FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2065280712> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2065280712 endingPage "147" @default.
• W2065280712 startingPage "143" @default.
• W2065280712 abstract "Obtaining informed consent before performing invasive procedures and operations has become a standard practice at all medical institutions in the United States. All agree that patients should be both conscious of and in agreement with their medical care. Though patients routinely sign consent forms with numerous risks and complications detailed, there are only a limited amount of reports that study if these patients have a thorough understanding of those risks and complications. Confounding the issue of the efficacy of informed consents is the growing population of patients who do not speak English. To obtain objective data on the efficacy of informed consents and the role of language barriers we looked at how well patients who consented to have a laparoscopic cholecystectomy understood the complications associated with this procedure.We conducted a randomized prospective study of all patients seen in the General Surgery Resident Outpatient Clinic who presented for an elective cholecystectomy. Fifty patients agreed to participate in our study. Participants were split into two groups. In the first group (the control group) surgical benefits, risks and complications were explained in the usual fashion. In the second group, after hearing the standard explanation of surgical risks, complications and benefits, patients watched a PowerPoint presentation with illustrations on laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Patients from both groups then took a ten question assessment based on the presentations that they encountered. Spanish speaking patients were addressed with an interpreter and given a Spanish PowerPoint presentation with a Spanish assessment. The patients' age, education level, income, and birth country were also studied.Fifty-two percent of the patients in the study were born outside of the United States. All of the non-US born patients were Hispanic and their primary language was Spanish. The average age of the studied patients was 38. Sixty-eight percent of the patients reported an education level no higher than high school. The majority of the studied patients noted an income of less than $40,000. Differences were seen between patient native to the US and those born outside the United States. US born patients had an 80% correct response rate versus non-US born patients who had only a 63% correct response. Differences were seen between US born patient and non-US born patients concerning the topics of the severity of a common bile duct injury, gastrointestinal changes after cholecystectomy and the safety concerning conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. No difference was appreciated in the PowerPoint group versus the non-PowerPoint group.The addition of a PowerPoint presentation did not increase understanding of the risks and benefits associated with a laparoscopic cholecystectomy. This study did however highlight the problem of obtaining consent from foreign born patients. Patients who were not US natives showed a decreased understanding of the surgical procedure and the severity of the complications in both the control group and the PowerPoint group. Better methods of educating foreign patients should be investigated to truly obtain informed consents from this patient population." @default.
• W2065280712 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2065280712 creator A5001830267 @default.
• W2065280712 creator A5032236501 @default.
• W2065280712 creator A5034042373 @default.
• W2065280712 creator A5074233160 @default.
• W2065280712 creator A5082263508 @default.
• W2065280712 date "2011-03-01" @default.
• W2065280712 modified "2023-10-10" @default.
• W2065280712 title "The Informed Consent: A Study of the Efficacy of Informed Consents and the Associated Role of Language Barriers" @default.
• W2065280712 cites W154762028 @default.
• W2065280712 cites W1989092543 @default.
• W2065280712 cites W1990078711 @default.
• W2065280712 cites W2007798686 @default.
• W2065280712 cites W2024405551 @default.
• W2065280712 cites W2067871445 @default.
• W2065280712 cites W2078808983 @default.
• W2065280712 cites W2121447994 @default.
• W2065280712 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2010.09.009" @default.
• W2065280712 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21338973" @default.
• W2065280712 hasPublicationYear "2011" @default.
• W2065280712 type Work @default.
• W2065280712 sameAs 2065280712 @default.
• W2065280712 citedByCount "33" @default.
• W2065280712 countsByYear W20652807122012 @default.
• W2065280712 countsByYear W20652807122013 @default.
• W2065280712 countsByYear W20652807122014 @default.
• W2065280712 countsByYear W20652807122015 @default.
• W2065280712 countsByYear W20652807122016 @default.
• W2065280712 countsByYear W20652807122017 @default.
• W2065280712 countsByYear W20652807122019 @default.
• W2065280712 countsByYear W20652807122020 @default.
• W2065280712 countsByYear W20652807122021 @default.
• W2065280712 countsByYear W20652807122022 @default.
• W2065280712 countsByYear W20652807122023 @default.
• W2065280712 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2065280712 hasAuthorship W2065280712A5001830267 @default.
• W2065280712 hasAuthorship W2065280712A5032236501 @default.
• W2065280712 hasAuthorship W2065280712A5034042373 @default.
• W2065280712 hasAuthorship W2065280712A5074233160 @default.
• W2065280712 hasAuthorship W2065280712A5082263508 @default.
• W2065280712 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2065280712 hasConcept C142724271 @default.
• W2065280712 hasConcept C187212893 @default.
• W2065280712 hasConcept C204787440 @default.
• W2065280712 hasConcept C2777601897 @default.
• W2065280712 hasConcept C2908647359 @default.
• W2065280712 hasConcept C512399662 @default.
• W2065280712 hasConcept C61434518 @default.
• W2065280712 hasConcept C68122502 @default.
• W2065280712 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2065280712 hasConcept C99454951 @default.
• W2065280712 hasConceptScore W2065280712C141071460 @default.
• W2065280712 hasConceptScore W2065280712C142724271 @default.
• W2065280712 hasConceptScore W2065280712C187212893 @default.
• W2065280712 hasConceptScore W2065280712C204787440 @default.
• W2065280712 hasConceptScore W2065280712C2777601897 @default.
• W2065280712 hasConceptScore W2065280712C2908647359 @default.
• W2065280712 hasConceptScore W2065280712C512399662 @default.
• W2065280712 hasConceptScore W2065280712C61434518 @default.
• W2065280712 hasConceptScore W2065280712C68122502 @default.
• W2065280712 hasConceptScore W2065280712C71924100 @default.
• W2065280712 hasConceptScore W2065280712C99454951 @default.
• W2065280712 hasIssue "2" @default.
• W2065280712 hasLocation W20652807121 @default.
• W2065280712 hasLocation W20652807122 @default.
• W2065280712 hasOpenAccess W2065280712 @default.
• W2065280712 hasPrimaryLocation W20652807121 @default.
• W2065280712 hasRelatedWork W2003938723 @default.
• W2065280712 hasRelatedWork W2047967234 @default.
• W2065280712 hasRelatedWork W2118496982 @default.
• W2065280712 hasRelatedWork W2364998975 @default.
• W2065280712 hasRelatedWork W2369162477 @default.
• W2065280712 hasRelatedWork W2439875401 @default.
• W2065280712 hasRelatedWork W4238867864 @default.
• W2065280712 hasRelatedWork W2525756941 @default.
• W2065280712 hasRelatedWork W4214799196 @default.
• W2065280712 hasRelatedWork W4214955067 @default.
• W2065280712 hasVolume "68" @default.
• W2065280712 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2065280712 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2065280712 magId "2065280712" @default.
• W2065280712 workType "article" @default.