FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2060256948> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2060256948 endingPage "751" @default.
• W2060256948 startingPage "731" @default.
• W2060256948 abstract "Purpose – Bridging indistinct relationships and online loyalty has become an important strategy for online interest-based communities' operators and firms. The objective of this study is to draw on the elaboration likelihood model (ELM) to advance our understanding of the influences on the development of relationship quality and the consequent impact on members' loyalty to online communities. Design/methodology/approach – To test the hypotheses the authors identified and selected four interest-based online communities in Taiwan. The online survey yielded 331 completed questionnaires from members of interest-based online communities and the authors analysed the results using the structural equation modelling approach. Findings – The findings show that argument quality and source credibility positively affect members' perceived relationship quality, which has a positive and significant effect on behavioural loyalty, and personal relevance and user expertise positively moderate the relationship between argument quality and relationship quality and negatively moderate the relationship between source credibility and relationship quality. Research limitations/implications – While this study has produced meaningful insights for investigating the informational processing influences on relationship quality and subsequent behavioural loyalty through the ELM perspective, the samples may not allow researchers to draw more general conclusions across different types of community contexts. The data were collected only from interest-based communities. Examining this model across different types of online communities, such as transaction-, relationship-, or fantasy-based ones, would help establish the generalisability of these results beyond the current context. Practical implications – The present study can help managers of online communities recognise the differential effects of these information processes across a user population and customise optimal strategies that best fit the unique characteristics of their community members. For making argument quality more convincing, Toulmin's (1958) model of argumentation could serve as an appropriate mechanism. Moreover it is crucial to provide various indicators of source credibility for information content. Originality/value – The paper addresses a gap in the research by using ELM to better understand the influences on the development of relationship quality and the impact on members' loyalty. Understanding these dynamics is critical since it: enriches the relationship marketing and information management literature by addressing the role of information content in the management and success of online communities; helps online community managers customise optimal strategies for their members, thereby fostering members' loyalty and their platform's competitive advantage; and illuminates two influential processes that can achieve the desired attitude change in the context of online communities." @default.
• W2060256948 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2060256948 creator A5015026861 @default.
• W2060256948 creator A5033300988 @default.
• W2060256948 date "2013-09-23" @default.
• W2060256948 modified "2023-10-14" @default.
• W2060256948 title "Bridging indistinct relationships and online loyalty: evidence from online interest-based communities" @default.
• W2060256948 cites W1501852978 @default.
• W2060256948 cites W1505596080 @default.
• W2060256948 cites W1510078790 @default.
• W2060256948 cites W1567491469 @default.
• W2060256948 cites W1579626606 @default.
• W2060256948 cites W1590086943 @default.
• W2060256948 cites W1607210182 @default.
• W2060256948 cites W1764161293 @default.
• W2060256948 cites W1971089268 @default.
• W2060256948 cites W1977735025 @default.
• W2060256948 cites W1981635817 @default.
• W2060256948 cites W1984715610 @default.
• W2060256948 cites W1984742863 @default.
• W2060256948 cites W1986676478 @default.
• W2060256948 cites W1989698229 @default.
• W2060256948 cites W1994699575 @default.
• W2060256948 cites W1996343386 @default.
• W2060256948 cites W1997254581 @default.
• W2060256948 cites W2003413782 @default.
• W2060256948 cites W2013304147 @default.
• W2060256948 cites W2014423523 @default.
• W2060256948 cites W2024855846 @default.
• W2060256948 cites W2029186508 @default.
• W2060256948 cites W2053435890 @default.
• W2060256948 cites W2058559948 @default.
• W2060256948 cites W2058599614 @default.
• W2060256948 cites W2069442042 @default.
• W2060256948 cites W2071402614 @default.
• W2060256948 cites W2072586921 @default.
• W2060256948 cites W2075023796 @default.
• W2060256948 cites W2076100342 @default.
• W2060256948 cites W2077054967 @default.
• W2060256948 cites W2077221910 @default.
• W2060256948 cites W2082769179 @default.
• W2060256948 cites W2082806247 @default.
• W2060256948 cites W2085744223 @default.
• W2060256948 cites W2092091472 @default.
• W2060256948 cites W2110416264 @default.
• W2060256948 cites W2111865761 @default.
• W2060256948 cites W2122912498 @default.
• W2060256948 cites W2124212711 @default.
• W2060256948 cites W2127405484 @default.
• W2060256948 cites W2128469360 @default.
• W2060256948 cites W2131069089 @default.
• W2060256948 cites W2137467455 @default.
• W2060256948 cites W2143952996 @default.
• W2060256948 cites W2146217571 @default.
• W2060256948 cites W2153932359 @default.
• W2060256948 cites W2155103649 @default.
• W2060256948 cites W2159674550 @default.
• W2060256948 cites W2166809985 @default.
• W2060256948 cites W2289646608 @default.
• W2060256948 cites W2573992543 @default.
• W2060256948 cites W3123150028 @default.
• W2060256948 cites W4211068185 @default.
• W2060256948 cites W4235678817 @default.
• W2060256948 cites W4256334145 @default.
• W2060256948 doi "https://doi.org/10.1108/oir-01-2011-0220" @default.
• W2060256948 hasPublicationYear "2013" @default.
• W2060256948 type Work @default.
• W2060256948 sameAs 2060256948 @default.
• W2060256948 citedByCount "24" @default.
• W2060256948 countsByYear W20602569482015 @default.
• W2060256948 countsByYear W20602569482016 @default.
• W2060256948 countsByYear W20602569482017 @default.
• W2060256948 countsByYear W20602569482018 @default.
• W2060256948 countsByYear W20602569482019 @default.
• W2060256948 countsByYear W20602569482020 @default.
• W2060256948 countsByYear W20602569482021 @default.
• W2060256948 countsByYear W20602569482022 @default.
• W2060256948 countsByYear W20602569482023 @default.
• W2060256948 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2060256948 hasAuthorship W2060256948A5015026861 @default.
• W2060256948 hasAuthorship W2060256948A5033300988 @default.
• W2060256948 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2060256948 hasConcept C119857082 @default.
• W2060256948 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2060256948 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2060256948 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W2060256948 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2060256948 hasConcept C158154518 @default.
• W2060256948 hasConcept C162853370 @default.
• W2060256948 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2060256948 hasConcept C180198813 @default.
• W2060256948 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2060256948 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2060256948 hasConcept C2776620684 @default.
• W2060256948 hasConcept C2776967331 @default.
• W2060256948 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W2060256948 hasConcept C2779530757 @default.
• W2060256948 hasConcept C2780224610 @default.

• next