FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2065200246> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2065200246 abstract "Abstract This paper demonstrates how the bound wave, the spectrum of the second-order difference frequency force on an LNG carrier, and the moored ship's dynamic response increase with increasing period of the fundamental wave spectrum. The paper demonstrates the key engineering issues and concepts with analysis results for a conventionally moored LNG carrier. These issues are important because, unless they are understood, ship motions and mooring loads can be significantly underestimated. Introduction Irregular waves in deepwater contain small, low-frequency bound waves associated with the fundamental wave groups. As the fundamental waves encounter shallow water, the amplitude of the bound wave increases. This bound wave is sometimes called the setdown wave because it reduces a ship's under-keel clearance. Figure 1 shows a short timehistory of an irregular fundamental wave along with its associated low-frequency bound wave. The bound wave amplitude is generally positive when the fundamental wave amplitude is low, and is generally negative when the fundamental wave amplitude is high. The bound waves, and the associated low-frequency dynamic wave loads that excite the resonant surge, sway and yaw modes of moored, floating systems, are produced by non-linear interactions between the frequency components of the irregular fundamental wave. This paper demonstrates that the bound wave amplitude, he spectrum of the second-order difference frequency (lowfrequency) forces on a typical LNG carrier, and the moored ship's dynamic response increase with increasing wave period. The paper demonstrates key concepts by presenting and interpreting the results of 2nd-order diffraction/radiation analysis, and non-linear, time-domain, ship motions/mooring analysis for a typical carrier with an LNG capacity of 138,000 cu m. The authors encountered these issues while assessing the dynamic performance of alternative designs for an LNG marine terminal located offshore a coast that is exposed to persistent long-period (low-frequency) swells. The relatively shallow water and the long wave periods combined to produce low-frequency dynamic wave forces on the moored ship that produced resonant surge, sway and yaw motions, and mooring responses, that were remarkably high. We found that industryaccepted ynamic analysis tools that are routinely applied to moored structures in deepwater are not universally applicable to these shallow water conditions, and that they can lead to calculated responses that are very unconservative. Ship & Mooring Characteristics Figure 2 shows the ship in a conventional mooring consisting of 6 mooring dolphins outfitted with quick-release mooring hooks, and 4 breasting dolphins outfitted with rubber fenders. The mooring line stiffness is controlled by the standard 11m long nylon tail that connects each steel line segment to the hook. These nylon segments are flexible relative to the steel line that runs through the ship chocks to the on-board winches. Each mooring line is pre-tensioned to about 10% of its minimum breaking strength to pre-load the ship against the fenders. Figure 3 shows the force (vs) offset curves for the fenders and for a typical mooring line. Both are highly non-linear. Rather than resist tension (positive displacement on Figure 3), the fenders gap, and rather than resist compression (negative displacement on Figure 3), the mooring lines go slack." @default.
• W2065200246 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2065200246 creator A5030514556 @default.
• W2065200246 creator A5037438147 @default.
• W2065200246 date "2004-05-03" @default.
• W2065200246 modified "2023-09-25" @default.
• W2065200246 title "Shallow Water Effects On Low-Frequency Wave Excitation of Moored Ships" @default.
• W2065200246 doi "https://doi.org/10.4043/16718-ms" @default.
• W2065200246 hasPublicationYear "2004" @default.
• W2065200246 type Work @default.
• W2065200246 sameAs 2065200246 @default.
• W2065200246 citedByCount "1" @default.
• W2065200246 countsByYear W20652002462015 @default.
• W2065200246 crossrefType "proceedings-article" @default.
• W2065200246 hasAuthorship W2065200246A5030514556 @default.
• W2065200246 hasAuthorship W2065200246A5037438147 @default.
• W2065200246 hasConcept C111368507 @default.
• W2065200246 hasConcept C127313418 @default.
• W2065200246 hasConcept C127413603 @default.
• W2065200246 hasConcept C186348155 @default.
• W2065200246 hasConcept C199104240 @default.
• W2065200246 hasConcept C39432304 @default.
• W2065200246 hasConceptScore W2065200246C111368507 @default.
• W2065200246 hasConceptScore W2065200246C127313418 @default.
• W2065200246 hasConceptScore W2065200246C127413603 @default.
• W2065200246 hasConceptScore W2065200246C186348155 @default.
• W2065200246 hasConceptScore W2065200246C199104240 @default.
• W2065200246 hasConceptScore W2065200246C39432304 @default.
• W2065200246 hasLocation W20652002461 @default.
• W2065200246 hasOpenAccess W2065200246 @default.
• W2065200246 hasPrimaryLocation W20652002461 @default.
• W2065200246 hasRelatedWork W1980241788 @default.
• W2065200246 hasRelatedWork W1981155388 @default.
• W2065200246 hasRelatedWork W2006366419 @default.
• W2065200246 hasRelatedWork W2014386722 @default.
• W2065200246 hasRelatedWork W2062819795 @default.
• W2065200246 hasRelatedWork W2077414269 @default.
• W2065200246 hasRelatedWork W2185504619 @default.
• W2065200246 hasRelatedWork W2377393101 @default.
• W2065200246 hasRelatedWork W3160008994 @default.
• W2065200246 hasRelatedWork W2184101051 @default.
• W2065200246 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2065200246 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2065200246 magId "2065200246" @default.
• W2065200246 workType "article" @default.