Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2064756904> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 98 of
98
with 100 items per page.
- W2064756904 endingPage "997" @default.
- W2064756904 startingPage "986" @default.
- W2064756904 abstract "Summary Despite a strong uptake of evidence‐based approaches, conservation often proceeds from a grossly incomplete understanding of species priorities. To optimize conservation impact within a biogeographical region, quantitative knowledge is needed of the species present, which should be prioritized, and the management interventions these require. The next challenge is to avoid a proliferation of competing species plans, or conversely, a lack of detail within generic habitat‐based approaches. We present a methodology for biodiversity auditing. We quantified regional biodiversity by systematically collating available species records, allowing objective prioritization. We collated autecological information to integrate multiple species into management guilds with shared requirements, providing evidence‐based guidance for regional conservation. For two regions of E astern E ngland, B reckland (2300 km 2 ) and The B roads (2000 km 2 ), we collated 0·83 and 1·5‐million records, respectively. Numbers of species (12 845 and 11 067) and priority species (rare, threatened, designated or regionally restricted: 2097 and 1519, respectively) were orders of magnitude greater than previously recognized. Regional specialists, with a UK range largely or entirely restricted to the region, were poorly recognized posing a risk of regional homogenization. A large body of autecological information existed for priority species and collating this allowed us to define cross‐taxa management guilds. Numbers of priority species requiring different combinations of ecological processes and conditions were not matched by current conservation practice in B reckland. For example, the current agri‐environment agreements for designated grass heaths potentially catered for only 15% of the 542 priority species and 21% of 47 regional specialists that could potentially benefit from evidence‐based management. A focus on vegetation composition rather than the ecological requirements of priority species underpinned this failure. Synthesis and applications . The biodiversity audit approach provides an objective model for prioritization and cost‐effective conservation, applicable to regions of E urope where biodiversity has been well characterized. By using this approach to collate available information, management guilds with similar requirements can be defined across taxa, providing evidence‐based guidance for regional conservation." @default.
- W2064756904 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2064756904 creator A5035336470 @default.
- W2064756904 creator A5050686123 @default.
- W2064756904 creator A5082522017 @default.
- W2064756904 date "2012-08-06" @default.
- W2064756904 modified "2023-09-29" @default.
- W2064756904 title "The biodiversity audit approach challenges regional priorities and identifies a mismatch in conservation" @default.
- W2064756904 cites W1659955759 @default.
- W2064756904 cites W1757862121 @default.
- W2064756904 cites W1869680905 @default.
- W2064756904 cites W1977035173 @default.
- W2064756904 cites W2063207748 @default.
- W2064756904 cites W2075130020 @default.
- W2064756904 cites W2096369236 @default.
- W2064756904 cites W2142102480 @default.
- W2064756904 cites W2151672873 @default.
- W2064756904 cites W2165675708 @default.
- W2064756904 cites W2298625878 @default.
- W2064756904 cites W2323902279 @default.
- W2064756904 doi "https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02174.x" @default.
- W2064756904 hasPublicationYear "2012" @default.
- W2064756904 type Work @default.
- W2064756904 sameAs 2064756904 @default.
- W2064756904 citedByCount "34" @default.
- W2064756904 countsByYear W20647569042012 @default.
- W2064756904 countsByYear W20647569042013 @default.
- W2064756904 countsByYear W20647569042014 @default.
- W2064756904 countsByYear W20647569042015 @default.
- W2064756904 countsByYear W20647569042016 @default.
- W2064756904 countsByYear W20647569042017 @default.
- W2064756904 countsByYear W20647569042018 @default.
- W2064756904 countsByYear W20647569042019 @default.
- W2064756904 countsByYear W20647569042020 @default.
- W2064756904 countsByYear W20647569042021 @default.
- W2064756904 countsByYear W20647569042022 @default.
- W2064756904 countsByYear W20647569042023 @default.
- W2064756904 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2064756904 hasAuthorship W2064756904A5035336470 @default.
- W2064756904 hasAuthorship W2064756904A5050686123 @default.
- W2064756904 hasAuthorship W2064756904A5082522017 @default.
- W2064756904 hasBestOaLocation W20647569041 @default.
- W2064756904 hasConcept C107826830 @default.
- W2064756904 hasConcept C121955636 @default.
- W2064756904 hasConcept C126589399 @default.
- W2064756904 hasConcept C130217890 @default.
- W2064756904 hasConcept C144133560 @default.
- W2064756904 hasConcept C179345059 @default.
- W2064756904 hasConcept C185933670 @default.
- W2064756904 hasConcept C187604713 @default.
- W2064756904 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
- W2064756904 hasConcept C195094911 @default.
- W2064756904 hasConcept C199521495 @default.
- W2064756904 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
- W2064756904 hasConcept C24518262 @default.
- W2064756904 hasConcept C2777615720 @default.
- W2064756904 hasConcept C39432304 @default.
- W2064756904 hasConcept C71640776 @default.
- W2064756904 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
- W2064756904 hasConceptScore W2064756904C107826830 @default.
- W2064756904 hasConceptScore W2064756904C121955636 @default.
- W2064756904 hasConceptScore W2064756904C126589399 @default.
- W2064756904 hasConceptScore W2064756904C130217890 @default.
- W2064756904 hasConceptScore W2064756904C144133560 @default.
- W2064756904 hasConceptScore W2064756904C179345059 @default.
- W2064756904 hasConceptScore W2064756904C185933670 @default.
- W2064756904 hasConceptScore W2064756904C187604713 @default.
- W2064756904 hasConceptScore W2064756904C18903297 @default.
- W2064756904 hasConceptScore W2064756904C195094911 @default.
- W2064756904 hasConceptScore W2064756904C199521495 @default.
- W2064756904 hasConceptScore W2064756904C205649164 @default.
- W2064756904 hasConceptScore W2064756904C24518262 @default.
- W2064756904 hasConceptScore W2064756904C2777615720 @default.
- W2064756904 hasConceptScore W2064756904C39432304 @default.
- W2064756904 hasConceptScore W2064756904C71640776 @default.
- W2064756904 hasConceptScore W2064756904C86803240 @default.
- W2064756904 hasIssue "5" @default.
- W2064756904 hasLocation W20647569041 @default.
- W2064756904 hasLocation W20647569042 @default.
- W2064756904 hasOpenAccess W2064756904 @default.
- W2064756904 hasPrimaryLocation W20647569041 @default.
- W2064756904 hasRelatedWork W1975781997 @default.
- W2064756904 hasRelatedWork W2019419012 @default.
- W2064756904 hasRelatedWork W2047413928 @default.
- W2064756904 hasRelatedWork W2085394464 @default.
- W2064756904 hasRelatedWork W338007840 @default.
- W2064756904 hasRelatedWork W36578593 @default.
- W2064756904 hasRelatedWork W4283366390 @default.
- W2064756904 hasRelatedWork W4321238613 @default.
- W2064756904 hasRelatedWork W4323356654 @default.
- W2064756904 hasRelatedWork W4386307071 @default.
- W2064756904 hasVolume "49" @default.
- W2064756904 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2064756904 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2064756904 magId "2064756904" @default.
- W2064756904 workType "article" @default.