FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2061618897> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2061618897 endingPage "1594" @default.
• W2061618897 startingPage "1579" @default.
• W2061618897 abstract "Abstract We present a scheme and application example for evaluating simulations of possible future conditions of regional climate (‘regional climate change scenarios’) concerning their suitability for hydrological impact studies. The procedure is based on expert knowledge about the impacts of anthropogenic climate change on varying hydrological processes and different hydrological catchment status. A method to evaluate regional climate change scenarios for hydrological impact analysis is presented first, which consists basically of a two‐step knowledge‐based decision and evaluation procedure. The first step (‘climatic evaluation’) evaluates the capability of the climate scenarios to represent regional climate and the plausibility of the future climate conditions. The first step establishes the basis for the second step (‘hydrological evaluation’), which evaluates hydrologically relevant information of the climate scenarios to qualify information about the hydrological processes possibly altered by climate change. From this evaluation of the hydrological processes, an evaluation of regional catchment conditions is derived, such as long‐term water availability, drought conditions or floods. In the second part of the paper, this method is applied systematically to three different regional climate change scenarios, which have been provided for south Germany. This evaluation results in different levels of adequacy, depending on the hydrological process under question. In general, processes which are governed by temperature conditions (e.g. evaporation, snowmelt) are evaluated as ‘more useful’ than the processes governed by precipitation characteristics (e.g. runoff generation, floods). All regional climate change scenario methods investigated are of rather limited value for extreme hydrological conditions. The proposed method can serve to systematically evaluate the usefulness of climate change scenarios for hydrological impact analysis. It becomes apparent that regional climate scenarios should only be applied for hydrological application if the spatial‐temporal scale of variations of the governing hydrological processes is represented by the scenarios. Copyright © 2007 Royal Meteorological Society" @default.
• W2061618897 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2061618897 creator A5021672270 @default.
• W2061618897 creator A5023110471 @default.
• W2061618897 creator A5063110262 @default.
• W2061618897 creator A5066829486 @default.
• W2061618897 date "2007-09-27" @default.
• W2061618897 modified "2023-10-01" @default.
• W2061618897 title "Comparison and evaluation of regional climate scenarios for hydrological impact analysis: General scheme and application example" @default.
• W2061618897 cites W1532233165 @default.
• W2061618897 cites W1968251786 @default.
• W2061618897 cites W1971980246 @default.
• W2061618897 cites W1973186291 @default.
• W2061618897 cites W1981495918 @default.
• W2061618897 cites W2001039352 @default.
• W2061618897 cites W2002520835 @default.
• W2061618897 cites W2004328558 @default.
• W2061618897 cites W2010345411 @default.
• W2061618897 cites W2013961998 @default.
• W2061618897 cites W2015509665 @default.
• W2061618897 cites W2026156015 @default.
• W2061618897 cites W2029448356 @default.
• W2061618897 cites W2062046279 @default.
• W2061618897 cites W2062608572 @default.
• W2061618897 cites W2066691418 @default.
• W2061618897 cites W2071126503 @default.
• W2061618897 cites W2075979407 @default.
• W2061618897 cites W2089155192 @default.
• W2061618897 cites W2089513747 @default.
• W2061618897 cites W2090007187 @default.
• W2061618897 cites W2093141926 @default.
• W2061618897 cites W2094794852 @default.
• W2061618897 cites W2097040965 @default.
• W2061618897 cites W2101077148 @default.
• W2061618897 cites W2103809536 @default.
• W2061618897 cites W2107609036 @default.
• W2061618897 cites W2122974524 @default.
• W2061618897 cites W2136224231 @default.
• W2061618897 cites W2139481095 @default.
• W2061618897 cites W2146166109 @default.
• W2061618897 cites W2148467862 @default.
• W2061618897 cites W2165921862 @default.
• W2061618897 cites W4237872437 @default.
• W2061618897 doi "https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1621" @default.
• W2061618897 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
• W2061618897 type Work @default.
• W2061618897 sameAs 2061618897 @default.
• W2061618897 citedByCount "64" @default.
• W2061618897 countsByYear W20616188972012 @default.
• W2061618897 countsByYear W20616188972013 @default.
• W2061618897 countsByYear W20616188972014 @default.
• W2061618897 countsByYear W20616188972015 @default.
• W2061618897 countsByYear W20616188972016 @default.
• W2061618897 countsByYear W20616188972017 @default.
• W2061618897 countsByYear W20616188972018 @default.
• W2061618897 countsByYear W20616188972019 @default.
• W2061618897 countsByYear W20616188972020 @default.
• W2061618897 countsByYear W20616188972021 @default.
• W2061618897 countsByYear W20616188972022 @default.
• W2061618897 countsByYear W20616188972023 @default.
• W2061618897 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2061618897 hasAuthorship W2061618897A5021672270 @default.
• W2061618897 hasAuthorship W2061618897A5023110471 @default.
• W2061618897 hasAuthorship W2061618897A5063110262 @default.
• W2061618897 hasAuthorship W2061618897A5066829486 @default.
• W2061618897 hasConcept C107054158 @default.
• W2061618897 hasConcept C111368507 @default.
• W2061618897 hasConcept C126645576 @default.
• W2061618897 hasConcept C127313418 @default.
• W2061618897 hasConcept C132651083 @default.
• W2061618897 hasConcept C153294291 @default.
• W2061618897 hasConcept C153823671 @default.
• W2061618897 hasConcept C168754636 @default.
• W2061618897 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W2061618897 hasConcept C197046000 @default.
• W2061618897 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W2061618897 hasConcept C39432304 @default.
• W2061618897 hasConcept C41156917 @default.
• W2061618897 hasConcept C49204034 @default.
• W2061618897 hasConcept C50477045 @default.
• W2061618897 hasConcept C58640448 @default.
• W2061618897 hasConcept C64649846 @default.
• W2061618897 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2061618897 hasConceptScore W2061618897C107054158 @default.
• W2061618897 hasConceptScore W2061618897C111368507 @default.
• W2061618897 hasConceptScore W2061618897C126645576 @default.
• W2061618897 hasConceptScore W2061618897C127313418 @default.
• W2061618897 hasConceptScore W2061618897C132651083 @default.
• W2061618897 hasConceptScore W2061618897C153294291 @default.
• W2061618897 hasConceptScore W2061618897C153823671 @default.
• W2061618897 hasConceptScore W2061618897C168754636 @default.
• W2061618897 hasConceptScore W2061618897C18903297 @default.
• W2061618897 hasConceptScore W2061618897C197046000 @default.
• W2061618897 hasConceptScore W2061618897C205649164 @default.
• W2061618897 hasConceptScore W2061618897C39432304 @default.
• W2061618897 hasConceptScore W2061618897C41156917 @default.
• W2061618897 hasConceptScore W2061618897C49204034 @default.
• W2061618897 hasConceptScore W2061618897C50477045 @default.

• next