Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2064073178> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 54 of
54
with 100 items per page.
- W2064073178 endingPage "572" @default.
- W2064073178 startingPage "571" @default.
- W2064073178 abstract "I commend the authors of “Friction does not increase anchorage loading” (Southard TE, Marshall SD, Grosland NM. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;131:412-4) for highlighting a basic concept of friction and anchorage. I also read the letter of Dr Halazonetis (Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2007;131:699) in response to the article. Over the years, we have read repeatedly in standard textbooks that, to slide a tooth or teeth on an archwire, the orthodontist must apply enough force to overcome friction and to cause orthodontic tooth movement. When a tooth slides along an archwire, frictional force acts between the archwire and the bracket slot. This frictional force acts in the opposite direction to the sliding motion. Take the example of retracting a maxillary canine into a first premolar extraction space by sliding mechanics. As Southard et al explained, frictional force reduces the retraction force on the canine and also the protraction force on the molar. In spite of knowing the law of friction, no one ever mentioned that frictional force at the molar tends to decrease the protraction force at that molar. I think everybody would agree with that, because it is in accordance with the laws of friction. Southard et al challenged previous concepts that everyone was following. I congratulate them, but I would like to add some additional comments. Southard concluded that effective forces against the roots of a canine and a molar (100 g) in the sliding mechanics system are the same as in a frictionless system. This concept looks fine when we see the illustrations in the article, but the actual clinical situation is different. Clinically, one cannot estimate the exact magnitude of friction, and so force is applied beyond what is necessary to overcome friction. In that case, effective forces against the root of the molar and the canine might be greater in friction mechanics than in a frictionless system. When we overestimate and apply the force to overcome friction, then that force can become optimal for the molar to move forward. Whereas in frictionless mechanics, the fabrication and activation of a loop is more precise, one also knows the forces and moment from the calibration tables and also the time to activate the loop. The authors made an excellent attempt to challenge existing knowledge and concepts that all of us were just following without questioning. The publication of such articles is not disappointing for our specialty. In fact, this type of article should be encouraged because it is thought- provoking; one feels that people are really thinking without blindly following others. The authors mentioned finite element modelling study to support their viewpoint. It will be good if that study is also published because it will throw light on the finer aspects of friction and anchorage. Authors’ responseAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial OrthopedicsVol. 132Issue 5PreviewWe appreciate Dr Sehgal’s effort in writing his letter. As he pointed out, we responded to some issues in a previous exchange in the “Letters to the editor” section. I believe we addressed Dr Sehgal’s comments, for the most part, in our reponse to Dr Halazonetis in June. However, he brought up the question of what happens if the retraction force is increased beyond that required to overcome friction. Full-Text PDF" @default.
- W2064073178 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2064073178 creator A5040327231 @default.
- W2064073178 date "2007-11-01" @default.
- W2064073178 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
- W2064073178 title "Friction and anchorage" @default.
- W2064073178 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.09.009" @default.
- W2064073178 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18005818" @default.
- W2064073178 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
- W2064073178 type Work @default.
- W2064073178 sameAs 2064073178 @default.
- W2064073178 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W2064073178 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2064073178 hasAuthorship W2064073178A5040327231 @default.
- W2064073178 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
- W2064073178 hasConcept C133769200 @default.
- W2064073178 hasConcept C192562407 @default.
- W2064073178 hasConcept C199343813 @default.
- W2064073178 hasConcept C202271784 @default.
- W2064073178 hasConcept C2780641865 @default.
- W2064073178 hasConcept C29694066 @default.
- W2064073178 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2064073178 hasConcept C78519656 @default.
- W2064073178 hasConceptScore W2064073178C127413603 @default.
- W2064073178 hasConceptScore W2064073178C133769200 @default.
- W2064073178 hasConceptScore W2064073178C192562407 @default.
- W2064073178 hasConceptScore W2064073178C199343813 @default.
- W2064073178 hasConceptScore W2064073178C202271784 @default.
- W2064073178 hasConceptScore W2064073178C2780641865 @default.
- W2064073178 hasConceptScore W2064073178C29694066 @default.
- W2064073178 hasConceptScore W2064073178C71924100 @default.
- W2064073178 hasConceptScore W2064073178C78519656 @default.
- W2064073178 hasIssue "5" @default.
- W2064073178 hasLocation W20640731781 @default.
- W2064073178 hasLocation W20640731782 @default.
- W2064073178 hasOpenAccess W2064073178 @default.
- W2064073178 hasPrimaryLocation W20640731781 @default.
- W2064073178 hasRelatedWork W1719901275 @default.
- W2064073178 hasRelatedWork W176074491 @default.
- W2064073178 hasRelatedWork W2077494877 @default.
- W2064073178 hasRelatedWork W2108182262 @default.
- W2064073178 hasRelatedWork W2374229673 @default.
- W2064073178 hasRelatedWork W2392513340 @default.
- W2064073178 hasRelatedWork W2556400088 @default.
- W2064073178 hasRelatedWork W4200409585 @default.
- W2064073178 hasRelatedWork W4229332514 @default.
- W2064073178 hasRelatedWork W4240533503 @default.
- W2064073178 hasVolume "132" @default.
- W2064073178 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2064073178 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2064073178 magId "2064073178" @default.
- W2064073178 workType "article" @default.