FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2062052610> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2062052610 endingPage "999" @default.
• W2062052610 startingPage "999" @default.
• W2062052610 abstract "Health status in patients with coexistent COPD and heart failure: a validation and comparison between the Clinical COPD Questionnaire and the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire Farida F Berkhof,1 Leola Metzemaekers,1 Steven M Uil,1 Huib AM Kerstjens,2 Jan WK van den Berg11Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Isala Hospital, Zwolle, 2Department of Pulmonary Diseases, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen Research Institute for Asthma and COPD, Groningen, the NetherlandsBackground: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and heart failure (HF) are both common diseases that coexist frequently. Patients with both diseases have worse stable state health status when compared with patients with one of these diseases. In many outpatient clinics, health status is monitored routinely in COPD patients using the Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) and in HF patients with the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHF-Q). This study validated and compared which questionnaire, ie, the CCQ or the MLHF-Q, is suited best for patients with coexistent COPD and HF.Methods: Patients with both COPD and HF and aged ≥40 years were included. Construct validity, internal consistency, test–retest reliability, and agreement were determined. The Short-Form 36 was used as the external criterion. All questionnaires were completed at baseline. The CCQ and MLHF-Q were repeated after 2 weeks, together with a global rating of change.Results: Fifty-eight patients were included, of whom 50 completed the study. Construct validity was acceptable. Internal consistency was adequate for CCQ and MLHF-Q total and domain scores, with a Cronbach&#39;s alpha ≥0.70. Reliability was adequate for MLHF-Q and CCQ total and domain scores, and intraclass correlation coefficients were 0.70–0.90, except for the CCQ symptom score (intraclass correlation coefficient 0.42). The standard error of measurement on the group level was smaller than the minimal clinical important difference for both questionnaires. However, the standard error of measurement on the individual level was larger than the minimal clinical important difference. Agreement was acceptable on the group level and limited on the individual level.Conclusion: CCQ and MLHF-Q were both valid and reliable questionnaires for assessment of health status in patients with coexistent COPD and HF on the group level, and hence for research. However, in clinical practice, on the individual level, the characteristics of both questionnaires were not as good. There is room for a questionnaire with good evaluative properties on the individual level, preferably tested in a setting of patients with COPD or HF, or both.Keywords: Clinical COPD Questionnaire, Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, heart failure" @default.
• W2062052610 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2062052610 creator A5013428765 @default.
• W2062052610 creator A5037380838 @default.
• W2062052610 creator A5057481287 @default.
• W2062052610 creator A5076309891 @default.
• W2062052610 creator A5088610395 @default.
• W2062052610 date "2014-09-01" @default.
• W2062052610 modified "2023-09-30" @default.
• W2062052610 title "Health status in patients with coexistent COPD and heart failure: a validation and comparison between the Clinical COPD Questionnaire and the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire" @default.
• W2062052610 cites W1531557766 @default.
• W2062052610 cites W1998207473 @default.
• W2062052610 cites W2014744551 @default.
• W2062052610 cites W2019398887 @default.
• W2062052610 cites W2023650850 @default.
• W2062052610 cites W2025700192 @default.
• W2062052610 cites W2037377025 @default.
• W2062052610 cites W2041324093 @default.
• W2062052610 cites W2056434149 @default.
• W2062052610 cites W2064840169 @default.
• W2062052610 cites W2068642280 @default.
• W2062052610 cites W2072813786 @default.
• W2062052610 cites W2092970695 @default.
• W2062052610 cites W2102471539 @default.
• W2062052610 cites W2115988342 @default.
• W2062052610 cites W2117766903 @default.
• W2062052610 cites W2124403378 @default.
• W2062052610 cites W2125661215 @default.
• W2062052610 cites W2127689215 @default.
• W2062052610 cites W2127951128 @default.
• W2062052610 cites W2130746864 @default.
• W2062052610 cites W2139991409 @default.
• W2062052610 cites W2143765657 @default.
• W2062052610 cites W2146437656 @default.
• W2062052610 cites W2149849734 @default.
• W2062052610 cites W2159759971 @default.
• W2062052610 cites W2160477976 @default.
• W2062052610 cites W2165340553 @default.
• W2062052610 cites W2167115187 @default.
• W2062052610 cites W2167544636 @default.
• W2062052610 cites W2171762906 @default.
• W2062052610 cites W2313984032 @default.
• W2062052610 cites W2614242365 @default.
• W2062052610 cites W2682583422 @default.
• W2062052610 doi "https://doi.org/10.2147/copd.s66028" @default.
• W2062052610 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/4181441" @default.
• W2062052610 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25285000" @default.
• W2062052610 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W2062052610 type Work @default.
• W2062052610 sameAs 2062052610 @default.
• W2062052610 citedByCount "6" @default.
• W2062052610 countsByYear W20620526102015 @default.
• W2062052610 countsByYear W20620526102016 @default.
• W2062052610 countsByYear W20620526102017 @default.
• W2062052610 countsByYear W20620526102020 @default.
• W2062052610 countsByYear W20620526102021 @default.
• W2062052610 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2062052610 hasAuthorship W2062052610A5013428765 @default.
• W2062052610 hasAuthorship W2062052610A5037380838 @default.
• W2062052610 hasAuthorship W2062052610A5057481287 @default.
• W2062052610 hasAuthorship W2062052610A5076309891 @default.
• W2062052610 hasAuthorship W2062052610A5088610395 @default.
• W2062052610 hasBestOaLocation W20620526101 @default.
• W2062052610 hasConcept C106906290 @default.
• W2062052610 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2062052610 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2062052610 hasConcept C171606756 @default.
• W2062052610 hasConcept C1862650 @default.
• W2062052610 hasConcept C2775944032 @default.
• W2062052610 hasConcept C2776042228 @default.
• W2062052610 hasConcept C2776780178 @default.
• W2062052610 hasConcept C2778198053 @default.
• W2062052610 hasConcept C3020110884 @default.
• W2062052610 hasConcept C49453240 @default.
• W2062052610 hasConcept C70410870 @default.
• W2062052610 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2062052610 hasConceptScore W2062052610C106906290 @default.
• W2062052610 hasConceptScore W2062052610C126322002 @default.
• W2062052610 hasConceptScore W2062052610C141071460 @default.
• W2062052610 hasConceptScore W2062052610C171606756 @default.
• W2062052610 hasConceptScore W2062052610C1862650 @default.
• W2062052610 hasConceptScore W2062052610C2775944032 @default.
• W2062052610 hasConceptScore W2062052610C2776042228 @default.
• W2062052610 hasConceptScore W2062052610C2776780178 @default.
• W2062052610 hasConceptScore W2062052610C2778198053 @default.
• W2062052610 hasConceptScore W2062052610C3020110884 @default.
• W2062052610 hasConceptScore W2062052610C49453240 @default.
• W2062052610 hasConceptScore W2062052610C70410870 @default.
• W2062052610 hasConceptScore W2062052610C71924100 @default.
• W2062052610 hasLocation W20620526101 @default.
• W2062052610 hasLocation W20620526102 @default.
• W2062052610 hasLocation W20620526103 @default.
• W2062052610 hasLocation W20620526104 @default.
• W2062052610 hasLocation W20620526105 @default.
• W2062052610 hasOpenAccess W2062052610 @default.
• W2062052610 hasPrimaryLocation W20620526101 @default.
• W2062052610 hasRelatedWork W2062052610 @default.
• W2062052610 hasRelatedWork W2070352318 @default.

• next