FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2060712076> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2060712076 endingPage "331" @default.
• W2060712076 startingPage "313" @default.
• W2060712076 abstract "Background: Current measures used to determine sentence recognition abilities in cochlear implant recipients often include tests with one talker and one rate of speech. Performance with these measures may not accurately represent the speech recognition abilities of the listeners. Evaluation of cochlear implant performance should include measures that reflect realistic listening conditions. For example, the use of multiple talkers who vary in gender, rate of speech, and regional dialects represent varied communication interactions that people encounter daily. The TIMIT sentences, which use multiple talkers and incorporate these variations, provide additional test material for evaluating speech recognition. Dorman and colleagues created 34 lists of TIMIT sentences that were normalized for equal intelligibility using simulations of cochlear implant processing with normal-hearing listeners. Adults with sensorineural hearing loss who listen with cochlear implants represent a different population. Further study is needed to determine if these lists are equivalent for adult cochlear implant recipients and, if not, to identify a subset of lists that may be used with this population. Purpose: To evaluate the speech recognition equivalence of 34 TIMIT sentence lists with adult cochlear implant recipients. Research Design: A prospective study comparing test-retest results within the same group of listeners. Study Sample: Twenty-two adult cochlear implant recipients who met the inclusion criteria of at least 3 mo device use and a monosyllabic word score of 30% or greater participated in the study. Data Collection and Analysis: Participants were administered 34 TIMIT sentence lists (20 sentences per list) at each of two test sessions several months apart. List order was randomized and results scored as percent of words correct. Test-retest correlations and 95% confidence intervals for the means were used to identify equivalent lists with high test-retest reliability. Results: Mean list scores across participants ranged from 66 to 81% with an overall mean of 73%. Twenty-nine lists had high test-retest reliability. Using the overall mean as a benchmark, the 95% confidence intervals indicated that 25 of the remaining 29 lists were equivalent (e.g., the benchmark of 73% fell within the 95% confidence interval for both test and retest). Conclusions: Twenty-five of the TIMIT lists evaluated are equivalent when used with adult cochlear implant recipients who have open-set word recognition abilities. These lists may prove valuable for monitoring progress, comparing listening conditions or treatments, and developing aural rehabilitation plans for cochlear implant recipients." @default.
• W2060712076 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2060712076 creator A5020347604 @default.
• W2060712076 creator A5031898476 @default.
• W2060712076 creator A5032048742 @default.
• W2060712076 creator A5034675384 @default.
• W2060712076 creator A5037403159 @default.
• W2060712076 date "2012-05-01" @default.
• W2060712076 modified "2023-09-22" @default.
• W2060712076 title "Evaluation of TIMIT Sentence List Equivalency with Adult Cochlear Implant Recipients" @default.
• W2060712076 cites W1970540073 @default.
• W2060712076 cites W1970794461 @default.
• W2060712076 cites W1971432264 @default.
• W2060712076 cites W1975675577 @default.
• W2060712076 cites W1978540017 @default.
• W2060712076 cites W1982711384 @default.
• W2060712076 cites W1986976118 @default.
• W2060712076 cites W1987210018 @default.
• W2060712076 cites W1989203528 @default.
• W2060712076 cites W1989392497 @default.
• W2060712076 cites W1994230319 @default.
• W2060712076 cites W1994657361 @default.
• W2060712076 cites W1995896474 @default.
• W2060712076 cites W1997371353 @default.
• W2060712076 cites W1999299164 @default.
• W2060712076 cites W2014089856 @default.
• W2060712076 cites W2015028281 @default.
• W2060712076 cites W2015335876 @default.
• W2060712076 cites W2021193063 @default.
• W2060712076 cites W2023969516 @default.
• W2060712076 cites W2026813732 @default.
• W2060712076 cites W2035794805 @default.
• W2060712076 cites W2041354419 @default.
• W2060712076 cites W2045506283 @default.
• W2060712076 cites W2058527656 @default.
• W2060712076 cites W2059338466 @default.
• W2060712076 cites W2064514227 @default.
• W2060712076 cites W2072870781 @default.
• W2060712076 cites W2074305255 @default.
• W2060712076 cites W2076389330 @default.
• W2060712076 cites W2078417517 @default.
• W2060712076 cites W2082632177 @default.
• W2060712076 cites W2083557216 @default.
• W2060712076 cites W2086282453 @default.
• W2060712076 cites W2092252434 @default.
• W2060712076 cites W2094230316 @default.
• W2060712076 cites W2095439836 @default.
• W2060712076 cites W2114555589 @default.
• W2060712076 cites W2115378439 @default.
• W2060712076 cites W2132369843 @default.
• W2060712076 cites W2138457628 @default.
• W2060712076 cites W2165920944 @default.
• W2060712076 cites W2319513141 @default.
• W2060712076 cites W2414748756 @default.
• W2060712076 cites W2778915404 @default.
• W2060712076 cites W2902605581 @default.
• W2060712076 cites W2910001684 @default.
• W2060712076 cites W2984203146 @default.
• W2060712076 cites W36608386 @default.
• W2060712076 cites W574645793 @default.
• W2060712076 cites W638006253 @default.
• W2060712076 doi "https://doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.23.5.3" @default.
• W2060712076 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/3428733" @default.
• W2060712076 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22533975" @default.
• W2060712076 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W2060712076 type Work @default.
• W2060712076 sameAs 2060712076 @default.
• W2060712076 citedByCount "15" @default.
• W2060712076 countsByYear W20607120762014 @default.
• W2060712076 countsByYear W20607120762015 @default.
• W2060712076 countsByYear W20607120762016 @default.
• W2060712076 countsByYear W20607120762017 @default.
• W2060712076 countsByYear W20607120762018 @default.
• W2060712076 countsByYear W20607120762019 @default.
• W2060712076 countsByYear W20607120762020 @default.
• W2060712076 countsByYear W20607120762021 @default.
• W2060712076 countsByYear W20607120762022 @default.
• W2060712076 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2060712076 hasAuthorship W2060712076A5020347604 @default.
• W2060712076 hasAuthorship W2060712076A5031898476 @default.
• W2060712076 hasAuthorship W2060712076A5032048742 @default.
• W2060712076 hasAuthorship W2060712076A5034675384 @default.
• W2060712076 hasAuthorship W2060712076A5037403159 @default.
• W2060712076 hasBestOaLocation W20607120762 @default.
• W2060712076 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2060712076 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W2060712076 hasConcept C177291462 @default.
• W2060712076 hasConcept C204321447 @default.
• W2060712076 hasConcept C23224414 @default.
• W2060712076 hasConcept C26760741 @default.
• W2060712076 hasConcept C2777530160 @default.
• W2060712076 hasConcept C2778724510 @default.
• W2060712076 hasConcept C2778882171 @default.
• W2060712076 hasConcept C28490314 @default.
• W2060712076 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2060712076 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2060712076 hasConcept C46312422 @default.
• W2060712076 hasConcept C548259974 @default.

• next