FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2059677228> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2059677228 endingPage "4802408" @default.
• W2059677228 startingPage "4802408" @default.
• W2059677228 abstract "Electrical (mechanical) butt and edge joints of a stacked REBCO conductor within a metal jacket have been investigated as candidates for demountable (remountable) electrical joints within demountable high-temperature superconducting magnets. This paper summarizes recent progress in the R&D of the two electrical joints. First, we have described recent R&D for the butt joint. We have previously established fabrication methods for the butt joint samples. In this paper, we have tried to establish a predictive method of joint resistance for a large-scale stacked REBCO conductor within a metal jacket by using small-scale experiments and current distribution analyses. For this purpose, we evaluated joint resistivity, particularly in the butt joint where an indium film is inserted between joint surfaces. Based on the small-scale experiments and 3-D current distribution analyses, the joint resistivity between the contact surface and the indium film inserted into the joint section is evaluated to be 1.1 × 10 <sup xmlns:mml=http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML xmlns:xlink=http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink>-12</sup> Ωm <sup xmlns:mml=http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML xmlns:xlink=http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink>2</sup> . According to the discussion based on the results, the joint resistance for a 100-kA-class REBCO conductor is estimated to be 3.7 nΩ, which is a reasonably acceptable value from the viewpoint of electric power for cooling. Second, we recapitulate present R&D for the edge joint. In the case of the edge joint, adequate methods for fabricating samples had not been established because this joint has only been recently proposed. In a previous study, the experimentally measured joint resistance of the edge joint was much higher than predicted. We expect that the reason for the discrepancy is degradation of the conductor edge during the fabrication process and strains due to forces during the joint test. In addition, poor fabrication of the joint faces resulted in limited local area contact across the joint. In this paper, we improved the methods of fabrication and the structure of the test conductors based on numerical analysis. We then carried out a testing program of the edge joint of a stacked GdBCO conductor within a copper jacket fabricated with the improved process. The experimentally evaluated joint resistance agreed with numerical predictions. Therefore, the satisfactory performance of the edge joint was demonstrated in this paper." @default.
• W2059677228 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2059677228 creator A5023964333 @default.
• W2059677228 creator A5028865583 @default.
• W2059677228 creator A5043573545 @default.
• W2059677228 creator A5043885940 @default.
• W2059677228 date "2013-06-01" @default.
• W2059677228 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W2059677228 title "Structure Improvement and Joint Resistance Estimation in Demountable Butt and Edge Joints of a Stacked REBCO Conductor Within a Metal Jacket" @default.
• W2059677228 cites W14777418 @default.
• W2059677228 cites W1974492080 @default.
• W2059677228 cites W1975182940 @default.
• W2059677228 cites W2009271081 @default.
• W2059677228 cites W2011090586 @default.
• W2059677228 cites W2068684506 @default.
• W2059677228 cites W2116088691 @default.
• W2059677228 cites W2122092937 @default.
• W2059677228 cites W2138113767 @default.
• W2059677228 cites W2142877605 @default.
• W2059677228 cites W2154305771 @default.
• W2059677228 cites W2496577402 @default.
• W2059677228 cites W4237716869 @default.
• W2059677228 cites W44777205 @default.
• W2059677228 doi "https://doi.org/10.1109/tasc.2013.2244197" @default.
• W2059677228 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W2059677228 type Work @default.
• W2059677228 sameAs 2059677228 @default.
• W2059677228 citedByCount "14" @default.
• W2059677228 countsByYear W20596772282014 @default.
• W2059677228 countsByYear W20596772282015 @default.
• W2059677228 countsByYear W20596772282016 @default.
• W2059677228 countsByYear W20596772282018 @default.
• W2059677228 countsByYear W20596772282020 @default.
• W2059677228 countsByYear W20596772282021 @default.
• W2059677228 countsByYear W20596772282022 @default.
• W2059677228 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2059677228 hasAuthorship W2059677228A5023964333 @default.
• W2059677228 hasAuthorship W2059677228A5028865583 @default.
• W2059677228 hasAuthorship W2059677228A5043573545 @default.
• W2059677228 hasAuthorship W2059677228A5043885940 @default.
• W2059677228 hasConcept C119599485 @default.
• W2059677228 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2059677228 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2059677228 hasConcept C159985019 @default.
• W2059677228 hasConcept C162307627 @default.
• W2059677228 hasConcept C18555067 @default.
• W2059677228 hasConcept C191897082 @default.
• W2059677228 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
• W2059677228 hasConcept C202374169 @default.
• W2059677228 hasConcept C26873012 @default.
• W2059677228 hasConcept C2778478046 @default.
• W2059677228 hasConcept C34800285 @default.
• W2059677228 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2059677228 hasConcept C49040817 @default.
• W2059677228 hasConcept C54101563 @default.
• W2059677228 hasConcept C543292547 @default.
• W2059677228 hasConcept C66938386 @default.
• W2059677228 hasConcept C69990965 @default.
• W2059677228 hasConcept C76155785 @default.
• W2059677228 hasConcept C94857076 @default.
• W2059677228 hasConcept C94870803 @default.
• W2059677228 hasConceptScore W2059677228C119599485 @default.
• W2059677228 hasConceptScore W2059677228C121332964 @default.
• W2059677228 hasConceptScore W2059677228C127413603 @default.
• W2059677228 hasConceptScore W2059677228C159985019 @default.
• W2059677228 hasConceptScore W2059677228C162307627 @default.
• W2059677228 hasConceptScore W2059677228C18555067 @default.
• W2059677228 hasConceptScore W2059677228C191897082 @default.
• W2059677228 hasConceptScore W2059677228C192562407 @default.
• W2059677228 hasConceptScore W2059677228C202374169 @default.
• W2059677228 hasConceptScore W2059677228C26873012 @default.
• W2059677228 hasConceptScore W2059677228C2778478046 @default.
• W2059677228 hasConceptScore W2059677228C34800285 @default.
• W2059677228 hasConceptScore W2059677228C41008148 @default.
• W2059677228 hasConceptScore W2059677228C49040817 @default.
• W2059677228 hasConceptScore W2059677228C54101563 @default.
• W2059677228 hasConceptScore W2059677228C543292547 @default.
• W2059677228 hasConceptScore W2059677228C66938386 @default.
• W2059677228 hasConceptScore W2059677228C69990965 @default.
• W2059677228 hasConceptScore W2059677228C76155785 @default.
• W2059677228 hasConceptScore W2059677228C94857076 @default.
• W2059677228 hasConceptScore W2059677228C94870803 @default.
• W2059677228 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2059677228 hasLocation W20596772281 @default.
• W2059677228 hasOpenAccess W2059677228 @default.
• W2059677228 hasPrimaryLocation W20596772281 @default.
• W2059677228 hasRelatedWork W1534340510 @default.
• W2059677228 hasRelatedWork W2059677228 @default.
• W2059677228 hasRelatedWork W2080594456 @default.
• W2059677228 hasRelatedWork W2094749200 @default.
• W2059677228 hasRelatedWork W2107998775 @default.
• W2059677228 hasRelatedWork W2119628309 @default.
• W2059677228 hasRelatedWork W2335627939 @default.
• W2059677228 hasRelatedWork W2393490813 @default.
• W2059677228 hasRelatedWork W2954843042 @default.
• W2059677228 hasRelatedWork W4297790111 @default.
• W2059677228 hasVolume "23" @default.
• W2059677228 isParatext "false" @default.

• next