FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2059791858> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2059791858 endingPage "1542" @default.
• W2059791858 startingPage "1536" @default.
• W2059791858 abstract "Study Design. This retrospective study analyzed the outcome of 44 patients who had decompression, pedicle screw-rod fixation, and fusion for Grades 1 and 2 spondylolytic spondylolisthesis. Objective. To evaluate the outcome of two methods for stabilization and fusion: posterolateral fusion and circumferential fusion involving posterior lumbar interbody fusion and posterolateral fusion for low grades of isthmic spondylolisthesis. Summary of Background Data. It has been suggested that stabilization with instrumented fusion is somewhat unpredictable due to lack of anterior support. Does circumferential fusion using posterior lumbar interbody fusion circumvent all the problems, and is it better than posterolateral fusion clinically? Methods. A single surgeon treated 21 patients with instrumented posterolateral fusion and 23 patients with instrumented circumferential fusion, (i.e., posterior lumbar interbody fusion, and posterolateral fusion. These two groups were compared for clinical outcome, fusion rate, and correction of slippage. Results. The minimum follow-up period for the patients was 2.1 years. The clinical satisfactory outcome on the Oswestry index was 81% for posterolateral fusion and 69% for posterior lumbar interbody fusion. The subjective outcome was 86% and 65%, respectively, for the two groups (P > 0.05). However, a consideration of subjective scores showed that three patients (14.3%) in posterolateral fusion group and eight patients (34.8%) in posterior lumbar interbody fusion group had an unsatisfactory outcome (P = 0.0135), which was very significant. There were two nonunions in the posterolateral fusion group and none in the posterior lumbar interbody fusion group (P > 0.05). The correction of slippage and the loss of correction at the last follow-up assessment was better in the posterior lumbar interbody fusion group, although this was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Radicular symptoms and neurologic improvement were statistically similar between the two groups. Conclusions. Posterolateral fusion has a better clinical outcome in low grades of isthmic spondylolisthesis, although posterior lumbar interbody fusion is more predictable in maintaining correction and achieving union. Careful patient selection is needed for each operation, and adjacent level disc degeneration may influence the procedure offered to the patient." @default.
• W2059791858 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2059791858 creator A5012556252 @default.
• W2059791858 creator A5059143489 @default.
• W2059791858 date "2002-07-01" @default.
• W2059791858 modified "2023-10-07" @default.
• W2059791858 title "Outcome of Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Posterolateral Fusion for Spondylolytic Spondylolisthesis" @default.
• W2059791858 cites W122586398 @default.
• W2059791858 cites W1872119568 @default.
• W2059791858 cites W1965618802 @default.
• W2059791858 cites W1966935626 @default.
• W2059791858 cites W1972406387 @default.
• W2059791858 cites W1975999758 @default.
• W2059791858 cites W1980165018 @default.
• W2059791858 cites W1982276813 @default.
• W2059791858 cites W1991446780 @default.
• W2059791858 cites W1996406512 @default.
• W2059791858 cites W2002314607 @default.
• W2059791858 cites W2004475620 @default.
• W2059791858 cites W2013323602 @default.
• W2059791858 cites W2035350015 @default.
• W2059791858 cites W2037816263 @default.
• W2059791858 cites W2054765169 @default.
• W2059791858 cites W2056789421 @default.
• W2059791858 cites W2066438789 @default.
• W2059791858 cites W2067468943 @default.
• W2059791858 cites W2096941142 @default.
• W2059791858 cites W2104069038 @default.
• W2059791858 cites W2115293284 @default.
• W2059791858 cites W2145513209 @default.
• W2059791858 cites W2170332928 @default.
• W2059791858 cites W2289536229 @default.
• W2059791858 cites W2413284401 @default.
• W2059791858 cites W4241845683 @default.
• W2059791858 cites W4250333136 @default.
• W2059791858 doi "https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200207150-00011" @default.
• W2059791858 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12131714" @default.
• W2059791858 hasPublicationYear "2002" @default.
• W2059791858 type Work @default.
• W2059791858 sameAs 2059791858 @default.
• W2059791858 citedByCount "173" @default.
• W2059791858 countsByYear W20597918582012 @default.
• W2059791858 countsByYear W20597918582013 @default.
• W2059791858 countsByYear W20597918582014 @default.
• W2059791858 countsByYear W20597918582015 @default.
• W2059791858 countsByYear W20597918582016 @default.
• W2059791858 countsByYear W20597918582017 @default.
• W2059791858 countsByYear W20597918582018 @default.
• W2059791858 countsByYear W20597918582019 @default.
• W2059791858 countsByYear W20597918582020 @default.
• W2059791858 countsByYear W20597918582021 @default.
• W2059791858 countsByYear W20597918582022 @default.
• W2059791858 countsByYear W20597918582023 @default.
• W2059791858 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2059791858 hasAuthorship W2059791858A5012556252 @default.
• W2059791858 hasAuthorship W2059791858A5059143489 @default.
• W2059791858 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2059791858 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2059791858 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2059791858 hasConcept C158525013 @default.
• W2059791858 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W2059791858 hasConcept C2776623965 @default.
• W2059791858 hasConcept C2779480328 @default.
• W2059791858 hasConcept C2780307688 @default.
• W2059791858 hasConcept C2780375110 @default.
• W2059791858 hasConcept C2781298600 @default.
• W2059791858 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2059791858 hasConcept C44575665 @default.
• W2059791858 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2059791858 hasConceptScore W2059791858C138885662 @default.
• W2059791858 hasConceptScore W2059791858C141071460 @default.
• W2059791858 hasConceptScore W2059791858C142724271 @default.
• W2059791858 hasConceptScore W2059791858C158525013 @default.
• W2059791858 hasConceptScore W2059791858C204787440 @default.
• W2059791858 hasConceptScore W2059791858C2776623965 @default.
• W2059791858 hasConceptScore W2059791858C2779480328 @default.
• W2059791858 hasConceptScore W2059791858C2780307688 @default.
• W2059791858 hasConceptScore W2059791858C2780375110 @default.
• W2059791858 hasConceptScore W2059791858C2781298600 @default.
• W2059791858 hasConceptScore W2059791858C41895202 @default.
• W2059791858 hasConceptScore W2059791858C44575665 @default.
• W2059791858 hasConceptScore W2059791858C71924100 @default.
• W2059791858 hasIssue "14" @default.
• W2059791858 hasLocation W20597918581 @default.
• W2059791858 hasLocation W20597918582 @default.
• W2059791858 hasOpenAccess W2059791858 @default.
• W2059791858 hasPrimaryLocation W20597918581 @default.
• W2059791858 hasRelatedWork W1994131105 @default.
• W2059791858 hasRelatedWork W2052875375 @default.
• W2059791858 hasRelatedWork W2087481446 @default.
• W2059791858 hasRelatedWork W2133520721 @default.
• W2059791858 hasRelatedWork W2144168973 @default.
• W2059791858 hasRelatedWork W2164047620 @default.
• W2059791858 hasRelatedWork W2361381842 @default.
• W2059791858 hasRelatedWork W2369975806 @default.
• W2059791858 hasRelatedWork W2808940856 @default.
• W2059791858 hasRelatedWork W3016703051 @default.
• W2059791858 hasVolume "27" @default.

• next