FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2063794955> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2063794955 endingPage "672" @default.
• W2063794955 startingPage "665" @default.
• W2063794955 abstract "Background Adequate bowel preparation is important for optimal colonoscopy. It is important to identify patients at risk for inadequate bowel preparation because this allows taking precautions in this specific group. Objective To develop a prediction score to identify patients at risk for inadequate bowel preparation who may benefit from an intensified bowel cleansing regimen. Design Patient and colonoscopy data were prospectively collected, whereas clinical data were retrospectively collected for a total of 1996 colonoscopies in participants who received split-dose bowel preparation. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted in a random two-thirds of the cohort to develop a prediction model. Validation and evaluation of the discriminative power of the prediction model were performed within the remaining one-third of the cohort. Setting Four centers, including one academic and three medium-to-large size nonacademic centers. Patients Consecutive colonoscopies in November and December 2012. Mean age was 57.3 ± 15.9 years, 45.8% were male and indications for colonoscopy were screening and/or surveillance (27%), abdominal symptoms and/or blood loss and/or anemia (60%), inflammatory bowel disease (9%), and others (4%). Interventions Colonoscopy. Main Outcome Measurements Inadequate bowel preparation defined as Boston Bowel Preparation Scale score <6. Results A total of 1331 colonoscopies were included in the development cohort, of which 172 (12.9%) had an inadequate bowel preparation. Independent factors included in the prediction model were American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System score ≥3, use of tricyclic antidepressants, use of opioids, diabetes, chronic constipation, history of abdominal and/or pelvic surgery, history of inadequate bowel preparation, and current hospitalization. The discriminative ability of the scale was good, with an area under the curve of 0.77 in the validation cohort. Limitations Study design partially retrospective, no data on patient compliance. Conclusion We developed a validated, easy-to-use prediction scale that can be used to identify subjects with an increased risk of inadequate bowel preparation with good accuracy. Adequate bowel preparation is important for optimal colonoscopy. It is important to identify patients at risk for inadequate bowel preparation because this allows taking precautions in this specific group. To develop a prediction score to identify patients at risk for inadequate bowel preparation who may benefit from an intensified bowel cleansing regimen. Patient and colonoscopy data were prospectively collected, whereas clinical data were retrospectively collected for a total of 1996 colonoscopies in participants who received split-dose bowel preparation. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were conducted in a random two-thirds of the cohort to develop a prediction model. Validation and evaluation of the discriminative power of the prediction model were performed within the remaining one-third of the cohort. Four centers, including one academic and three medium-to-large size nonacademic centers. Consecutive colonoscopies in November and December 2012. Mean age was 57.3 ± 15.9 years, 45.8% were male and indications for colonoscopy were screening and/or surveillance (27%), abdominal symptoms and/or blood loss and/or anemia (60%), inflammatory bowel disease (9%), and others (4%). Colonoscopy. Inadequate bowel preparation defined as Boston Bowel Preparation Scale score <6. A total of 1331 colonoscopies were included in the development cohort, of which 172 (12.9%) had an inadequate bowel preparation. Independent factors included in the prediction model were American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification System score ≥3, use of tricyclic antidepressants, use of opioids, diabetes, chronic constipation, history of abdominal and/or pelvic surgery, history of inadequate bowel preparation, and current hospitalization. The discriminative ability of the scale was good, with an area under the curve of 0.77 in the validation cohort. Study design partially retrospective, no data on patient compliance. We developed a validated, easy-to-use prediction scale that can be used to identify subjects with an increased risk of inadequate bowel preparation with good accuracy." @default.
• W2063794955 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2063794955 creator A5011562139 @default.
• W2063794955 creator A5013415442 @default.
• W2063794955 creator A5019073550 @default.
• W2063794955 creator A5024013894 @default.
• W2063794955 creator A5025572750 @default.
• W2063794955 creator A5029611159 @default.
• W2063794955 creator A5035867558 @default.
• W2063794955 creator A5040475060 @default.
• W2063794955 creator A5041857317 @default.
• W2063794955 creator A5042564143 @default.
• W2063794955 creator A5046037065 @default.
• W2063794955 creator A5051182160 @default.
• W2063794955 creator A5071897671 @default.
• W2063794955 creator A5074268246 @default.
• W2063794955 creator A5075294378 @default.
• W2063794955 creator A5080885701 @default.
• W2063794955 creator A5081503066 @default.
• W2063794955 creator A5086559595 @default.
• W2063794955 date "2015-03-01" @default.
• W2063794955 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2063794955 title "Predicting inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy in participants receiving split-dose bowel preparation: development and validation of a prediction score" @default.
• W2063794955 cites W1903416172 @default.
• W2063794955 cites W1986249325 @default.
• W2063794955 cites W1993618177 @default.
• W2063794955 cites W1994351904 @default.
• W2063794955 cites W2006645803 @default.
• W2063794955 cites W2007216121 @default.
• W2063794955 cites W2008874309 @default.
• W2063794955 cites W2020623607 @default.
• W2063794955 cites W2030614879 @default.
• W2063794955 cites W2040626441 @default.
• W2063794955 cites W2048326268 @default.
• W2063794955 cites W2060051758 @default.
• W2063794955 cites W2068934043 @default.
• W2063794955 cites W2073750202 @default.
• W2063794955 cites W2074561904 @default.
• W2063794955 cites W2090862970 @default.
• W2063794955 cites W2123845707 @default.
• W2063794955 cites W2138134327 @default.
• W2063794955 cites W2144038913 @default.
• W2063794955 cites W2144826810 @default.
• W2063794955 cites W2162405193 @default.
• W2063794955 cites W2165188436 @default.
• W2063794955 cites W2325670325 @default.
• W2063794955 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2014.09.066" @default.
• W2063794955 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25600879" @default.
• W2063794955 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2063794955 type Work @default.
• W2063794955 sameAs 2063794955 @default.
• W2063794955 citedByCount "101" @default.
• W2063794955 countsByYear W20637949552015 @default.
• W2063794955 countsByYear W20637949552016 @default.
• W2063794955 countsByYear W20637949552017 @default.
• W2063794955 countsByYear W20637949552018 @default.
• W2063794955 countsByYear W20637949552019 @default.
• W2063794955 countsByYear W20637949552020 @default.
• W2063794955 countsByYear W20637949552021 @default.
• W2063794955 countsByYear W20637949552022 @default.
• W2063794955 countsByYear W20637949552023 @default.
• W2063794955 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2063794955 hasAuthorship W2063794955A5011562139 @default.
• W2063794955 hasAuthorship W2063794955A5013415442 @default.
• W2063794955 hasAuthorship W2063794955A5019073550 @default.
• W2063794955 hasAuthorship W2063794955A5024013894 @default.
• W2063794955 hasAuthorship W2063794955A5025572750 @default.
• W2063794955 hasAuthorship W2063794955A5029611159 @default.
• W2063794955 hasAuthorship W2063794955A5035867558 @default.
• W2063794955 hasAuthorship W2063794955A5040475060 @default.
• W2063794955 hasAuthorship W2063794955A5041857317 @default.
• W2063794955 hasAuthorship W2063794955A5042564143 @default.
• W2063794955 hasAuthorship W2063794955A5046037065 @default.
• W2063794955 hasAuthorship W2063794955A5051182160 @default.
• W2063794955 hasAuthorship W2063794955A5071897671 @default.
• W2063794955 hasAuthorship W2063794955A5074268246 @default.
• W2063794955 hasAuthorship W2063794955A5075294378 @default.
• W2063794955 hasAuthorship W2063794955A5080885701 @default.
• W2063794955 hasAuthorship W2063794955A5081503066 @default.
• W2063794955 hasAuthorship W2063794955A5086559595 @default.
• W2063794955 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2063794955 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2063794955 hasConcept C151956035 @default.
• W2063794955 hasConcept C2778435480 @default.
• W2063794955 hasConcept C2781112942 @default.
• W2063794955 hasConcept C526805850 @default.
• W2063794955 hasConcept C71527416 @default.
• W2063794955 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2063794955 hasConcept C72563966 @default.
• W2063794955 hasConceptScore W2063794955C121608353 @default.
• W2063794955 hasConceptScore W2063794955C126322002 @default.
• W2063794955 hasConceptScore W2063794955C151956035 @default.
• W2063794955 hasConceptScore W2063794955C2778435480 @default.
• W2063794955 hasConceptScore W2063794955C2781112942 @default.
• W2063794955 hasConceptScore W2063794955C526805850 @default.
• W2063794955 hasConceptScore W2063794955C71527416 @default.
• W2063794955 hasConceptScore W2063794955C71924100 @default.
• W2063794955 hasConceptScore W2063794955C72563966 @default.

• next