FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2059998394> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2059998394 abstract "To use a decision-analytic model to determine the incremental costs and outcomes of alternative oral cancer screening programmes conducted in a primary care environment.The cost-effectiveness of oral cancer screening programmes in a number of primary care environments was simulated using a decision analysis model. Primary data on actual resource use and costs were collected by case note review in two hospitals. Additional data needed to inform the model were obtained from published costs, from systematic reviews and by expert opinion using the Trial Roulette approach. The value of future research was determined using expected value of perfect information (EVPI) for the decision to screen and for each of the model inputs.Hypothetical screening programmes conducted in a number of primary care settings. Eight strategies were compared: (A) no screen; (B) invitational screen--general medical practice; (C) invitational screen--general dental practice; (D) opportunistic screen--general medical practice; (E) opportunistic screen--general dental practice; (F) opportunistic high-risk screen--general medical practice; (G) opportunistic high-risk screen--general dental practice; and (H) invitational screen--specialist.A hypothetical population over the age of 40 years was studied.The main measures were mean lifetime costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) of each alternative screening scenario and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) to determine the additional costs and benefits of each strategy over another.No screening (strategy A) was always the cheapest option. Strategies B, C, E and H were never cost-effective and were ruled out by dominance or extended dominance. Of the remaining strategies, the ICER for the whole population (age 49-79 years) ranged from pound 15,790 to pound 25,961 per QALY. Modelling a 20% reduction in disease progression always gave the lowest ICERs. Cost-effectiveness acceptability curves showed that there is considerable uncertainty in the optimal decision identified by the ICER, depending on both the maximum amount that the NHS may be prepared to pay and the impact that treatment has on the annual malignancy transformation rate. Overall, however, high-risk opportunistic screening by a general dental or medical practitioner (strategies F and G) may be cost-effective. EVPIs were high for all parameters with population values ranging from pound 8 million to pound 462 million. However, the values were significantly higher in males than females but also varied depending on malignant transformation rate, effects of treatment and willingness to pay. Partial EVPIs showed the highest values for malignant transformation rate, disease progression, self-referral and costs of cancer treatment.Opportunistic high-risk screening, particularly in general dental practice, may be cost-effective. This screening may more effectively be targeted to younger age groups, particularly 40-60 year olds. However, there is considerable uncertainty in the parameters used in the model, particularly malignant transformation rate, disease progression, patterns of self-referral and costs. Further study is needed on malignant transformation rates of oral potentially malignant lesions and to determine the outcome of treatment of oral potentially malignant lesions. Evidence has been published to suggest that intervention has no greater benefit than 'watch and wait'. Hence a properly planned randomised controlled trial may be justified. Research is also needed into the rates of progression of oral cancer and on referral pathways from primary to secondary care and their effects on delay and stage of presentation." @default.
• W2059998394 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2059998394 creator A5000023013 @default.
• W2059998394 creator A5006630051 @default.
• W2059998394 creator A5019224639 @default.
• W2059998394 creator A5049679176 @default.
• W2059998394 creator A5053077563 @default.
• W2059998394 creator A5057683825 @default.
• W2059998394 creator A5075694263 @default.
• W2059998394 date "2006-04-01" @default.
• W2059998394 modified "2023-10-12" @default.
• W2059998394 title "The cost-effectiveness of screening for oral cancer in primary care" @default.
• W2059998394 cites W1480287350 @default.
• W2059998394 cites W1585229448 @default.
• W2059998394 cites W1983500792 @default.
• W2059998394 cites W2028532700 @default.
• W2059998394 cites W2042887042 @default.
• W2059998394 cites W2087025145 @default.
• W2059998394 cites W2106203584 @default.
• W2059998394 cites W2114258283 @default.
• W2059998394 doi "https://doi.org/10.3310/hta10140" @default.
• W2059998394 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16707071" @default.
• W2059998394 hasPublicationYear "2006" @default.
• W2059998394 type Work @default.
• W2059998394 sameAs 2059998394 @default.
• W2059998394 citedByCount "161" @default.
• W2059998394 countsByYear W20599983942012 @default.
• W2059998394 countsByYear W20599983942013 @default.
• W2059998394 countsByYear W20599983942014 @default.
• W2059998394 countsByYear W20599983942015 @default.
• W2059998394 countsByYear W20599983942016 @default.
• W2059998394 countsByYear W20599983942017 @default.
• W2059998394 countsByYear W20599983942018 @default.
• W2059998394 countsByYear W20599983942019 @default.
• W2059998394 countsByYear W20599983942020 @default.
• W2059998394 countsByYear W20599983942021 @default.
• W2059998394 countsByYear W20599983942022 @default.
• W2059998394 countsByYear W20599983942023 @default.
• W2059998394 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2059998394 hasAuthorship W2059998394A5000023013 @default.
• W2059998394 hasAuthorship W2059998394A5006630051 @default.
• W2059998394 hasAuthorship W2059998394A5019224639 @default.
• W2059998394 hasAuthorship W2059998394A5049679176 @default.
• W2059998394 hasAuthorship W2059998394A5053077563 @default.
• W2059998394 hasAuthorship W2059998394A5057683825 @default.
• W2059998394 hasAuthorship W2059998394A5075694263 @default.
• W2059998394 hasBestOaLocation W20599983941 @default.
• W2059998394 hasConcept C112930515 @default.
• W2059998394 hasConcept C127454912 @default.
• W2059998394 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2059998394 hasConcept C162118730 @default.
• W2059998394 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W2059998394 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2059998394 hasConcept C3019080777 @default.
• W2059998394 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2059998394 hasConcept C64332521 @default.
• W2059998394 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2059998394 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2059998394 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2059998394 hasConceptScore W2059998394C112930515 @default.
• W2059998394 hasConceptScore W2059998394C127454912 @default.
• W2059998394 hasConceptScore W2059998394C144133560 @default.
• W2059998394 hasConceptScore W2059998394C162118730 @default.
• W2059998394 hasConceptScore W2059998394C18903297 @default.
• W2059998394 hasConceptScore W2059998394C2908647359 @default.
• W2059998394 hasConceptScore W2059998394C3019080777 @default.
• W2059998394 hasConceptScore W2059998394C512399662 @default.
• W2059998394 hasConceptScore W2059998394C64332521 @default.
• W2059998394 hasConceptScore W2059998394C71924100 @default.
• W2059998394 hasConceptScore W2059998394C86803240 @default.
• W2059998394 hasConceptScore W2059998394C99454951 @default.
• W2059998394 hasFunder F4320334661 @default.
• W2059998394 hasIssue "14" @default.
• W2059998394 hasLocation W20599983941 @default.
• W2059998394 hasLocation W20599983942 @default.
• W2059998394 hasLocation W20599983943 @default.
• W2059998394 hasOpenAccess W2059998394 @default.
• W2059998394 hasPrimaryLocation W20599983941 @default.
• W2059998394 hasRelatedWork W1974907410 @default.
• W2059998394 hasRelatedWork W1990784511 @default.
• W2059998394 hasRelatedWork W2152883685 @default.
• W2059998394 hasRelatedWork W2161276171 @default.
• W2059998394 hasRelatedWork W2167306911 @default.
• W2059998394 hasRelatedWork W2592429212 @default.
• W2059998394 hasRelatedWork W2766200263 @default.
• W2059998394 hasRelatedWork W2884375869 @default.
• W2059998394 hasRelatedWork W3092367821 @default.
• W2059998394 hasRelatedWork W3147996782 @default.
• W2059998394 hasVolume "10" @default.
• W2059998394 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2059998394 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2059998394 magId "2059998394" @default.
• W2059998394 workType "article" @default.