FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2059656771> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2059656771 endingPage "1404" @default.
• W2059656771 startingPage "1401" @default.
• W2059656771 abstract "In Brief Study Design. Cadaveric imaging study. Objective. We sought to compare the fluoroscopic images produced by 4 different fluoroscopes for image quality and radiation exposure when used for imaging the spine. Summary of Background Data. There are no previous published studies comparing mobile C-arm machines commonly used in clinical practice for imaging the spine. Methods. Anterior-posterior and lateral images of the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine were obtained from a cadaver placed supine on a radiolucent table. The fluoroscopy units used for the study included (1) GE OEC 9900 Elite (2010 model; General Electric Healthcare, Waukesha, WI), (2) Philips BV Pulsera (2009 model; Philips Healthcare, Andover, MA), (3) Philips BV Pulsera (2010 model; Philips Healthcare, Andover, MA), and (4) Siemens Arcadis Avantic (2010 model; Siemens Medical Solutions, Malvern, PA). The images were then downloaded, placed into a randomizer program, and evaluated by a group of spine surgeons and neuroradiologists independently. The reviewers, who were blinded to the fluoroscope the images were from, ranked them from best to worst using a numeric system. In addition, the images were rated according to a quality scale from 1 to 5, with 1 representing the best image quality. The radiation exposure level for the fluoroscopy units was also compared and was based on energy emission. Results. According to the mean values for rank, the following order of best to worst was observed: (1) GE OEC > (2) Philips 2010 > (3) Philips 2009 > (4) Siemans. The exact same order was found when examining the image quality ratings. When comparing the radiation exposure level difference, it was observed that the OEC was the lowest, and there was a minimum 30% decrease in energy emission from the OEC versus the other C-arms studied. Conclusion. This is the first time that the spine image quality and radiation exposure of commonly used C-arm machines have been compared. The OEC was ranked the best, produced the best quality images, and had the least amount of radiation. We sought to compare 4 commonly used fluoroscopy machines for image quality and radiation exposure when used for imaging the entire spine. The images were evaluated by a blinded group of spine surgeons and neuroradiologists independently. The GE OEC 9900 Elite was ranked the best, produced the best quality images, and had the least amount of radiation." @default.
• W2059656771 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2059656771 creator A5010670772 @default.
• W2059656771 creator A5042475501 @default.
• W2059656771 creator A5061796850 @default.
• W2059656771 creator A5077467623 @default.
• W2059656771 creator A5077551653 @default.
• W2059656771 date "2013-07-01" @default.
• W2059656771 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2059656771 title "Comparison of Image Quality and Radiation Exposure From C-Arm Fluoroscopes When Used for Imaging the Spine" @default.
• W2059656771 cites W1018507 @default.
• W2059656771 cites W1691877424 @default.
• W2059656771 cites W1970045875 @default.
• W2059656771 cites W1984775546 @default.
• W2059656771 cites W1985078131 @default.
• W2059656771 cites W1985852944 @default.
• W2059656771 cites W2041267048 @default.
• W2059656771 cites W2089535746 @default.
• W2059656771 cites W2091966481 @default.
• W2059656771 cites W2175787281 @default.
• W2059656771 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0b013e318294e27d" @default.
• W2059656771 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23574814" @default.
• W2059656771 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W2059656771 type Work @default.
• W2059656771 sameAs 2059656771 @default.
• W2059656771 citedByCount "12" @default.
• W2059656771 countsByYear W20596567712014 @default.
• W2059656771 countsByYear W20596567712016 @default.
• W2059656771 countsByYear W20596567712017 @default.
• W2059656771 countsByYear W20596567712018 @default.
• W2059656771 countsByYear W20596567712019 @default.
• W2059656771 countsByYear W20596567712020 @default.
• W2059656771 countsByYear W20596567712021 @default.
• W2059656771 countsByYear W20596567712022 @default.
• W2059656771 countsByYear W20596567712023 @default.
• W2059656771 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2059656771 hasAuthorship W2059656771A5010670772 @default.
• W2059656771 hasAuthorship W2059656771A5042475501 @default.
• W2059656771 hasAuthorship W2059656771A5061796850 @default.
• W2059656771 hasAuthorship W2059656771A5077467623 @default.
• W2059656771 hasAuthorship W2059656771A5077551653 @default.
• W2059656771 hasConcept C100053769 @default.
• W2059656771 hasConcept C115961682 @default.
• W2059656771 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2059656771 hasConcept C125567185 @default.
• W2059656771 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2059656771 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2059656771 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W2059656771 hasConcept C175696284 @default.
• W2059656771 hasConcept C2776805002 @default.
• W2059656771 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
• W2059656771 hasConcept C3017433307 @default.
• W2059656771 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2059656771 hasConcept C44575665 @default.
• W2059656771 hasConcept C55020928 @default.
• W2059656771 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W2059656771 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2059656771 hasConcept C79905245 @default.
• W2059656771 hasConcept C91762617 @default.
• W2059656771 hasConceptScore W2059656771C100053769 @default.
• W2059656771 hasConceptScore W2059656771C115961682 @default.
• W2059656771 hasConceptScore W2059656771C121332964 @default.
• W2059656771 hasConceptScore W2059656771C125567185 @default.
• W2059656771 hasConceptScore W2059656771C126838900 @default.
• W2059656771 hasConceptScore W2059656771C141071460 @default.
• W2059656771 hasConceptScore W2059656771C154945302 @default.
• W2059656771 hasConceptScore W2059656771C175696284 @default.
• W2059656771 hasConceptScore W2059656771C2776805002 @default.
• W2059656771 hasConceptScore W2059656771C2989005 @default.
• W2059656771 hasConceptScore W2059656771C3017433307 @default.
• W2059656771 hasConceptScore W2059656771C41008148 @default.
• W2059656771 hasConceptScore W2059656771C44575665 @default.
• W2059656771 hasConceptScore W2059656771C55020928 @default.
• W2059656771 hasConceptScore W2059656771C62520636 @default.
• W2059656771 hasConceptScore W2059656771C71924100 @default.
• W2059656771 hasConceptScore W2059656771C79905245 @default.
• W2059656771 hasConceptScore W2059656771C91762617 @default.
• W2059656771 hasIssue "16" @default.
• W2059656771 hasLocation W20596567711 @default.
• W2059656771 hasLocation W20596567712 @default.
• W2059656771 hasOpenAccess W2059656771 @default.
• W2059656771 hasPrimaryLocation W20596567711 @default.
• W2059656771 hasRelatedWork W1992445234 @default.
• W2059656771 hasRelatedWork W2093970568 @default.
• W2059656771 hasRelatedWork W2108519856 @default.
• W2059656771 hasRelatedWork W2415199288 @default.
• W2059656771 hasRelatedWork W2518482761 @default.
• W2059656771 hasRelatedWork W2578157909 @default.
• W2059656771 hasRelatedWork W2785297504 @default.
• W2059656771 hasRelatedWork W2995479800 @default.
• W2059656771 hasRelatedWork W3199558840 @default.
• W2059656771 hasRelatedWork W4292282799 @default.
• W2059656771 hasVolume "38" @default.
• W2059656771 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2059656771 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2059656771 magId "2059656771" @default.
• W2059656771 workType "article" @default.