FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2061738585> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2061738585 endingPage "e32692" @default.
• W2061738585 startingPage "e32692" @default.
• W2061738585 abstract "Background As the United States embraces electronic health records (EHRs), improved emergency medical services (EMS) information systems are also a priority; however, little is known about the experiences of EMS agencies as they adopt and implement electronic patient care report (e-PCR) systems. We sought to characterize motivations for adoption of e-PCR systems, challenges associated with adoption and implementation, and emerging implementation strategies. Methods We conducted a qualitative study using semi-structured in-depth interviews with EMS agency leaders. Participants were recruited through a web-based survey of National Association of EMS Physicians (NAEMSP) members, a didactic session at the 2010 NAEMSP Annual Meeting, and snowball sampling. Interviews lasted approximately 30 minutes, were recorded and professionally transcribed. Analysis was conducted by a five-person team, employing the constant comparative method to identify recurrent themes. Results Twenty-three interviewees represented 20 EMS agencies from the United States and Canada; 14 EMS agencies were currently using e-PCR systems. The primary reason for adoption was the potential for e-PCR systems to support quality assurance efforts. Challenges to e-PCR system adoption included those common to any health information technology project, as well as challenges unique to the prehospital setting, including: fear of increased ambulance run times leading to decreased ambulance availability, difficulty integrating with existing hospital information systems, and unfunded mandates requiring adoption of e-PCR systems. Three recurring strategies emerged to improve e-PCR system adoption and implementation: 1) identify creative funding sources; 2) leverage regional health information organizations; and 3) build internal information technology capacity. Conclusion EMS agencies are highly motivated to adopt e-PCR systems to support quality assurance efforts; however, adoption and implementation of e-PCR systems has been challenging for many. Emerging strategies from EMS agencies and others that have successfully implemented EHRs may be useful in expanding e-PCR system use and facilitating this transition for other EMS agencies." @default.
• W2061738585 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2061738585 creator A5002790663 @default.
• W2061738585 creator A5005547439 @default.
• W2061738585 creator A5013315373 @default.
• W2061738585 creator A5045842376 @default.
• W2061738585 creator A5056706353 @default.
• W2061738585 date "2012-03-05" @default.
• W2061738585 modified "2023-10-03" @default.
• W2061738585 title "Prehospital Electronic Patient Care Report Systems: Early Experiences from Emergency Medical Services Agency Leaders" @default.
• W2061738585 cites W1560239704 @default.
• W2061738585 cites W1575867849 @default.
• W2061738585 cites W1987614881 @default.
• W2061738585 cites W2005519248 @default.
• W2061738585 cites W2007636297 @default.
• W2061738585 cites W2028993630 @default.
• W2061738585 cites W2050190410 @default.
• W2061738585 cites W2067287940 @default.
• W2061738585 cites W2075109167 @default.
• W2061738585 cites W2081210368 @default.
• W2061738585 cites W2092071994 @default.
• W2061738585 cites W2101994403 @default.
• W2061738585 cites W2102059582 @default.
• W2061738585 cites W2103440005 @default.
• W2061738585 cites W2104176655 @default.
• W2061738585 cites W2104667268 @default.
• W2061738585 cites W2104799039 @default.
• W2061738585 cites W2132667528 @default.
• W2061738585 cites W2149639497 @default.
• W2061738585 cites W2149673794 @default.
• W2061738585 cites W2155857546 @default.
• W2061738585 cites W4247002863 @default.
• W2061738585 cites W4295133420 @default.
• W2061738585 doi "https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0032692" @default.
• W2061738585 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/3293855" @default.
• W2061738585 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22403698" @default.
• W2061738585 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W2061738585 type Work @default.
• W2061738585 sameAs 2061738585 @default.
• W2061738585 citedByCount "28" @default.
• W2061738585 countsByYear W20617385852012 @default.
• W2061738585 countsByYear W20617385852013 @default.
• W2061738585 countsByYear W20617385852014 @default.
• W2061738585 countsByYear W20617385852015 @default.
• W2061738585 countsByYear W20617385852016 @default.
• W2061738585 countsByYear W20617385852017 @default.
• W2061738585 countsByYear W20617385852019 @default.
• W2061738585 countsByYear W20617385852020 @default.
• W2061738585 countsByYear W20617385852021 @default.
• W2061738585 countsByYear W20617385852022 @default.
• W2061738585 countsByYear W20617385852023 @default.
• W2061738585 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2061738585 hasAuthorship W2061738585A5002790663 @default.
• W2061738585 hasAuthorship W2061738585A5005547439 @default.
• W2061738585 hasAuthorship W2061738585A5013315373 @default.
• W2061738585 hasAuthorship W2061738585A5045842376 @default.
• W2061738585 hasAuthorship W2061738585A5056706353 @default.
• W2061738585 hasBestOaLocation W20617385851 @default.
• W2061738585 hasConcept C106399304 @default.
• W2061738585 hasConcept C108170787 @default.
• W2061738585 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
• W2061738585 hasConcept C119599485 @default.
• W2061738585 hasConcept C119857082 @default.
• W2061738585 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2061738585 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2061738585 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2061738585 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2061738585 hasConcept C153083717 @default.
• W2061738585 hasConcept C159110408 @default.
• W2061738585 hasConcept C160735492 @default.
• W2061738585 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
• W2061738585 hasConcept C180198813 @default.
• W2061738585 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
• W2061738585 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2061738585 hasConcept C545288138 @default.
• W2061738585 hasConcept C545542383 @default.
• W2061738585 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2061738585 hasConceptScore W2061738585C106399304 @default.
• W2061738585 hasConceptScore W2061738585C108170787 @default.
• W2061738585 hasConceptScore W2061738585C111472728 @default.
• W2061738585 hasConceptScore W2061738585C119599485 @default.
• W2061738585 hasConceptScore W2061738585C119857082 @default.
• W2061738585 hasConceptScore W2061738585C127413603 @default.
• W2061738585 hasConceptScore W2061738585C138885662 @default.
• W2061738585 hasConceptScore W2061738585C142724271 @default.
• W2061738585 hasConceptScore W2061738585C144133560 @default.
• W2061738585 hasConceptScore W2061738585C153083717 @default.
• W2061738585 hasConceptScore W2061738585C159110408 @default.
• W2061738585 hasConceptScore W2061738585C160735492 @default.
• W2061738585 hasConceptScore W2061738585C17744445 @default.
• W2061738585 hasConceptScore W2061738585C180198813 @default.
• W2061738585 hasConceptScore W2061738585C199539241 @default.
• W2061738585 hasConceptScore W2061738585C41008148 @default.
• W2061738585 hasConceptScore W2061738585C545288138 @default.
• W2061738585 hasConceptScore W2061738585C545542383 @default.
• W2061738585 hasConceptScore W2061738585C71924100 @default.
• W2061738585 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2061738585 hasLocation W20617385851 @default.

• next