FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2061556564> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2061556564 abstract "Empirical-ethical research constitutes a relatively new field which integrates socio-empirical research and normative analysis. As direct inferences from descriptive data to normative conclusions are problematic, an ethical framework is needed to determine the relevance of the empirical data for normative argument. While issues of normative-empirical collaboration and questions of empirical methodology have been widely discussed in the literature, the normative methodology of empirical-ethical research has seldom been addressed. Based on our own research experience, we discuss one aspect of this normative methodology, namely the selection of an ethical theory serving as a background for empirical-ethical research. Whereas criteria for a good ethical theory in philosophical ethics are usually related to inherent aspects, such as the theory’s clarity or coherence, additional points have to be considered in the field of empirical-ethical research. Three of these additional criteria will be discussed in the article: (a) the adequacy of the ethical theory for the issue at stake, (b) the theory’s suitability for the purposes and design of the empirical-ethical research project, and (c) the interrelation between the ethical theory selected and the theoretical backgrounds of the socio-empirical research. Using the example of our own study on the development of interventions which support clinical decision-making in oncology, we will show how the selection of an ethical theory as a normative background for empirical-ethical research can proceed. We will also discuss the limitations of the procedures chosen in our project. The article stresses that a systematic and reasoned approach towards theory selection in empirical-ethical research should be given priority rather than an accidental or implicit way of choosing the normative framework for one’s own research. It furthermore shows that the overall design of an empirical-ethical study is a multi-faceted endeavor which has to balance between theoretical and pragmatic considerations." @default.
• W2061556564 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2061556564 creator A5021513080 @default.
• W2061556564 creator A5040627544 @default.
• W2061556564 creator A5042834551 @default.
• W2061556564 creator A5071098924 @default.
• W2061556564 date "2015-04-04" @default.
• W2061556564 modified "2023-10-07" @default.
• W2061556564 title "The normative background of empirical-ethical research: first steps towards a transparent and reasoned approach in the selection of an ethical theory" @default.
• W2061556564 cites W1554214692 @default.
• W2061556564 cites W1843482055 @default.
• W2061556564 cites W1913790713 @default.
• W2061556564 cites W1973268756 @default.
• W2061556564 cites W1979617127 @default.
• W2061556564 cites W1993903656 @default.
• W2061556564 cites W1995958285 @default.
• W2061556564 cites W2006385974 @default.
• W2061556564 cites W2030921362 @default.
• W2061556564 cites W2035340164 @default.
• W2061556564 cites W2042419340 @default.
• W2061556564 cites W2060413620 @default.
• W2061556564 cites W2080514752 @default.
• W2061556564 cites W2089750499 @default.
• W2061556564 cites W2091341970 @default.
• W2061556564 cites W2095125870 @default.
• W2061556564 cites W2119709966 @default.
• W2061556564 cites W2123112819 @default.
• W2061556564 cites W2125369282 @default.
• W2061556564 cites W2126381016 @default.
• W2061556564 cites W2130193436 @default.
• W2061556564 cites W2139127931 @default.
• W2061556564 cites W2155442412 @default.
• W2061556564 cites W2158390477 @default.
• W2061556564 cites W2159156009 @default.
• W2061556564 cites W40150837 @default.
• W2061556564 cites W4210621994 @default.
• W2061556564 cites W4240707855 @default.
• W2061556564 cites W4253856055 @default.
• W2061556564 doi "https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-015-0016-x" @default.
• W2061556564 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/4404235" @default.
• W2061556564 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25889221" @default.
• W2061556564 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2061556564 type Work @default.
• W2061556564 sameAs 2061556564 @default.
• W2061556564 citedByCount "20" @default.
• W2061556564 countsByYear W20615565642015 @default.
• W2061556564 countsByYear W20615565642016 @default.
• W2061556564 countsByYear W20615565642017 @default.
• W2061556564 countsByYear W20615565642018 @default.
• W2061556564 countsByYear W20615565642019 @default.
• W2061556564 countsByYear W20615565642020 @default.
• W2061556564 countsByYear W20615565642021 @default.
• W2061556564 countsByYear W20615565642022 @default.
• W2061556564 countsByYear W20615565642023 @default.
• W2061556564 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2061556564 hasAuthorship W2061556564A5021513080 @default.
• W2061556564 hasAuthorship W2061556564A5040627544 @default.
• W2061556564 hasAuthorship W2061556564A5042834551 @default.
• W2061556564 hasAuthorship W2061556564A5071098924 @default.
• W2061556564 hasBestOaLocation W20615565641 @default.
• W2061556564 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2061556564 hasConcept C120936955 @default.
• W2061556564 hasConcept C121242521 @default.
• W2061556564 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2061556564 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2061556564 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2061556564 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2061556564 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2061556564 hasConcept C162324750 @default.
• W2061556564 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2061556564 hasConcept C19891933 @default.
• W2061556564 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W2061556564 hasConcept C2777146004 @default.
• W2061556564 hasConcept C2994432249 @default.
• W2061556564 hasConcept C44725695 @default.
• W2061556564 hasConcept C539667460 @default.
• W2061556564 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
• W2061556564 hasConcept C55587333 @default.
• W2061556564 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2061556564 hasConcept C98184364 @default.
• W2061556564 hasConceptScore W2061556564C111472728 @default.
• W2061556564 hasConceptScore W2061556564C120936955 @default.
• W2061556564 hasConceptScore W2061556564C121242521 @default.
• W2061556564 hasConceptScore W2061556564C126322002 @default.
• W2061556564 hasConceptScore W2061556564C127413603 @default.
• W2061556564 hasConceptScore W2061556564C138885662 @default.
• W2061556564 hasConceptScore W2061556564C142724271 @default.
• W2061556564 hasConceptScore W2061556564C15744967 @default.
• W2061556564 hasConceptScore W2061556564C162324750 @default.
• W2061556564 hasConceptScore W2061556564C185592680 @default.
• W2061556564 hasConceptScore W2061556564C19891933 @default.
• W2061556564 hasConceptScore W2061556564C204787440 @default.
• W2061556564 hasConceptScore W2061556564C2777146004 @default.
• W2061556564 hasConceptScore W2061556564C2994432249 @default.
• W2061556564 hasConceptScore W2061556564C44725695 @default.
• W2061556564 hasConceptScore W2061556564C539667460 @default.
• W2061556564 hasConceptScore W2061556564C55493867 @default.
• W2061556564 hasConceptScore W2061556564C55587333 @default.
• W2061556564 hasConceptScore W2061556564C71924100 @default.
• W2061556564 hasConceptScore W2061556564C98184364 @default.

• next