FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2062255532> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2062255532 abstract "Abstract: Classical detection thresholds do not predict liking, as they focus on the presence or absence of a sensation. Recently however, Prescott and colleagues described a new method, the rejection threshold, where a series of forced choice preference tasks are used to generate a dose‐response function to determine hedonically acceptable concentrations. That is, how much is too much? To date, this approach has been used exclusively in liquid foods. Here, we determined group rejection thresholds in solid chocolate‐flavored compound coating for bitterness. The influences of self‐identified preferences for milk or dark chocolate, as well as eating style (chewers compared to melters) on rejection thresholds were investigated. Stimuli included milk chocolate‐flavored compound coating spiked with increasing amounts of sucrose octaacetate, a bitter and generally recognized as safe additive. Paired preference tests (blank compared to spike) were used to determine the proportion of the group that preferred the blank. Across pairs, spiked samples were presented in ascending concentration. We were able to quantify and compare differences between 2 self‐identified market segments. The rejection threshold for the dark chocolate preferring group was significantly higher than the milk chocolate preferring group ( P = 0.01). Conversely, eating style did not affect group rejection thresholds ( P = 0.14), although this may reflect the amount of chocolate given to participants. Additionally, there was no association between chocolate preference and eating style ( P = 0.36). Present work supports the contention that this method can be used to examine preferences within specific market segments and potentially individual differences as they relate to ingestive behavior. Practical Application: This work makes use of the rejection threshold method to study market segmentation, extending its use to solid foods. We believe this method has broad applicability to the sensory specialist and product developer by providing a process to identify how much is too much when formulating products, even in the context of specific market segments. We illustrate this in solid chocolate‐flavored compound coating, identifying substantial differences in the amount of acceptable bitterness in those who prefer milk chocolate compared to dark chocolate. This method provides a direct means to answer the question of how much is too much." @default.
• W2062255532 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2062255532 creator A5010293913 @default.
• W2062255532 creator A5065064930 @default.
• W2062255532 creator A5066981456 @default.
• W2062255532 date "2012-08-27" @default.
• W2062255532 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2062255532 title "Rejection Thresholds in Solid Chocolate-Flavored Compound Coating" @default.
• W2062255532 cites W1906675343 @default.
• W2062255532 cites W1976567460 @default.
• W2062255532 cites W1979152360 @default.
• W2062255532 cites W2001492990 @default.
• W2062255532 cites W2053478238 @default.
• W2062255532 cites W2064148653 @default.
• W2062255532 cites W2067371796 @default.
• W2062255532 cites W2078156195 @default.
• W2062255532 cites W2093636726 @default.
• W2062255532 cites W2160207748 @default.
• W2062255532 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-3841.2012.02889.x" @default.
• W2062255532 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/3472037" @default.
• W2062255532 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22924788" @default.
• W2062255532 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
• W2062255532 type Work @default.
• W2062255532 sameAs 2062255532 @default.
• W2062255532 citedByCount "19" @default.
• W2062255532 countsByYear W20622555322013 @default.
• W2062255532 countsByYear W20622555322014 @default.
• W2062255532 countsByYear W20622555322015 @default.
• W2062255532 countsByYear W20622555322016 @default.
• W2062255532 countsByYear W20622555322017 @default.
• W2062255532 countsByYear W20622555322018 @default.
• W2062255532 countsByYear W20622555322019 @default.
• W2062255532 countsByYear W20622555322020 @default.
• W2062255532 countsByYear W20622555322023 @default.
• W2062255532 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2062255532 hasAuthorship W2062255532A5010293913 @default.
• W2062255532 hasAuthorship W2062255532A5065064930 @default.
• W2062255532 hasAuthorship W2062255532A5066981456 @default.
• W2062255532 hasBestOaLocation W20622555321 @default.
• W2062255532 hasConcept C105795698 @default.
• W2062255532 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2062255532 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2062255532 hasConcept C2778316324 @default.
• W2062255532 hasConcept C2781249084 @default.
• W2062255532 hasConcept C2910013192 @default.
• W2062255532 hasConcept C2911065790 @default.
• W2062255532 hasConcept C31903555 @default.
• W2062255532 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2062255532 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
• W2062255532 hasConceptScore W2062255532C105795698 @default.
• W2062255532 hasConceptScore W2062255532C15744967 @default.
• W2062255532 hasConceptScore W2062255532C185592680 @default.
• W2062255532 hasConceptScore W2062255532C2778316324 @default.
• W2062255532 hasConceptScore W2062255532C2781249084 @default.
• W2062255532 hasConceptScore W2062255532C2910013192 @default.
• W2062255532 hasConceptScore W2062255532C2911065790 @default.
• W2062255532 hasConceptScore W2062255532C31903555 @default.
• W2062255532 hasConceptScore W2062255532C33923547 @default.
• W2062255532 hasConceptScore W2062255532C77805123 @default.
• W2062255532 hasIssue "10" @default.
• W2062255532 hasLocation W20622555321 @default.
• W2062255532 hasLocation W20622555322 @default.
• W2062255532 hasLocation W20622555323 @default.
• W2062255532 hasLocation W20622555324 @default.
• W2062255532 hasOpenAccess W2062255532 @default.
• W2062255532 hasPrimaryLocation W20622555321 @default.
• W2062255532 hasRelatedWork W104943979 @default.
• W2062255532 hasRelatedWork W1675370448 @default.
• W2062255532 hasRelatedWork W1974683216 @default.
• W2062255532 hasRelatedWork W2618512796 @default.
• W2062255532 hasRelatedWork W2897748907 @default.
• W2062255532 hasRelatedWork W2901443657 @default.
• W2062255532 hasRelatedWork W3009940165 @default.
• W2062255532 hasRelatedWork W2346979857 @default.
• W2062255532 hasRelatedWork W2473101423 @default.
• W2062255532 hasRelatedWork W3082055245 @default.
• W2062255532 hasVolume "77" @default.
• W2062255532 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2062255532 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2062255532 magId "2062255532" @default.
• W2062255532 workType "article" @default.