FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2059927829> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2059927829 endingPage "1170" @default.
• W2059927829 startingPage "1167" @default.
• W2059927829 abstract "Le virus de l'hépatite A (VHA) a èté concentré, à partir d'eaux expérimentalement contaminées, par la méthode d'adsorption/élution sur membrane d'esters de cellulose, suivie d'une concentration de l'éluat par le polyéthylène glycol 6000. Le VHA est détecté à chaque étape par radioimmunologie. L'efficacité d'adsorption est supérieure à 90%, aux pH compris entre 3 et 4. Pour l'élution avec l'extrait de boeuf à 3%, de même que pour le tampon glycine 0,2 M, les différences observées en fonction du pH (de 7,5 à 11,5) et du nombre de passages de l'éluant à travers le filtre (1 ou 3) ne sont pas statistiquement significatives. L'extrait de boeuf à 3% a donné de meilleurs résultats que le tampon glycine 0.2 M. D'autre part, le VHA s'est multiplié en culture cellulaire après concentration par ce procédé. Viral hepatitis type A is the most prevalent waterborne disease in U.S.A. and the number of cases has been increasing in recent years (Melnick et al., 1978). Till now, few works were performed on Hepatitis A Virus (HAV) concentration in water (Hejkal et al., 1982, Elkana et al., 1983). In this paper the filter adsorption-elution method, widely used with other viruses (Wallis and Melnick, 1967; Fields et Metcalf, 1975; Smith and Gerba, 1982), was selected to concentrate HAV from experimentally-contaminated distilled water. Filtration was performed through two cellulose membranes (RAWP 04700 and HAWP 04700 Millipore). Eluate or filtrate viruses were precipitated by polyethylene glycol 6000. HAV is detected by solid phase radioimmunoassay according to a previously described method (Deloince et al., 1982). Figure 1 shows the results of adsorbing HAV at different pH levels. Analysis of variance pointed out that, for the pH levels between 3 and 4, the differences were not significant (P = 0.05). Table 1 shows the effects of pH and number of passages of 3% beef extract or 0.2 M glycin buffer on HAV elution. For both eluents the differences in function of pH levels and number of passages of eluent through the membrane were not significant (variance analysis P = 0.05). On the other hand, the comparison between the two eluents pointed out the higher efficiency of beef extract (t-test, P = 0.001). After this procedure, HAV replication occurred in human hepatocarcinoma cells PLC/PRF/5 (Fig. 2) inoculated according to a previously described method (Crance et al., 1983). As poliovirus (Sobsey et al., 1973), HAV adsorption is the most efficient at acid pH levels. Between pH 4.5 and 5, the remarkable adsorption decrease might be related to the inversion of the HAV electrostatic charges sign, i.e. to the occurrence of an isoelectric point. The HAV elution is different from the poliovirus one, the efficiency of which increased with pH (Wallis et al., 1972) and eluent passage numbers (Farrah et al., 1976). That might suggest that from pH 7.5, both the HAV particles and membranes have negative charges which give enough repulsive forces to allow a good elution efficiency. Improvement of HAV elution efficiency by beef extract is similar to a result obtained with poliovirus by Landry et al. (1978). This effect might be explained by the proteinous material presence in beef extract. HAV replication in cell cultures shows the biological properties preservation after this procedure." @default.
• W2059927829 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2059927829 creator A5005288538 @default.
• W2059927829 creator A5022232788 @default.
• W2059927829 creator A5027687550 @default.
• W2059927829 creator A5034447986 @default.
• W2059927829 creator A5084216330 @default.
• W2059927829 creator A5088587529 @default.
• W2059927829 date "1985-01-01" @default.
• W2059927829 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
• W2059927829 title "Concentration du virus de l'hepatite a sur des membranes de cellulose" @default.
• W2059927829 cites W1493202771 @default.
• W2059927829 cites W1942626249 @default.
• W2059927829 cites W1983226447 @default.
• W2059927829 cites W1987039967 @default.
• W2059927829 cites W1988989701 @default.
• W2059927829 cites W2012160727 @default.
• W2059927829 cites W2046532431 @default.
• W2059927829 cites W2052167124 @default.
• W2059927829 cites W2056316692 @default.
• W2059927829 cites W2076431922 @default.
• W2059927829 cites W2121891872 @default.
• W2059927829 cites W2135739694 @default.
• W2059927829 cites W2580601175 @default.
• W2059927829 cites W4255324449 @default.
• W2059927829 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(85)90353-7" @default.
• W2059927829 hasPublicationYear "1985" @default.
• W2059927829 type Work @default.
• W2059927829 sameAs 2059927829 @default.
• W2059927829 citedByCount "11" @default.
• W2059927829 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2059927829 hasAuthorship W2059927829A5005288538 @default.
• W2059927829 hasAuthorship W2059927829A5022232788 @default.
• W2059927829 hasAuthorship W2059927829A5027687550 @default.
• W2059927829 hasAuthorship W2059927829A5034447986 @default.
• W2059927829 hasAuthorship W2059927829A5084216330 @default.
• W2059927829 hasAuthorship W2059927829A5088587529 @default.
• W2059927829 hasConcept C13965031 @default.
• W2059927829 hasConcept C150394285 @default.
• W2059927829 hasConcept C153911025 @default.
• W2059927829 hasConcept C159047783 @default.
• W2059927829 hasConcept C178790620 @default.
• W2059927829 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2059927829 hasConcept C2522874641 @default.
• W2059927829 hasConcept C2779251873 @default.
• W2059927829 hasConcept C2779429693 @default.
• W2059927829 hasConcept C2994508507 @default.
• W2059927829 hasConcept C3019983190 @default.
• W2059927829 hasConcept C41625074 @default.
• W2059927829 hasConcept C43617362 @default.
• W2059927829 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
• W2059927829 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2059927829 hasConceptScore W2059927829C13965031 @default.
• W2059927829 hasConceptScore W2059927829C150394285 @default.
• W2059927829 hasConceptScore W2059927829C153911025 @default.
• W2059927829 hasConceptScore W2059927829C159047783 @default.
• W2059927829 hasConceptScore W2059927829C178790620 @default.
• W2059927829 hasConceptScore W2059927829C185592680 @default.
• W2059927829 hasConceptScore W2059927829C2522874641 @default.
• W2059927829 hasConceptScore W2059927829C2779251873 @default.
• W2059927829 hasConceptScore W2059927829C2779429693 @default.
• W2059927829 hasConceptScore W2059927829C2994508507 @default.
• W2059927829 hasConceptScore W2059927829C3019983190 @default.
• W2059927829 hasConceptScore W2059927829C41625074 @default.
• W2059927829 hasConceptScore W2059927829C43617362 @default.
• W2059927829 hasConceptScore W2059927829C55493867 @default.
• W2059927829 hasConceptScore W2059927829C86803240 @default.
• W2059927829 hasIssue "9" @default.
• W2059927829 hasLocation W20599278291 @default.
• W2059927829 hasOpenAccess W2059927829 @default.
• W2059927829 hasPrimaryLocation W20599278291 @default.
• W2059927829 hasRelatedWork W1493012035 @default.
• W2059927829 hasRelatedWork W1831530121 @default.
• W2059927829 hasRelatedWork W1970609383 @default.
• W2059927829 hasRelatedWork W2171551638 @default.
• W2059927829 hasRelatedWork W2332274829 @default.
• W2059927829 hasRelatedWork W2338173031 @default.
• W2059927829 hasRelatedWork W2370212030 @default.
• W2059927829 hasRelatedWork W2416560953 @default.
• W2059927829 hasRelatedWork W4294845532 @default.
• W2059927829 hasRelatedWork W4362700434 @default.
• W2059927829 hasVolume "19" @default.
• W2059927829 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2059927829 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2059927829 magId "2059927829" @default.
• W2059927829 workType "article" @default.