FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2063662026> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2063662026 endingPage "287" @default.
• W2063662026 startingPage "265" @default.
• W2063662026 abstract "Improvements to the decision-making process in the areas of preventive maintenance and facility repairs for a range of infrastructure include maintenance, upgrading and retrofitting operations. Depending on the available information concerning the condition of the facilities, specific types of projects can be programmed. Assigning a priority of action to a given project necessitates an evaluation process that introduces several criteria at various functional levels. This multi criteria (MC) evaluation is modelled as the aggregation of partial scores attributed to a project with regards to (w.r.t.) a given set of criteria. The scores are expressed over a finite scale which can cause some troubles when no attention is paid to the aggregation procedure. This paper deals with the consistency of the evaluation process, where scores are expressed as labels by experts (over finite discrete scales), whereas the aggregation model is supposed to deal with numerical values and cardinal scales. This is a curious but common apparent paradox in MC evaluation when engineering contexts are concerned. Adequate mathematical tools are provided to tackle the related problems. A robustness analysis of the evaluation process concludes the mathematical part of the paper. The mathematical choices regarding our information processing chain meet the ESCOTA motorway company requirements. Indeed, ESCOTA aims at the formalization and improvement of the decisional process for preventive maintenance of its assets in a MC framework. According to available pieces of knowledge on the infrastructure condition, projects are to be evaluated w.r.t. technical but also to conformity, security and financial criteria for planning purposes. ESCOTA’s engineers are used to manipulate symbolic labels but might convert them into more or less arbitrary numerical values when necessary without the necessary care. The SINERGIE decision support system has been developed for ESCOTA to implement a logically sound information processing methodology. The SINERGIE man–machine interfaces illustrate the way by which the mathematical concepts described in this paper are used in terms of infrastructure management activities. The various information processing phases laid out in SINERGIE have been illustrated for road applications." @default.
• W2063662026 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2063662026 creator A5019212344 @default.
• W2063662026 creator A5053040799 @default.
• W2063662026 creator A5090151644 @default.
• W2063662026 date "2009-07-01" @default.
• W2063662026 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
• W2063662026 title "Multi criteria analyses for managing motorway company facilities: The decision support system SINERGIE" @default.
• W2063662026 cites W1965980034 @default.
• W2063662026 cites W1978234686 @default.
• W2063662026 cites W1984047803 @default.
• W2063662026 cites W1988104153 @default.
• W2063662026 cites W2017149666 @default.
• W2063662026 cites W2030004954 @default.
• W2063662026 cites W2044575796 @default.
• W2063662026 cites W2045022216 @default.
• W2063662026 cites W2048288497 @default.
• W2063662026 cites W2049992776 @default.
• W2063662026 cites W2050274678 @default.
• W2063662026 cites W2054771640 @default.
• W2063662026 cites W2062859087 @default.
• W2063662026 cites W2071078065 @default.
• W2063662026 cites W2079124237 @default.
• W2063662026 cites W2081270264 @default.
• W2063662026 cites W2081652640 @default.
• W2063662026 cites W2089996365 @default.
• W2063662026 cites W2102498645 @default.
• W2063662026 cites W2117735779 @default.
• W2063662026 cites W2131462176 @default.
• W2063662026 cites W2157019099 @default.
• W2063662026 cites W2402389838 @default.
• W2063662026 cites W25243919 @default.
• W2063662026 cites W2803210264 @default.
• W2063662026 cites W4233898239 @default.
• W2063662026 cites W4241360733 @default.
• W2063662026 cites W4245055364 @default.
• W2063662026 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2008.12.001" @default.
• W2063662026 hasPublicationYear "2009" @default.
• W2063662026 type Work @default.
• W2063662026 sameAs 2063662026 @default.
• W2063662026 citedByCount "7" @default.
• W2063662026 countsByYear W20636620262012 @default.
• W2063662026 countsByYear W20636620262014 @default.
• W2063662026 countsByYear W20636620262015 @default.
• W2063662026 countsByYear W20636620262016 @default.
• W2063662026 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2063662026 hasAuthorship W2063662026A5019212344 @default.
• W2063662026 hasAuthorship W2063662026A5053040799 @default.
• W2063662026 hasAuthorship W2063662026A5090151644 @default.
• W2063662026 hasBestOaLocation W20636620262 @default.
• W2063662026 hasConcept C104317684 @default.
• W2063662026 hasConcept C111919701 @default.
• W2063662026 hasConcept C112930515 @default.
• W2063662026 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2063662026 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2063662026 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
• W2063662026 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
• W2063662026 hasConcept C177264268 @default.
• W2063662026 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2063662026 hasConcept C199360897 @default.
• W2063662026 hasConcept C200601418 @default.
• W2063662026 hasConcept C2776436953 @default.
• W2063662026 hasConcept C2778755073 @default.
• W2063662026 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2063662026 hasConcept C42475967 @default.
• W2063662026 hasConcept C55493867 @default.
• W2063662026 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W2063662026 hasConcept C63479239 @default.
• W2063662026 hasConcept C77019957 @default.
• W2063662026 hasConcept C98045186 @default.
• W2063662026 hasConceptScore W2063662026C104317684 @default.
• W2063662026 hasConceptScore W2063662026C111919701 @default.
• W2063662026 hasConceptScore W2063662026C112930515 @default.
• W2063662026 hasConceptScore W2063662026C121332964 @default.
• W2063662026 hasConceptScore W2063662026C127413603 @default.
• W2063662026 hasConceptScore W2063662026C144133560 @default.
• W2063662026 hasConceptScore W2063662026C154945302 @default.
• W2063662026 hasConceptScore W2063662026C177264268 @default.
• W2063662026 hasConceptScore W2063662026C185592680 @default.
• W2063662026 hasConceptScore W2063662026C199360897 @default.
• W2063662026 hasConceptScore W2063662026C200601418 @default.
• W2063662026 hasConceptScore W2063662026C2776436953 @default.
• W2063662026 hasConceptScore W2063662026C2778755073 @default.
• W2063662026 hasConceptScore W2063662026C41008148 @default.
• W2063662026 hasConceptScore W2063662026C42475967 @default.
• W2063662026 hasConceptScore W2063662026C55493867 @default.
• W2063662026 hasConceptScore W2063662026C62520636 @default.
• W2063662026 hasConceptScore W2063662026C63479239 @default.
• W2063662026 hasConceptScore W2063662026C77019957 @default.
• W2063662026 hasConceptScore W2063662026C98045186 @default.
• W2063662026 hasIssue "3" @default.
• W2063662026 hasLocation W20636620261 @default.
• W2063662026 hasLocation W20636620262 @default.
• W2063662026 hasLocation W20636620263 @default.
• W2063662026 hasLocation W20636620264 @default.
• W2063662026 hasLocation W20636620265 @default.
• W2063662026 hasOpenAccess W2063662026 @default.
• W2063662026 hasPrimaryLocation W20636620261 @default.

• next