Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2063357360> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 76 of
76
with 100 items per page.
- W2063357360 endingPage "S81" @default.
- W2063357360 startingPage "S76" @default.
- W2063357360 abstract "Purpose: To perform a dosimetric comparison of a minimal 3-mm leaf width multileaf collimator (MLC) and a minimal 5-mm MLC in dynamic conformal arc stereotactic radiosurgery for treatment of intracranial lesions. Methods and Materials: The treatment plans of 23 patients previously treated for intracranial lesions in our institution were redone using the BrainSCAN, version 5.3, stereotactic radiosurgery treatment planning system (BrainLAB). For each case, two dynamic conformal arc plans were generated: one using a minimal 3-mm micro-MLC (BrainLAB, Novalis) and one using a minimal 5-mm MLC (Varian Millennium). All arc parameters were the same in each of the two plans, except for the collimator angle settings. The collimator angle settings were optimized for each arc in each plan. A peritumoral rind structure (1 cm) was created to evaluate normal tissue sparing immediately adjacent to the target volume. Conformity indexes (CIs) were calculated for each plan. The dependence of normal tissue sparing and target conformity on target volume (TV) was determined. Results: The TV was 0.14–36.32 cm 3 (median, 5.90). The CI was 1.22–2.60 (median, 1.51) for the 3-mm micro-MLC and 1.23–2.69 (median, 1.60) for the 5-mm MLC. Despite this small difference, it was a statistically significant increase ( p 50 ), 80% (PRV 80 ), and 90% (PRV 90 ) of the prescription dose. The reduction in the PRV 50 , PRV 80 , and PRV 90 for the 3-mm micro-MLC compared with the 5-mm MLC was 13.5%, 12.9%, and 11.5%, respectively. The CI decreased with a larger TV, as did the difference in the CIs between the 3-mm micro-MLC and 5-mm MLC. A reduction in the PRV increased with larger TVs. Conclusion: The 3-mm micro-MLC provided better target conformity and greater normal tissue sparing than the 5-mm MLC in stereotactic radiosurgery using dynamic conformal arcs. These differences were small but consistent in the patients examined. Future research is needed to determine whether this small improvement can yield a clinical impact on patient care." @default.
- W2063357360 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2063357360 creator A5012096941 @default.
- W2063357360 creator A5035423539 @default.
- W2063357360 creator A5064814064 @default.
- W2063357360 creator A5080895084 @default.
- W2063357360 date "2006-11-01" @default.
- W2063357360 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
- W2063357360 title "Is smaller better? Comparison of 3-mm and 5-mm leaf size for stereotactic radiosurgery: A dosimetric study" @default.
- W2063357360 cites W1966522026 @default.
- W2063357360 cites W1987246334 @default.
- W2063357360 cites W1993951726 @default.
- W2063357360 cites W1995822876 @default.
- W2063357360 cites W2000471589 @default.
- W2063357360 cites W2008355295 @default.
- W2063357360 cites W2027835608 @default.
- W2063357360 cites W2035109934 @default.
- W2063357360 cites W2049225956 @default.
- W2063357360 cites W2058718908 @default.
- W2063357360 cites W2074042544 @default.
- W2063357360 cites W2074794504 @default.
- W2063357360 cites W2148023536 @default.
- W2063357360 cites W2183101157 @default.
- W2063357360 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.04.061" @default.
- W2063357360 hasPublicationYear "2006" @default.
- W2063357360 type Work @default.
- W2063357360 sameAs 2063357360 @default.
- W2063357360 citedByCount "23" @default.
- W2063357360 countsByYear W20633573602012 @default.
- W2063357360 countsByYear W20633573602013 @default.
- W2063357360 countsByYear W20633573602014 @default.
- W2063357360 countsByYear W20633573602015 @default.
- W2063357360 countsByYear W20633573602017 @default.
- W2063357360 countsByYear W20633573602018 @default.
- W2063357360 countsByYear W20633573602019 @default.
- W2063357360 countsByYear W20633573602020 @default.
- W2063357360 countsByYear W20633573602021 @default.
- W2063357360 countsByYear W20633573602022 @default.
- W2063357360 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2063357360 hasAuthorship W2063357360A5012096941 @default.
- W2063357360 hasAuthorship W2063357360A5035423539 @default.
- W2063357360 hasAuthorship W2063357360A5064814064 @default.
- W2063357360 hasAuthorship W2063357360A5080895084 @default.
- W2063357360 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
- W2063357360 hasConcept C19527891 @default.
- W2063357360 hasConcept C2780387249 @default.
- W2063357360 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
- W2063357360 hasConcept C509974204 @default.
- W2063357360 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2063357360 hasConceptScore W2063357360C126838900 @default.
- W2063357360 hasConceptScore W2063357360C19527891 @default.
- W2063357360 hasConceptScore W2063357360C2780387249 @default.
- W2063357360 hasConceptScore W2063357360C2989005 @default.
- W2063357360 hasConceptScore W2063357360C509974204 @default.
- W2063357360 hasConceptScore W2063357360C71924100 @default.
- W2063357360 hasIssue "4" @default.
- W2063357360 hasLocation W20633573601 @default.
- W2063357360 hasOpenAccess W2063357360 @default.
- W2063357360 hasPrimaryLocation W20633573601 @default.
- W2063357360 hasRelatedWork W1985895619 @default.
- W2063357360 hasRelatedWork W2008447202 @default.
- W2063357360 hasRelatedWork W2018856919 @default.
- W2063357360 hasRelatedWork W2045026794 @default.
- W2063357360 hasRelatedWork W2132730716 @default.
- W2063357360 hasRelatedWork W2342601826 @default.
- W2063357360 hasRelatedWork W2467653772 @default.
- W2063357360 hasRelatedWork W3197881107 @default.
- W2063357360 hasRelatedWork W3210245320 @default.
- W2063357360 hasRelatedWork W367827289 @default.
- W2063357360 hasVolume "66" @default.
- W2063357360 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2063357360 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2063357360 magId "2063357360" @default.
- W2063357360 workType "article" @default.