FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2064057029> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2064057029 endingPage "73" @default.
• W2064057029 startingPage "67" @default.
• W2064057029 abstract "From the pragmatists to the neo-Piagetians, de- velopment has been understood to involve cycles of perception and action — the internalization of interactions with the world and the construction of skills for acting in the world. From a neurobiological standpoint, new evidence suggests that neural activities related to action and perception converge in the brain in high-level sensory association and motor planning ar- eas that have been described as mirror neuron areas. However, the term mirroring can be misleading for educators and neu- roscientists alike, as it suggests a direct and largely passive in- ternal refl ection of another person ' s goals and actions into one ' s own brain. Building from my colleagues ' thoughts on my earlier study of two hemispherectomized boys ( M. H. Immordino-Yang, 2007 , pp. 66 - 83; see commentaries, this is- sue), in this response to commentaries, I suggest a model in which the internalization of another ' s goals and actions hap- pens in a culturally modulated dynamic interaction between minds and is grounded in the neuropsychological strengths and weaknesses of the learner. In this approach, learners capi- talize on their strengths and preferences to internalize and construct representations of problem domains, a process that is organized by the smoke around the mirrors — sociocultural and emotional factors. Across many perspectives from the pragmatists to the neo- Piagetians, development has been analyzed in terms of cycles of perception and action — a combination of the internaliza- tion of interactions with the world and the construction of skills for acting in the world. In A tale of two cases: Lessons for education from the study of two boys living with half their brains ( Immordino-Yang, 2007 ), I showed that Nico (miss- ing his right cerebral hemisphere) and Brooke (missing his left) had compensated for basic neuropsychological skills to previously unexpected degrees and argued that the ways they had compensated revealed general principles about the active role of the learner and the organizing role of emotion and social interaction in development. 1 In this paper, building from my original argument and from those of my colleagues in their commentaries ( Ablin, 2008; Christoff, 2008; Snow, 2008; van Geert & Steenbeek, 2008 ), I argue that the juxtapo- sition of Nico ' s and Brooke ' s performances provides a power- ful wedge into the problem of individual differences through providing an extraordinary example of the relationship between perception and action in learning. This example leads to a tentative scheme that brings together cognitive developmental theory with recent neurobiological evidence on the functioning of mirror neuron systems in the brain, to produce pedagogically relevant insights into the nature of contextualized skill development and a deeper analysis of the functioning of mirror neuron systems in learning. In the sections that follow, I extend the argument from my original paper to claim that Nico ' s and Brooke ' s patterns of skills for prosody (the affective intonation or melody of speech) can be interpreted as complementary examples of the relationship between perception and action in development. I argue that taking such an interpretation leads to a more 1" @default.
• W2064057029 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2064057029 creator A5024235323 @default.
• W2064057029 date "2008-06-01" @default.
• W2064057029 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2064057029 title "The Smoke Around Mirror Neurons: Goals as Sociocultural and Emotional Organizers of Perception and Action in Learning" @default.
• W2064057029 cites W1526915519 @default.
• W2064057029 cites W1968372229 @default.
• W2064057029 cites W1986856036 @default.
• W2064057029 cites W2016740912 @default.
• W2064057029 cites W2025290778 @default.
• W2064057029 cites W2032970213 @default.
• W2064057029 cites W2047509178 @default.
• W2064057029 cites W2054864098 @default.
• W2064057029 cites W2057149119 @default.
• W2064057029 cites W2088313145 @default.
• W2064057029 cites W2102186810 @default.
• W2064057029 cites W2111185864 @default.
• W2064057029 cites W2117500413 @default.
• W2064057029 cites W2120019338 @default.
• W2064057029 cites W2136511704 @default.
• W2064057029 cites W2145945667 @default.
• W2064057029 cites W2152300001 @default.
• W2064057029 cites W4249704931 @default.
• W2064057029 cites W4297439914 @default.
• W2064057029 cites W2113335374 @default.
• W2064057029 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-228x.2008.00034.x" @default.
• W2064057029 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
• W2064057029 type Work @default.
• W2064057029 sameAs 2064057029 @default.
• W2064057029 citedByCount "65" @default.
• W2064057029 countsByYear W20640570292012 @default.
• W2064057029 countsByYear W20640570292013 @default.
• W2064057029 countsByYear W20640570292014 @default.
• W2064057029 countsByYear W20640570292015 @default.
• W2064057029 countsByYear W20640570292016 @default.
• W2064057029 countsByYear W20640570292018 @default.
• W2064057029 countsByYear W20640570292019 @default.
• W2064057029 countsByYear W20640570292020 @default.
• W2064057029 countsByYear W20640570292021 @default.
• W2064057029 countsByYear W20640570292022 @default.
• W2064057029 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2064057029 hasAuthorship W2064057029A5024235323 @default.
• W2064057029 hasBestOaLocation W20640570291 @default.
• W2064057029 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2064057029 hasConcept C136617856 @default.
• W2064057029 hasConcept C144024400 @default.
• W2064057029 hasConcept C153294291 @default.
• W2064057029 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
• W2064057029 hasConcept C169760540 @default.
• W2064057029 hasConcept C180747234 @default.
• W2064057029 hasConcept C188147891 @default.
• W2064057029 hasConcept C19165224 @default.
• W2064057029 hasConcept C196187386 @default.
• W2064057029 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W2064057029 hasConcept C26760741 @default.
• W2064057029 hasConcept C2780791683 @default.
• W2064057029 hasConcept C58874564 @default.
• W2064057029 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W2064057029 hasConceptScore W2064057029C121332964 @default.
• W2064057029 hasConceptScore W2064057029C136617856 @default.
• W2064057029 hasConceptScore W2064057029C144024400 @default.
• W2064057029 hasConceptScore W2064057029C153294291 @default.
• W2064057029 hasConceptScore W2064057029C15744967 @default.
• W2064057029 hasConceptScore W2064057029C169760540 @default.
• W2064057029 hasConceptScore W2064057029C180747234 @default.
• W2064057029 hasConceptScore W2064057029C188147891 @default.
• W2064057029 hasConceptScore W2064057029C19165224 @default.
• W2064057029 hasConceptScore W2064057029C196187386 @default.
• W2064057029 hasConceptScore W2064057029C205649164 @default.
• W2064057029 hasConceptScore W2064057029C26760741 @default.
• W2064057029 hasConceptScore W2064057029C2780791683 @default.
• W2064057029 hasConceptScore W2064057029C58874564 @default.
• W2064057029 hasConceptScore W2064057029C62520636 @default.
• W2064057029 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2064057029 hasLocation W20640570291 @default.
• W2064057029 hasOpenAccess W2064057029 @default.
• W2064057029 hasPrimaryLocation W20640570291 @default.
• W2064057029 hasRelatedWork W1966235639 @default.
• W2064057029 hasRelatedWork W1980685406 @default.
• W2064057029 hasRelatedWork W2050225516 @default.
• W2064057029 hasRelatedWork W2110195703 @default.
• W2064057029 hasRelatedWork W2143141867 @default.
• W2064057029 hasRelatedWork W2176308325 @default.
• W2064057029 hasRelatedWork W2300032333 @default.
• W2064057029 hasRelatedWork W2325903967 @default.
• W2064057029 hasRelatedWork W2556783850 @default.
• W2064057029 hasRelatedWork W2624714767 @default.
• W2064057029 hasVolume "2" @default.
• W2064057029 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2064057029 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2064057029 magId "2064057029" @default.
• W2064057029 workType "article" @default.