FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2059019404> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2059019404 endingPage "12" @default.
• W2059019404 startingPage "8" @default.
• W2059019404 abstract "No AccessPerspectives on School-Based IssuesArticle1 Jul 2002Adverse Effects of Auditory Processing Disorders on School Performance Teri James Bellis Teri James Bellis Department of Communication Disorders University of South Dakotavermillion, SD Google Scholar More articles by this author https://doi.org/10.1044/sbi3.2.8 SectionsAboutFull TextPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationTrack Citations ShareFacebookTwitterLinked In References ASHA Task Force on Central Auditory Processing Consensus Development. (1996). Central auditory processing: Current status of research and implications for clinical practice.American Journal of Audiology, 5, 41–54. Google Scholar Anderson, K., & Matkin, N. H. (1996). Screening Instrument for Targeting Educational Risk (SIFTER). Tampa, FL: Educational Audiology Association. Google Scholar Anderson, K., & Smaldino, J. (1998) Listening Inventory for Education (LIFE). Tampa, FL: Educational Audiology Association. Google Scholar Bellis, T. J. (2002). When the brain can’t hear: Unraveling the mystery of auditory processing disorder. New York: Pocket Books. Google Scholar Bellis, T. J. (in press a). Assessment and management of central auditory processing disorders in the educational setting: From science to practice (2nd ed.). Clifton Park, NY: Singular/Delmar Learning. Google Scholar Bellis, T. J. (in press b). Developing deficit-specific intervention plans for individuals with auditory processing disorders.Seminars in Hearing. Google Scholar Bellis, T. J., & Ferre, J. M. (1999). Multidimensional approach to the differential diagnosis of central auditory processing disorders in children.Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 10, 319–328. MedlineGoogle Scholar Cacace, A. T., & McFarland, D. J. (1998). Central auditory processing disorder in school-aged children: A critical review.Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41, 355–373. ASHAWireGoogle Scholar Campbell, T., & McNeil, M. (1985). Effects of presentation rate and divided attention on auditory comprehension in children with acquired language disorder.Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 28, 518–520. Google Scholar Chermak, G. D., Hall, J. W., & Musiek, F. E. (1999). Differential diagnosis and management of central auditory processing disorder and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 10, 289–303. Google Scholar Chermak, G. D., & Musiek, F. E. (1997). Central auditory processing disorders: New perspectives. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing. Google Scholar Fisher, L. I. (1985). Learning disabilities and auditory processing.In R. J. Van Hattum (Ed.), Administration of speech-language services in the schools (pp. 231–292). San Diego, CA: College Hill Press. Google Scholar Jerger, J., Martin, R. C., & Jerger, J. (1987). Specific auditory perceptual dysfunction in a learning disabled child.Ear & Hearing, 8, 78–86. Google Scholar Jerger, J., & Musiek, F. (2000). Report of the consensus conference on the diagnosis of auditory processing disorders in school-aged children.Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 11, 467–474. Google Scholar Keith, R. W. (1986). SCAN: A screening test for auditory processing disorders. San Antonio, TX: Psychological corporation. Google Scholar Keller, W. D. (1992). Auditory processing disorder or attention-deficit disorder?.J. Katz, N. A. Stecker, & D. Henderson (Eds.), Central auditory processing: A transdisci-plinary view (pp. 107–114). St. Louis: Mosby Year Book. Google Scholar Musiek, F. E. (1999). Habilitation and management of auditory processing disorders: Overview of selected procedures.Journal of the American Academy of Audiology, 10, 329–342. Google Scholar Rees, N. S. (1973). Auditory processing factors in language disorders: The view from Procrustes’ bed.Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 38, 304–315. ASHAWireGoogle Scholar Sloan, C. (1992). Language, language learning, and language disorder: Implications for central auditory processing.In J. Katz, N. A. Stecker, & D. Henderson (Eds.), Central auditory processing: A transdisciplinary view (pp. 179–186). St. Louis: Mosby Year Book. Google Scholar Smoski, W. J., Brunt, M. A., & Tannahill, J. C. (1998). Children’s auditory performance scale. Tampa, FL: Educational Audiology Association. Google Scholar Tallal, P., Miller, S., & Fitch, R. (1993). Neurobiological basis of speech: A case for the preeminence of temporal processing.In P. Tallal, A. Galaburda, R. Llinas, & C. von Euler (Eds.), Temporal information processing in the nervous system (pp. 27–47). New York: New York Academy of Sciences. Google Scholar Watson, C. S., & Kidd, G. R. (2002). On the lack of association between basic auditory abilities, speech processing and other cognitive skills.Seminars in Hearing, 23, 85–95. Google Scholar Additional Resources FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 3Issue 2July 2002Pages: 8-12 Get Permissions Add to your Mendeley library History Published in issue: Jul 1, 2002 Metrics Topicsasha-topicsasha-sigsasha-article-typesCopyright & PermissionsCopyright © 2002 American Speech-Language-Hearing AssociationPDF downloadLoading ..." @default.
• W2059019404 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2059019404 creator A5037042890 @default.
• W2059019404 date "2002-07-01" @default.
• W2059019404 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2059019404 title "Adverse Effects of Auditory Processing Disorders on School Performance" @default.
• W2059019404 cites W1970580470 @default.
• W2059019404 cites W1992469689 @default.
• W2059019404 cites W2039529264 @default.
• W2059019404 cites W2124690816 @default.
• W2059019404 cites W2182395099 @default.
• W2059019404 cites W2308512098 @default.
• W2059019404 cites W2329753052 @default.
• W2059019404 cites W23321454 @default.
• W2059019404 cites W2605914463 @default.
• W2059019404 doi "https://doi.org/10.1044/sbi3.2.8" @default.
• W2059019404 hasPublicationYear "2002" @default.
• W2059019404 type Work @default.
• W2059019404 sameAs 2059019404 @default.
• W2059019404 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2059019404 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2059019404 hasAuthorship W2059019404A5037042890 @default.
• W2059019404 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2059019404 hasConcept C177291462 @default.
• W2059019404 hasConcept C46312422 @default.
• W2059019404 hasConcept C548259974 @default.
• W2059019404 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2059019404 hasConceptScore W2059019404C15744967 @default.
• W2059019404 hasConceptScore W2059019404C177291462 @default.
• W2059019404 hasConceptScore W2059019404C46312422 @default.
• W2059019404 hasConceptScore W2059019404C548259974 @default.
• W2059019404 hasConceptScore W2059019404C71924100 @default.
• W2059019404 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2059019404 hasLocation W20590194041 @default.
• W2059019404 hasOpenAccess W2059019404 @default.
• W2059019404 hasPrimaryLocation W20590194041 @default.
• W2059019404 hasRelatedWork W1988779607 @default.
• W2059019404 hasRelatedWork W2028423259 @default.
• W2059019404 hasRelatedWork W2057046008 @default.
• W2059019404 hasRelatedWork W2068056926 @default.
• W2059019404 hasRelatedWork W2072595167 @default.
• W2059019404 hasRelatedWork W2086679116 @default.
• W2059019404 hasRelatedWork W2556882751 @default.
• W2059019404 hasRelatedWork W2626505991 @default.
• W2059019404 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2059019404 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2059019404 hasVolume "3" @default.
• W2059019404 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2059019404 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2059019404 magId "2059019404" @default.
• W2059019404 workType "article" @default.