FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2059631201> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2059631201 endingPage "597" @default.
• W2059631201 startingPage "589" @default.
• W2059631201 abstract "In this article, we describe a method to estimate the spatial dose variation, average dose and mean glandular dose (MGD) for a real breast using Monte Carlo simulation based on cone beam breast computed tomography (CBBCT) images. We present and discuss the dose estimation results for 19 mastectomy breast specimens, 4 homogeneous breast models, 6 ellipsoidal phantoms, and 6 cylindrical phantoms.To validate the Monte Carlo method for dose estimation in CBBCT, we compared the Monte Carlo dose estimates with the thermoluminescent dosimeter measurements at various radial positions in two polycarbonate cylinders (11- and 15-cm in diameter). Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images of 19 mastectomy breast specimens, obtained with a bench-top experimental scanner, were segmented and used to construct 19 structured breast models. Monte Carlo simulation of CBBCT with these models was performed and used to estimate the point doses, average doses, and mean glandular doses for unit open air exposure at the iso-center. Mass based glandularity values were computed and used to investigate their effects on the average doses as well as the mean glandular doses. Average doses for 4 homogeneous breast models were estimated and compared to those of the corresponding structured breast models to investigate the effect of tissue structures. Average doses for ellipsoidal and cylindrical digital phantoms of identical diameter and height were also estimated for various glandularity values and compared with those for the structured breast models.The absorbed dose maps for structured breast models show that doses in the glandular tissue were higher than those in the nearby adipose tissue. Estimated average doses for the homogeneous breast models were almost identical to those for the structured breast models (p=1). Normalized average doses estimated for the ellipsoidal phantoms were similar to those for the structured breast models (root mean square (rms) percentage difference = 1.7%; p = 0.01), whereas those for the cylindrical phantoms were significantly lower (rms percentage difference = 7.7%; p < 0.01). Normalized MGDs were found to decrease with increasing glandularity.Our results indicate that it is sufficient to use homogeneous breast models derived from CBCT generated structured breast models to estimate the average dose. This investigation also shows that ellipsoidal digital phantoms of similar dimensions (diameter and height) and glandularity to actual breasts may be used to represent a real breast to estimate the average breast dose with Monte Carlo simulation. We have also successfully demonstrated the use of structured breast models to estimate the true MGDs and shown that the normalized MGDs decreased with the glandularity as previously reported by other researchers for CBBCT or mammography." @default.
• W2059631201 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2059631201 creator A5013252766 @default.
• W2059631201 creator A5035160285 @default.
• W2059631201 creator A5041078152 @default.
• W2059631201 creator A5055171080 @default.
• W2059631201 creator A5068961920 @default.
• W2059631201 creator A5080817268 @default.
• W2059631201 creator A5081265349 @default.
• W2059631201 creator A5082458012 @default.
• W2059631201 creator A5089309447 @default.
• W2059631201 creator A5039186914 @default.
• W2059631201 date "2011-01-07" @default.
• W2059631201 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W2059631201 title "Radiation doses in cone‐beam breast computed tomography: A Monte Carlo simulation study" @default.
• W2059631201 cites W1659720364 @default.
• W2059631201 cites W1984553821 @default.
• W2059631201 cites W1986419674 @default.
• W2059631201 cites W1989693788 @default.
• W2059631201 cites W1991951294 @default.
• W2059631201 cites W1996248375 @default.
• W2059631201 cites W2007930540 @default.
• W2059631201 cites W2008521294 @default.
• W2059631201 cites W2010194390 @default.
• W2059631201 cites W2012394372 @default.
• W2059631201 cites W2013879982 @default.
• W2059631201 cites W2015969967 @default.
• W2059631201 cites W2022947079 @default.
• W2059631201 cites W2041450408 @default.
• W2059631201 cites W2045685416 @default.
• W2059631201 cites W2055904889 @default.
• W2059631201 cites W2084804876 @default.
• W2059631201 cites W2110445810 @default.
• W2059631201 cites W2123683167 @default.
• W2059631201 cites W2127719655 @default.
• W2059631201 cites W2130582349 @default.
• W2059631201 cites W2133870196 @default.
• W2059631201 cites W2162332320 @default.
• W2059631201 cites W2163683812 @default.
• W2059631201 cites W4234165561 @default.
• W2059631201 doi "https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3521469" @default.
• W2059631201 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/3030614" @default.
• W2059631201 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21452696" @default.
• W2059631201 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W2059631201 type Work @default.
• W2059631201 sameAs 2059631201 @default.
• W2059631201 citedByCount "19" @default.
• W2059631201 countsByYear W20596312012012 @default.
• W2059631201 countsByYear W20596312012013 @default.
• W2059631201 countsByYear W20596312012014 @default.
• W2059631201 countsByYear W20596312012015 @default.
• W2059631201 countsByYear W20596312012016 @default.
• W2059631201 countsByYear W20596312012017 @default.
• W2059631201 countsByYear W20596312012018 @default.
• W2059631201 countsByYear W20596312012019 @default.
• W2059631201 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2059631201 hasAuthorship W2059631201A5013252766 @default.
• W2059631201 hasAuthorship W2059631201A5035160285 @default.
• W2059631201 hasAuthorship W2059631201A5039186914 @default.
• W2059631201 hasAuthorship W2059631201A5041078152 @default.
• W2059631201 hasAuthorship W2059631201A5055171080 @default.
• W2059631201 hasAuthorship W2059631201A5068961920 @default.
• W2059631201 hasAuthorship W2059631201A5080817268 @default.
• W2059631201 hasAuthorship W2059631201A5081265349 @default.
• W2059631201 hasAuthorship W2059631201A5082458012 @default.
• W2059631201 hasAuthorship W2059631201A5089309447 @default.
• W2059631201 hasBestOaLocation W20596312012 @default.
• W2059631201 hasConcept C104293457 @default.
• W2059631201 hasConcept C105636585 @default.
• W2059631201 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2059631201 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2059631201 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W2059631201 hasConcept C19499675 @default.
• W2059631201 hasConcept C2779813781 @default.
• W2059631201 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W2059631201 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2059631201 hasConcept C544519230 @default.
• W2059631201 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2059631201 hasConcept C75088862 @default.
• W2059631201 hasConceptScore W2059631201C104293457 @default.
• W2059631201 hasConceptScore W2059631201C105636585 @default.
• W2059631201 hasConceptScore W2059631201C105795698 @default.
• W2059631201 hasConceptScore W2059631201C126838900 @default.
• W2059631201 hasConceptScore W2059631201C192562407 @default.
• W2059631201 hasConceptScore W2059631201C19499675 @default.
• W2059631201 hasConceptScore W2059631201C2779813781 @default.
• W2059631201 hasConceptScore W2059631201C2989005 @default.
• W2059631201 hasConceptScore W2059631201C33923547 @default.
• W2059631201 hasConceptScore W2059631201C544519230 @default.
• W2059631201 hasConceptScore W2059631201C71924100 @default.
• W2059631201 hasConceptScore W2059631201C75088862 @default.
• W2059631201 hasFunder F4320332161 @default.
• W2059631201 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2059631201 hasLocation W20596312011 @default.
• W2059631201 hasLocation W20596312012 @default.
• W2059631201 hasLocation W20596312013 @default.
• W2059631201 hasLocation W20596312014 @default.
• W2059631201 hasOpenAccess W2059631201 @default.

• next