FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2065333414> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2065333414 endingPage "1000" @default.
• W2065333414 startingPage "999" @default.
• W2065333414 abstract "Despite the widespread use of prostate-specific antigen in the early detection of prostate cancer (PCa), the number of patients with pathologically positive lymph nodes at radical prostatectomy (RP) remains substantial [1–3]. It is well known that the larger the extension of pelvic lymphadenectomy, the greater the chance of finding a positive node [1– 4]. In addition, the overall number of positive nodes found in a single patientwill typically increase alongwith the total number of nodes removed [1,4,5]. This being said, it has been suggested that the key element influencing the number of nodes removed during pelvic lymphadenectomy has less to do with the technique used (open, laparoscopic, or robotic assisted) than with the scientific beliefs of the surgeon performing the procedure. In other words, a skilled surgeon can remove a large quantity of pelvic and retroperitoneal nodes in any PCa patient, regardless of the technique used [6]. Although we do not yet have level 1 evidence suggesting that the number of nodes removed during RP and pelvic lymph node dissection affects cancerspecific and/or overall survival, data have been accumulating to suggest that a thoroughly performed lymphadenectomy represents a pillar of the multimodal approach to patients with high-risk PCa [2,3,7]. In this month’s issue of European Urology, KleinJan et al. report on a new technical modification of the sentinel node biopsy procedure used in patients with PCa who are at risk for nodal metastases [8]. We have been strong supporters of technical innovations that may ultimately represent a major advance in the level of care offered to our patients. The authors are commended for performing a welldesigned study in an area, sentinel node biopsy, that remains of interest for a number of different cancers." @default.
• W2065333414 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2065333414 creator A5023266580 @default.
• W2065333414 creator A5061623935 @default.
• W2065333414 date "2014-12-01" @default.
• W2065333414 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2065333414 title "Sentinel Node Biopsy for Prostate Cancer: A Useless Surgical Exercise?" @default.
• W2065333414 cites W2045886269 @default.
• W2065333414 cites W2050295344 @default.
• W2065333414 cites W2080928007 @default.
• W2065333414 cites W2087183792 @default.
• W2065333414 cites W2095183081 @default.
• W2065333414 cites W2116692433 @default.
• W2065333414 cites W2119995188 @default.
• W2065333414 cites W2123230901 @default.
• W2065333414 cites W2143802196 @default.
• W2065333414 cites W2146186748 @default.
• W2065333414 cites W2165217523 @default.
• W2065333414 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2014.08.052" @default.
• W2065333414 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25199716" @default.
• W2065333414 hasPublicationYear "2014" @default.
• W2065333414 type Work @default.
• W2065333414 sameAs 2065333414 @default.
• W2065333414 citedByCount "0" @default.
• W2065333414 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2065333414 hasAuthorship W2065333414A5023266580 @default.
• W2065333414 hasAuthorship W2065333414A5061623935 @default.
• W2065333414 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2065333414 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2065333414 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
• W2065333414 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2065333414 hasConcept C179671157 @default.
• W2065333414 hasConcept C2775934546 @default.
• W2065333414 hasConcept C2776235491 @default.
• W2065333414 hasConcept C2780192828 @default.
• W2065333414 hasConcept C2781217009 @default.
• W2065333414 hasConcept C530470458 @default.
• W2065333414 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2065333414 hasConceptScore W2065333414C121608353 @default.
• W2065333414 hasConceptScore W2065333414C126322002 @default.
• W2065333414 hasConceptScore W2065333414C126838900 @default.
• W2065333414 hasConceptScore W2065333414C141071460 @default.
• W2065333414 hasConceptScore W2065333414C179671157 @default.
• W2065333414 hasConceptScore W2065333414C2775934546 @default.
• W2065333414 hasConceptScore W2065333414C2776235491 @default.
• W2065333414 hasConceptScore W2065333414C2780192828 @default.
• W2065333414 hasConceptScore W2065333414C2781217009 @default.
• W2065333414 hasConceptScore W2065333414C530470458 @default.
• W2065333414 hasConceptScore W2065333414C71924100 @default.
• W2065333414 hasIssue "6" @default.
• W2065333414 hasLocation W20653334141 @default.
• W2065333414 hasLocation W20653334142 @default.
• W2065333414 hasOpenAccess W2065333414 @default.
• W2065333414 hasPrimaryLocation W20653334141 @default.
• W2065333414 hasRelatedWork W1551416944 @default.
• W2065333414 hasRelatedWork W1725314107 @default.
• W2065333414 hasRelatedWork W1884231116 @default.
• W2065333414 hasRelatedWork W2102167265 @default.
• W2065333414 hasRelatedWork W2168798245 @default.
• W2065333414 hasRelatedWork W2394564140 @default.
• W2065333414 hasRelatedWork W2409990396 @default.
• W2065333414 hasRelatedWork W2566665866 @default.
• W2065333414 hasRelatedWork W2785380349 @default.
• W2065333414 hasRelatedWork W3197418554 @default.
• W2065333414 hasVolume "66" @default.
• W2065333414 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2065333414 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2065333414 magId "2065333414" @default.
• W2065333414 workType "article" @default.