default.
• W2059003356 hasPrimaryLocation W20590033561 @default.
• W2059003356 hasRelatedWork W1846160840 @default.
• W2059003356 hasRelatedWork W2054617305 @default.
• W2059003356 hasRelatedWork W2322606523 @default.
• W2059003356 hasRelatedWork W2323942352 @default.
• W2059003356 hasRelatedWork W2326845224 @default.
• W2059003356 hasRelatedWork W2354942886 @default.
• W2059003356 hasRelatedWork W2378134857 @default.
• W2059003356 hasRelatedWork W2951217368 @default.
• W2059003356 hasRelatedWork W3014336423 @default.
• W2059003356 hasRelatedWork W4252673445 @default.
• W2059003356 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2059003356 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2059003356 magId "2059003356" @default.
• W2059003356 workType "article" @default.