Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2063853677> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 93 of
93
with 100 items per page.
- W2063853677 endingPage "923" @default.
- W2063853677 startingPage "920" @default.
- W2063853677 abstract "The current recommendation for choosing an appropriate size cuff for measuring blood pressure (BP) is a bladder width to equal 40% of the upper arm circumference (UAC). However, most physicians use the older two-thirds or three-fourths upper arm length (UAL) recommendations to choose a cuff. The aim of this study was to verify the disparity in cuff size by using two-thirds UAL, three-fourths UAL, and 40% UAC criteria for cuff selection and to compare the indirectly measured BP by these criteria with directly measured radial intra-arterial BP.A prospective, cross-sectional, observational study was conducted in 65 hemodynamically stable patients, aged 5 days to 22 years. Direct BP measurements were obtained from a radial intra-arterial catheter. Indirect BP measurements were taken from the same arm as the arterial catheter with a mercury sphygmomanometer and standard-size arm cuffs. UAL and UAC of each patient were measured, and the 3 cuffs closest to two-thirds and three-fourths UAL and 40% UAC were used. For each cuff, 3 direct and 3 indirect BP measurements were taken. Student t test was used to compare mean systolic and diastolic BP for direct and indirect measurements.A total of 172 observations were recorded, including 56 by two-thirds UAL, 55 by three-fourths UAL, and 61 by 40% UAC criteria. There was no significant difference between the means of the ideal cuff size by 40% UAC criterion and the actual cuffs used from the available standard cuffs. However, because of an unavailability of the larger cuffs for UAL criteria, the actual cuffs used were significantly smaller than ideal. Comparison of direct and indirect BP measurements revealed no significant difference in systolic BP when the latter was obtained by 40% UAC criterion. However, the difference in diastolic BP was significant. With available cuffs, a significant difference in systolic as well as diastolic BP was seen with both UAL criteria.Practitioners are likely to use significantly larger arm cuffs when following the two-thirds and three-fourths UAL criteria than when following the 40% UAC criterion. Of the 3 criteria for cuff selection, systolic BP by 40% UAC criterion most accurately reflects directly measured radial arterial pressure. However, the 40% UAC cuff significantly overestimates the diastolic pressure. Using available cuffs for indirect measurements by two-thirds and three-quarters UAL criteria significantly underestimates systolic as well as diastolic BP when compared with radial intra-arterial BP." @default.
- W2063853677 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2063853677 creator A5012031913 @default.
- W2063853677 creator A5048077398 @default.
- W2063853677 creator A5062733671 @default.
- W2063853677 creator A5065447813 @default.
- W2063853677 date "2002-11-01" @default.
- W2063853677 modified "2023-10-12" @default.
- W2063853677 title "Discrepancies Between Direct and Indirect Blood Pressure Measurements Using Various Recommendations for Arm Cuff Selection" @default.
- W2063853677 cites W122201069 @default.
- W2063853677 cites W1973664478 @default.
- W2063853677 cites W1976712582 @default.
- W2063853677 cites W1977495689 @default.
- W2063853677 cites W1994545374 @default.
- W2063853677 cites W1997325826 @default.
- W2063853677 cites W2012567355 @default.
- W2063853677 cites W2033294948 @default.
- W2063853677 cites W2038940766 @default.
- W2063853677 cites W2041159304 @default.
- W2063853677 cites W2045211761 @default.
- W2063853677 cites W2051708587 @default.
- W2063853677 cites W2099799785 @default.
- W2063853677 cites W2431883924 @default.
- W2063853677 cites W3021204217 @default.
- W2063853677 cites W4205984977 @default.
- W2063853677 cites W4232029603 @default.
- W2063853677 doi "https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.110.5.920" @default.
- W2063853677 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12415030" @default.
- W2063853677 hasPublicationYear "2002" @default.
- W2063853677 type Work @default.
- W2063853677 sameAs 2063853677 @default.
- W2063853677 citedByCount "57" @default.
- W2063853677 countsByYear W20638536772012 @default.
- W2063853677 countsByYear W20638536772013 @default.
- W2063853677 countsByYear W20638536772014 @default.
- W2063853677 countsByYear W20638536772016 @default.
- W2063853677 countsByYear W20638536772017 @default.
- W2063853677 countsByYear W20638536772018 @default.
- W2063853677 countsByYear W20638536772019 @default.
- W2063853677 countsByYear W20638536772020 @default.
- W2063853677 countsByYear W20638536772021 @default.
- W2063853677 countsByYear W20638536772022 @default.
- W2063853677 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2063853677 hasAuthorship W2063853677A5012031913 @default.
- W2063853677 hasAuthorship W2063853677A5048077398 @default.
- W2063853677 hasAuthorship W2063853677A5062733671 @default.
- W2063853677 hasAuthorship W2063853677A5065447813 @default.
- W2063853677 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W2063853677 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
- W2063853677 hasConcept C164705383 @default.
- W2063853677 hasConcept C166504685 @default.
- W2063853677 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
- W2063853677 hasConcept C2780017030 @default.
- W2063853677 hasConcept C2910533495 @default.
- W2063853677 hasConcept C2910590557 @default.
- W2063853677 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
- W2063853677 hasConcept C57900726 @default.
- W2063853677 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2063853677 hasConcept C84393581 @default.
- W2063853677 hasConceptScore W2063853677C126322002 @default.
- W2063853677 hasConceptScore W2063853677C141071460 @default.
- W2063853677 hasConceptScore W2063853677C164705383 @default.
- W2063853677 hasConceptScore W2063853677C166504685 @default.
- W2063853677 hasConceptScore W2063853677C2524010 @default.
- W2063853677 hasConceptScore W2063853677C2780017030 @default.
- W2063853677 hasConceptScore W2063853677C2910533495 @default.
- W2063853677 hasConceptScore W2063853677C2910590557 @default.
- W2063853677 hasConceptScore W2063853677C33923547 @default.
- W2063853677 hasConceptScore W2063853677C57900726 @default.
- W2063853677 hasConceptScore W2063853677C71924100 @default.
- W2063853677 hasConceptScore W2063853677C84393581 @default.
- W2063853677 hasIssue "5" @default.
- W2063853677 hasLocation W20638536771 @default.
- W2063853677 hasLocation W20638536772 @default.
- W2063853677 hasOpenAccess W2063853677 @default.
- W2063853677 hasPrimaryLocation W20638536771 @default.
- W2063853677 hasRelatedWork W2029607753 @default.
- W2063853677 hasRelatedWork W2057576136 @default.
- W2063853677 hasRelatedWork W2073179141 @default.
- W2063853677 hasRelatedWork W2096398680 @default.
- W2063853677 hasRelatedWork W2100399546 @default.
- W2063853677 hasRelatedWork W2154448673 @default.
- W2063853677 hasRelatedWork W2165067857 @default.
- W2063853677 hasRelatedWork W2334829404 @default.
- W2063853677 hasRelatedWork W4253962643 @default.
- W2063853677 hasRelatedWork W4313363770 @default.
- W2063853677 hasVolume "110" @default.
- W2063853677 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2063853677 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2063853677 magId "2063853677" @default.
- W2063853677 workType "article" @default.