FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2060984983> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2060984983 endingPage "815" @default.
• W2060984983 startingPage "809" @default.
• W2060984983 abstract "ObjectiveIn this study we aim to assess the cost-effectiveness analysis of minimally invasive vein harvesting. The great saphenous vein is the most commonly used conduit in coronary artery bypass surgery. In the past decade minimally invasive techniques have been developed to reduce the surgical trauma associated with the conventional open vein-harvesting technique. There is strong evidence to suggest that minimally invasive harvesting can reduce postoperative wound healing complications, pain, mobility restriction, and hospital stay. Despite the increasingly widespread use of this technique, formal cost-effectiveness analysis has never been performed.MethodsEconomic analysis was performed according to the National Institute of Healthcare and Clinical Excellence guidelines on the evaluation of technology by using published data on postoperative pain and mobility restriction, locally collected data, National Health Service reference costs, and manufacturer's data. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed to investigate and quantify the uncertainty associated with the results of our analysis.ResultsThe results of our analysis demonstrate that minimally invasive vein harvesting was more cost-effective, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $19,858.87/quality-adjusted life year (QALY), comparing favorably with other health care interventions. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis demonstrated with 95.6% certainty that endoscopic harvesting was more cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000/quality-adjusted life year. Alternative analysis suggested that even with considerable uncertainty associated with quality of life after vein harvesting, minimally invasive harvesting was more cost-effective than conventional vein harvesting.ConclusionMinimally invasive harvesting is the most cost-effective method of harvesting the great saphenous vein and can significantly improve a patient's quality of life. In this study we aim to assess the cost-effectiveness analysis of minimally invasive vein harvesting. The great saphenous vein is the most commonly used conduit in coronary artery bypass surgery. In the past decade minimally invasive techniques have been developed to reduce the surgical trauma associated with the conventional open vein-harvesting technique. There is strong evidence to suggest that minimally invasive harvesting can reduce postoperative wound healing complications, pain, mobility restriction, and hospital stay. Despite the increasingly widespread use of this technique, formal cost-effectiveness analysis has never been performed. Economic analysis was performed according to the National Institute of Healthcare and Clinical Excellence guidelines on the evaluation of technology by using published data on postoperative pain and mobility restriction, locally collected data, National Health Service reference costs, and manufacturer's data. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis was performed to investigate and quantify the uncertainty associated with the results of our analysis. The results of our analysis demonstrate that minimally invasive vein harvesting was more cost-effective, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $19,858.87/quality-adjusted life year (QALY), comparing favorably with other health care interventions. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis demonstrated with 95.6% certainty that endoscopic harvesting was more cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000/quality-adjusted life year. Alternative analysis suggested that even with considerable uncertainty associated with quality of life after vein harvesting, minimally invasive harvesting was more cost-effective than conventional vein harvesting. Minimally invasive harvesting is the most cost-effective method of harvesting the great saphenous vein and can significantly improve a patient's quality of life." @default.
• W2060984983 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2060984983 creator A5019188914 @default.
• W2060984983 creator A5029047220 @default.
• W2060984983 creator A5044513022 @default.
• W2060984983 creator A5044623008 @default.
• W2060984983 creator A5055352669 @default.
• W2060984983 creator A5055785355 @default.
• W2060984983 creator A5057852698 @default.
• W2060984983 creator A5067609068 @default.
• W2060984983 creator A5069948788 @default.
• W2060984983 creator A5090617894 @default.
• W2060984983 date "2008-04-01" @default.
• W2060984983 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2060984983 title "Is minimally invasive harvesting of the great saphenous vein for coronary artery bypass surgery a cost-effective technique?" @default.
• W2060984983 cites W1972979890 @default.
• W2060984983 cites W1973539234 @default.
• W2060984983 cites W1983025015 @default.
• W2060984983 cites W1986908227 @default.
• W2060984983 cites W1998687607 @default.
• W2060984983 cites W2018940071 @default.
• W2060984983 cites W2019030191 @default.
• W2060984983 cites W2023906413 @default.
• W2060984983 cites W2032245068 @default.
• W2060984983 cites W2043756695 @default.
• W2060984983 cites W2054485155 @default.
• W2060984983 cites W2059486942 @default.
• W2060984983 cites W2065879102 @default.
• W2060984983 cites W2067391679 @default.
• W2060984983 cites W2096303535 @default.
• W2060984983 cites W2144020464 @default.
• W2060984983 cites W2147429735 @default.
• W2060984983 cites W2162707966 @default.
• W2060984983 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.09.042" @default.
• W2060984983 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18374760" @default.
• W2060984983 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
• W2060984983 type Work @default.
• W2060984983 sameAs 2060984983 @default.
• W2060984983 citedByCount "32" @default.
• W2060984983 countsByYear W20609849832012 @default.
• W2060984983 countsByYear W20609849832013 @default.
• W2060984983 countsByYear W20609849832014 @default.
• W2060984983 countsByYear W20609849832015 @default.
• W2060984983 countsByYear W20609849832016 @default.
• W2060984983 countsByYear W20609849832017 @default.
• W2060984983 countsByYear W20609849832018 @default.
• W2060984983 countsByYear W20609849832019 @default.
• W2060984983 countsByYear W20609849832020 @default.
• W2060984983 countsByYear W20609849832021 @default.
• W2060984983 countsByYear W20609849832022 @default.
• W2060984983 countsByYear W20609849832023 @default.
• W2060984983 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2060984983 hasAuthorship W2060984983A5019188914 @default.
• W2060984983 hasAuthorship W2060984983A5029047220 @default.
• W2060984983 hasAuthorship W2060984983A5044513022 @default.
• W2060984983 hasAuthorship W2060984983A5044623008 @default.
• W2060984983 hasAuthorship W2060984983A5055352669 @default.
• W2060984983 hasAuthorship W2060984983A5055785355 @default.
• W2060984983 hasAuthorship W2060984983A5057852698 @default.
• W2060984983 hasAuthorship W2060984983A5067609068 @default.
• W2060984983 hasAuthorship W2060984983A5069948788 @default.
• W2060984983 hasAuthorship W2060984983A5090617894 @default.
• W2060984983 hasBestOaLocation W20609849831 @default.
• W2060984983 hasConcept C112930515 @default.
• W2060984983 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2060984983 hasConcept C2777202286 @default.
• W2060984983 hasConcept C2779480337 @default.
• W2060984983 hasConcept C3019080777 @default.
• W2060984983 hasConcept C515549039 @default.
• W2060984983 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2060984983 hasConceptScore W2060984983C112930515 @default.
• W2060984983 hasConceptScore W2060984983C141071460 @default.
• W2060984983 hasConceptScore W2060984983C2777202286 @default.
• W2060984983 hasConceptScore W2060984983C2779480337 @default.
• W2060984983 hasConceptScore W2060984983C3019080777 @default.
• W2060984983 hasConceptScore W2060984983C515549039 @default.
• W2060984983 hasConceptScore W2060984983C71924100 @default.
• W2060984983 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2060984983 hasLocation W20609849831 @default.
• W2060984983 hasLocation W20609849832 @default.
• W2060984983 hasOpenAccess W2060984983 @default.
• W2060984983 hasPrimaryLocation W20609849831 @default.
• W2060984983 hasRelatedWork W1607917430 @default.
• W2060984983 hasRelatedWork W2040298148 @default.
• W2060984983 hasRelatedWork W2051693828 @default.
• W2060984983 hasRelatedWork W2063524432 @default.
• W2060984983 hasRelatedWork W2068543473 @default.
• W2060984983 hasRelatedWork W2370945871 @default.
• W2060984983 hasRelatedWork W2372299581 @default.
• W2060984983 hasRelatedWork W2392377786 @default.
• W2060984983 hasRelatedWork W2413090889 @default.
• W2060984983 hasRelatedWork W899595869 @default.
• W2060984983 hasVolume "135" @default.
• W2060984983 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2060984983 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2060984983 magId "2060984983" @default.
• W2060984983 workType "article" @default.