Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2065173618> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 85 of
85
with 100 items per page.
- W2065173618 endingPage "138" @default.
- W2065173618 startingPage "134" @default.
- W2065173618 abstract "The aim of the present study is to compare two analgesic techniques for ultrasound transrectal biopsy. Oral analgesia vs periprosthetic nerve blockade with 2% mevicaine.A total of 200 patients were randomized prospectively into 2 groups, namely group I: 100 patients treated with metamizol, oral morphine 30 minutes before the procedure, and group II: 100 patients anesthesied with periprosthetic nerve blockade with 2% mepivacaine. Both groups were treated with bromacepán 3 mg 30 minutes before the biopsy. The first intention was to obtain 10 core TRUS-guided biopsy in all patients underwent. After the procedure, a ten visual analogue pain score (VAS) from 0 = no discomfort to 10 = severe pain was administered to the biopsied patients and a global estimation of pain associated with the procedure was obtained. Test T de Student was used for statistical analysis.There were no significant differences in age, PSA and prostate volume. 3 core TRUS-guided biopsy were obtain in group I (3 +/- 1.3), and 10 in group II (5 +/- 1.2) In the periprosthetic block group (II) 95% of patients referred no pain after the procedure (VAS = 0), 2% middle pain (VAS = 5-6) and 3% strong pain (VAS = 7-8); while patients in group I referred 12.5% no pain, 42.4% middle pain, 20% strong pain. The level of pain reported by this group of patients was significantly different from those reported by patients who performed prostate biopsy with periprosthetic nerve blockade. (p < or = 0.05). There were no significant differences in major complications.The use of bilateral periprosthetic block with mepivacaine is a very effective and useful technique, well tolerated by the patient, which almost completely abolishes the pain and discomfort associated with the prostate biopsy procedure. And also allows increase the number of cores." @default.
- W2065173618 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2065173618 creator A5006616994 @default.
- W2065173618 creator A5016415376 @default.
- W2065173618 creator A5051852735 @default.
- W2065173618 creator A5052283466 @default.
- W2065173618 creator A5059289623 @default.
- W2065173618 creator A5062345275 @default.
- W2065173618 creator A5063926303 @default.
- W2065173618 creator A5065643453 @default.
- W2065173618 date "2006-01-01" @default.
- W2065173618 modified "2023-09-23" @default.
- W2065173618 title "Biopsia prostática ecodirigida: comparación de dos métodos anestésicos" @default.
- W2065173618 cites W1531448383 @default.
- W2065173618 cites W1964950095 @default.
- W2065173618 cites W1970239234 @default.
- W2065173618 cites W1971927835 @default.
- W2065173618 cites W1978320195 @default.
- W2065173618 cites W1978799761 @default.
- W2065173618 cites W1985221371 @default.
- W2065173618 cites W1995499528 @default.
- W2065173618 cites W2009288765 @default.
- W2065173618 cites W2022663472 @default.
- W2065173618 cites W2053315602 @default.
- W2065173618 cites W2065448180 @default.
- W2065173618 cites W2095362469 @default.
- W2065173618 cites W2098609431 @default.
- W2065173618 cites W2102075973 @default.
- W2065173618 cites W2109640864 @default.
- W2065173618 cites W2119167807 @default.
- W2065173618 cites W2154097131 @default.
- W2065173618 cites W2157878498 @default.
- W2065173618 cites W2413199256 @default.
- W2065173618 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/s0210-4806(06)73414-3" @default.
- W2065173618 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16700202" @default.
- W2065173618 hasPublicationYear "2006" @default.
- W2065173618 type Work @default.
- W2065173618 sameAs 2065173618 @default.
- W2065173618 citedByCount "5" @default.
- W2065173618 countsByYear W20651736182012 @default.
- W2065173618 countsByYear W20651736182013 @default.
- W2065173618 countsByYear W20651736182016 @default.
- W2065173618 countsByYear W20651736182019 @default.
- W2065173618 countsByYear W20651736182020 @default.
- W2065173618 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2065173618 hasAuthorship W2065173618A5006616994 @default.
- W2065173618 hasAuthorship W2065173618A5016415376 @default.
- W2065173618 hasAuthorship W2065173618A5051852735 @default.
- W2065173618 hasAuthorship W2065173618A5052283466 @default.
- W2065173618 hasAuthorship W2065173618A5059289623 @default.
- W2065173618 hasAuthorship W2065173618A5062345275 @default.
- W2065173618 hasAuthorship W2065173618A5063926303 @default.
- W2065173618 hasAuthorship W2065173618A5065643453 @default.
- W2065173618 hasBestOaLocation W20651736182 @default.
- W2065173618 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W2065173618 hasConcept C15708023 @default.
- W2065173618 hasConcept C29456083 @default.
- W2065173618 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2065173618 hasConceptScore W2065173618C138885662 @default.
- W2065173618 hasConceptScore W2065173618C15708023 @default.
- W2065173618 hasConceptScore W2065173618C29456083 @default.
- W2065173618 hasConceptScore W2065173618C71924100 @default.
- W2065173618 hasIssue "2" @default.
- W2065173618 hasLocation W20651736181 @default.
- W2065173618 hasLocation W20651736182 @default.
- W2065173618 hasLocation W20651736183 @default.
- W2065173618 hasOpenAccess W2065173618 @default.
- W2065173618 hasPrimaryLocation W20651736181 @default.
- W2065173618 hasRelatedWork W1592700293 @default.
- W2065173618 hasRelatedWork W1988604339 @default.
- W2065173618 hasRelatedWork W1989512926 @default.
- W2065173618 hasRelatedWork W2034503869 @default.
- W2065173618 hasRelatedWork W2035666419 @default.
- W2065173618 hasRelatedWork W2322932480 @default.
- W2065173618 hasRelatedWork W2432366219 @default.
- W2065173618 hasRelatedWork W2769273672 @default.
- W2065173618 hasRelatedWork W3160624433 @default.
- W2065173618 hasRelatedWork W2513953236 @default.
- W2065173618 hasVolume "30" @default.
- W2065173618 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2065173618 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2065173618 magId "2065173618" @default.
- W2065173618 workType "article" @default.