FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2064790809> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2064790809 endingPage "57" @default.
• W2064790809 startingPage "37" @default.
• W2064790809 abstract "A site-specific methodology was developed to assess and compare the ecotoxicological risk that agricultural pesticides pose to ecosystems. The ecological relative risk (EcoRR) is a composite scoring index for comparing relative risks between different plant protection products, and is used to assess the potential ecological impact their residues have after being applied to agricultural systems. The EcoRR model is based on standard frameworks for risk assessment (e.g. PEC/toxicity), but takes account of factors such as persistence of residues and biodiversity of ecosystems. The exposure module considers the environmental concentrations of a substance, its persistence, bioaccumulation and probability of exposure in several environmental compartments (water, sediment, soil, vegetation, air). The toxicity module takes into account the biodiversity of the ecosystems affected, whereby the endpoints used are weighted by the proportional contribution of each taxon in a given environmental compartment. EcoRR scores are calculated independently for each compartment and affected areas, thus enabling pinpointing of where risks will occur. The procedure to calculate EcoRR scores is explained using an example, and a sensitivity analysis of the model is included. A simulated risk assessment of 37 pesticides intended for use in a cotton development is also given as a case study. Exposure data were obtained using fugacity model II in areas previously defined by spray drift models. Toxicity data to vertebrate taxa and crustaceans were obtained from several databases, and biodiversity data from local sources. EcoRR scores were calculated for each compartment both on- and off-farm, during a normal growing season and during a flood, and a comparative relative assessment for all pesticides is discussed. EcoRR scores were also compared to traditional assessments using quotients for some taxa in the aquatic and terrestrial environments, revealing a good correlation between both models in some cases. It is apparent that EcoRR scores reflect adequately the potential risk of those chemicals to ecosystems, though they are less dependent on toxicity to sensitive species than the simple quotient. This methodology can be used either with field measured data or model predicted data, so management options for new chemicals can be tested prior to their application on crops." @default.
• W2064790809 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2064790809 creator A5015189250 @default.
• W2064790809 creator A5055994651 @default.
• W2064790809 creator A5078023025 @default.
• W2064790809 date "2002-09-01" @default.
• W2064790809 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2064790809 title "Ecological relative risk (EcoRR): another approach for risk assessment of pesticides in agriculture" @default.
• W2064790809 cites W125461999 @default.
• W2064790809 cites W1562809458 @default.
• W2064790809 cites W1967348481 @default.
• W2064790809 cites W1968037603 @default.
• W2064790809 cites W1972580296 @default.
• W2064790809 cites W1981224158 @default.
• W2064790809 cites W1982441136 @default.
• W2064790809 cites W1990086781 @default.
• W2064790809 cites W1990563581 @default.
• W2064790809 cites W1992043515 @default.
• W2064790809 cites W1995284161 @default.
• W2064790809 cites W2004455599 @default.
• W2064790809 cites W2018821613 @default.
• W2064790809 cites W2030667528 @default.
• W2064790809 cites W2031579181 @default.
• W2064790809 cites W2032264827 @default.
• W2064790809 cites W2037195267 @default.
• W2064790809 cites W2049556551 @default.
• W2064790809 cites W2055633962 @default.
• W2064790809 cites W2062064406 @default.
• W2064790809 cites W2067191339 @default.
• W2064790809 cites W2069973725 @default.
• W2064790809 cites W2077906574 @default.
• W2064790809 cites W2078850470 @default.
• W2064790809 cites W2079392573 @default.
• W2064790809 cites W2081224571 @default.
• W2064790809 cites W2081737593 @default.
• W2064790809 cites W2088768318 @default.
• W2064790809 cites W2093011196 @default.
• W2064790809 cites W2093363071 @default.
• W2064790809 cites W2094471601 @default.
• W2064790809 cites W2094592446 @default.
• W2064790809 cites W2099689505 @default.
• W2064790809 cites W2103620701 @default.
• W2064790809 cites W2112259651 @default.
• W2064790809 cites W2115563073 @default.
• W2064790809 cites W2117778440 @default.
• W2064790809 cites W2126465053 @default.
• W2064790809 cites W2160406170 @default.
• W2064790809 cites W2318278122 @default.
• W2064790809 cites W2327372412 @default.
• W2064790809 cites W2330670343 @default.
• W2064790809 cites W2529829811 @default.
• W2064790809 cites W30641405 @default.
• W2064790809 cites W4210944922 @default.
• W2064790809 cites W4256088045 @default.
• W2064790809 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-8809(01)00258-4" @default.
• W2064790809 hasPublicationYear "2002" @default.
• W2064790809 type Work @default.
• W2064790809 sameAs 2064790809 @default.
• W2064790809 citedByCount "165" @default.
• W2064790809 countsByYear W20647908092012 @default.
• W2064790809 countsByYear W20647908092013 @default.
• W2064790809 countsByYear W20647908092014 @default.
• W2064790809 countsByYear W20647908092015 @default.
• W2064790809 countsByYear W20647908092016 @default.
• W2064790809 countsByYear W20647908092017 @default.
• W2064790809 countsByYear W20647908092018 @default.
• W2064790809 countsByYear W20647908092019 @default.
• W2064790809 countsByYear W20647908092020 @default.
• W2064790809 countsByYear W20647908092021 @default.
• W2064790809 countsByYear W20647908092022 @default.
• W2064790809 countsByYear W20647908092023 @default.
• W2064790809 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2064790809 hasAuthorship W2064790809A5015189250 @default.
• W2064790809 hasAuthorship W2064790809A5055994651 @default.
• W2064790809 hasAuthorship W2064790809A5078023025 @default.
• W2064790809 hasConcept C110872660 @default.
• W2064790809 hasConcept C118518473 @default.
• W2064790809 hasConcept C12174686 @default.
• W2064790809 hasConcept C130217890 @default.
• W2064790809 hasConcept C18903297 @default.
• W2064790809 hasConcept C38652104 @default.
• W2064790809 hasConcept C39432304 @default.
• W2064790809 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
• W2064790809 hasConcept C71572567 @default.
• W2064790809 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2064790809 hasConceptScore W2064790809C110872660 @default.
• W2064790809 hasConceptScore W2064790809C118518473 @default.
• W2064790809 hasConceptScore W2064790809C12174686 @default.
• W2064790809 hasConceptScore W2064790809C130217890 @default.
• W2064790809 hasConceptScore W2064790809C18903297 @default.
• W2064790809 hasConceptScore W2064790809C38652104 @default.
• W2064790809 hasConceptScore W2064790809C39432304 @default.
• W2064790809 hasConceptScore W2064790809C41008148 @default.
• W2064790809 hasConceptScore W2064790809C71572567 @default.
• W2064790809 hasConceptScore W2064790809C86803240 @default.
• W2064790809 hasIssue "1-3" @default.
• W2064790809 hasLocation W20647908091 @default.
• W2064790809 hasOpenAccess W2064790809 @default.

• next