FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2061036312> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2061036312 endingPage "e90" @default.
• W2061036312 startingPage "e83" @default.
• W2061036312 abstract "PurposeTo test whether multicriteria optimization (MCO) can reduce treatment planning time and improve plan quality in intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).Methods and MaterialsTen IMRT patients (5 with glioblastoma and 5 with locally advanced pancreatic cancers) were logged during the standard treatment planning procedure currently in use at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH). Planning durations and other relevant planning information were recorded. In parallel, the patients were planned using an MCO planning system, and similar planning time data were collected. The patients were treated with the standard plan, but each MCO plan was also approved by the physicians. Plans were then blindly reviewed 3 weeks after planning by the treating physician.ResultsIn all cases, the treatment planning time was vastly shorter for the MCO planning (average MCO treatment planning time was 12 min; average standard planning time was 135 min). The physician involvement time in the planning process increased from an average of 4.8 min for the standard process to 8.6 min for the MCO process. In all cases, the MCO plan was blindly identified as the superior plan.ConclusionsThis provides the first concrete evidence that MCO-based planning is superior in terms of both planning efficiency and dose distribution quality compared with the current trial and error–based IMRT planning approach. To test whether multicriteria optimization (MCO) can reduce treatment planning time and improve plan quality in intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Ten IMRT patients (5 with glioblastoma and 5 with locally advanced pancreatic cancers) were logged during the standard treatment planning procedure currently in use at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH). Planning durations and other relevant planning information were recorded. In parallel, the patients were planned using an MCO planning system, and similar planning time data were collected. The patients were treated with the standard plan, but each MCO plan was also approved by the physicians. Plans were then blindly reviewed 3 weeks after planning by the treating physician. In all cases, the treatment planning time was vastly shorter for the MCO planning (average MCO treatment planning time was 12 min; average standard planning time was 135 min). The physician involvement time in the planning process increased from an average of 4.8 min for the standard process to 8.6 min for the MCO process. In all cases, the MCO plan was blindly identified as the superior plan. This provides the first concrete evidence that MCO-based planning is superior in terms of both planning efficiency and dose distribution quality compared with the current trial and error–based IMRT planning approach." @default.
• W2061036312 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2061036312 creator A5000777470 @default.
• W2061036312 creator A5044225007 @default.
• W2061036312 creator A5045425111 @default.
• W2061036312 creator A5085676104 @default.
• W2061036312 date "2012-01-01" @default.
• W2061036312 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2061036312 title "Improved Planning Time and Plan Quality Through Multicriteria Optimization for Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy" @default.
• W2061036312 cites W1965842941 @default.
• W2061036312 cites W1980956836 @default.
• W2061036312 cites W1982315191 @default.
• W2061036312 cites W1992394555 @default.
• W2061036312 cites W2025651318 @default.
• W2061036312 cites W2035629892 @default.
• W2061036312 cites W2068943445 @default.
• W2061036312 cites W2101689005 @default.
• W2061036312 cites W2116622921 @default.
• W2061036312 cites W2127539856 @default.
• W2061036312 cites W2129827706 @default.
• W2061036312 cites W2149552113 @default.
• W2061036312 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.12.007" @default.
• W2061036312 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/3202037" @default.
• W2061036312 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21300448" @default.
• W2061036312 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W2061036312 type Work @default.
• W2061036312 sameAs 2061036312 @default.
• W2061036312 citedByCount "165" @default.
• W2061036312 countsByYear W20610363122012 @default.
• W2061036312 countsByYear W20610363122013 @default.
• W2061036312 countsByYear W20610363122014 @default.
• W2061036312 countsByYear W20610363122015 @default.
• W2061036312 countsByYear W20610363122016 @default.
• W2061036312 countsByYear W20610363122017 @default.
• W2061036312 countsByYear W20610363122018 @default.
• W2061036312 countsByYear W20610363122019 @default.
• W2061036312 countsByYear W20610363122020 @default.
• W2061036312 countsByYear W20610363122021 @default.
• W2061036312 countsByYear W20610363122022 @default.
• W2061036312 countsByYear W20610363122023 @default.
• W2061036312 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2061036312 hasAuthorship W2061036312A5000777470 @default.
• W2061036312 hasAuthorship W2061036312A5044225007 @default.
• W2061036312 hasAuthorship W2061036312A5045425111 @default.
• W2061036312 hasAuthorship W2061036312A5085676104 @default.
• W2061036312 hasBestOaLocation W20610363121 @default.
• W2061036312 hasConcept C106436119 @default.
• W2061036312 hasConcept C12148698 @default.
• W2061036312 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2061036312 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2061036312 hasConcept C166957645 @default.
• W2061036312 hasConcept C19527891 @default.
• W2061036312 hasConcept C201645570 @default.
• W2061036312 hasConcept C2776505523 @default.
• W2061036312 hasConcept C2776746162 @default.
• W2061036312 hasConcept C2778618615 @default.
• W2061036312 hasConcept C509974204 @default.
• W2061036312 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2061036312 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W2061036312 hasConceptScore W2061036312C106436119 @default.
• W2061036312 hasConceptScore W2061036312C12148698 @default.
• W2061036312 hasConceptScore W2061036312C141071460 @default.
• W2061036312 hasConceptScore W2061036312C142724271 @default.
• W2061036312 hasConceptScore W2061036312C166957645 @default.
• W2061036312 hasConceptScore W2061036312C19527891 @default.
• W2061036312 hasConceptScore W2061036312C201645570 @default.
• W2061036312 hasConceptScore W2061036312C2776505523 @default.
• W2061036312 hasConceptScore W2061036312C2776746162 @default.
• W2061036312 hasConceptScore W2061036312C2778618615 @default.
• W2061036312 hasConceptScore W2061036312C509974204 @default.
• W2061036312 hasConceptScore W2061036312C71924100 @default.
• W2061036312 hasConceptScore W2061036312C95457728 @default.
• W2061036312 hasIssue "1" @default.
• W2061036312 hasLocation W20610363121 @default.
• W2061036312 hasLocation W20610363122 @default.
• W2061036312 hasLocation W20610363123 @default.
• W2061036312 hasLocation W20610363124 @default.
• W2061036312 hasOpenAccess W2061036312 @default.
• W2061036312 hasPrimaryLocation W20610363121 @default.
• W2061036312 hasRelatedWork W2003305474 @default.
• W2061036312 hasRelatedWork W2016256026 @default.
• W2061036312 hasRelatedWork W2041795146 @default.
• W2061036312 hasRelatedWork W2124788963 @default.
• W2061036312 hasRelatedWork W2135461415 @default.
• W2061036312 hasRelatedWork W2356632721 @default.
• W2061036312 hasRelatedWork W2465517649 @default.
• W2061036312 hasRelatedWork W2810562364 @default.
• W2061036312 hasRelatedWork W4252376856 @default.
• W2061036312 hasRelatedWork W903827780 @default.
• W2061036312 hasVolume "82" @default.
• W2061036312 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2061036312 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2061036312 magId "2061036312" @default.
• W2061036312 workType "article" @default.