FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2065438078> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2065438078 endingPage "411" @default.
• W2065438078 startingPage "410" @default.
• W2065438078 abstract "Whiten et al. imply that we undervalued extant species. We find this perplexing. We never stated that studies of extant chimpanzees are unimportant. Our conclusions were based on intensive review of homologous anatomical traits in other primates. Indeed, to understand hominid origins, we must now instead rely on “fundamental evolutionary theory,” which Whiten et al. refer to as “strategic modeling.” Increasingly relevant is a vast and still growing knowledge of ecological, locomotor, social, and reproductive interrelationships of not just chimpanzees, but other primates and a wide variety of other vertebrates. In fact, using “data on extant species…to derive general principles” was exactly our approach—the majority of the 108 citations in the final Ardipithecus paper referenced such studies. We expressly advocated more intensive reliance on additional living species (beyond Pan ) because these promise a more comprehensive understanding of social structure in advanced K primates (e.g., Brachyteles and other atelines), creation and use of tools (e.g., Cebus ), and even neuroendocrinology (voles and several primates).A broad comparative base is equally imperative for accurate phylogenetic analyses, particularly those involving cladistics. The potential of the latter methods to accurately “recover” ancestral phenotypes by parsimony relies on the presence and density of taxa (both extinct and extant) surrounding the nodes of interest. This has been empirically shown with morphological data sets ([ 1 ][1]) and certainly also applies to behaviors. For example, cladistic analysis of extant species may retrieve the locomotor behavioral trait of knuckle-walking, as the nodal phenotype for the Pan/Homo common ancestor, but the Ardipithecus forelimb shows that this inference is simplistic and almost certainly incorrect. Indeed, Ardipithecus and other Miocene hominoids establish that extant chimpanzees are poor models for our last common ancestor with chimpanzees. Contrary to Whiten et al. 's assertions, this conclusion was informed, and should be further extended, by general principles established from all relevant species. All great ape species merit study and conservation, but despite their genomic proximity, none of them should be interpreted as anatomically or behaviorally “living fossils” or “time machines.”1. [↵][2] 1. D. S. Strait, 2. F. E. Grine , J. Hum. Evol. 47, 399 (2004). [OpenUrl][3][CrossRef][4][PubMed][5][Web of Science][6] [1]: #ref-1 [2]: #xref-ref-1-1 View reference 1 in text [3]: {openurl}?query=rft.jtitle%253DJournal%2Bof%2BHuman%2BEvolution%26rft.stitle%253DJournal%2Bof%2BHuman%2BEvolution%26rft.aulast%253DStrait%26rft.auinit1%253DD.%2BS.%26rft.volume%253D47%26rft.issue%253D6%26rft.spage%253D399%26rft.epage%253D452%26rft.atitle%253DInferring%2Bhominoid%2Band%2Bearly%2Bhominid%2Bphylogeny%2Busing%2Bcraniodental%2Bcharacters%253A%2Bthe%2Brole%2Bof%2Bfossil%2Btaxa.%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Adoi%252F10.1016%252Fj.jhevol.2004.08.008%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Apmid%252F15566946%26rft.genre%253Darticle%26rft_val_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Ajournal%26ctx_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ctx_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Actx [4]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.jhevol.2004.08.008&link_type=DOI [5]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=15566946&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fsci%2F327%2F5964%2F410.2.atom [6]: /lookup/external-ref?access_num=000227253500002&link_type=ISI" @default.
• W2065438078 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2065438078 creator A5036448244 @default.
• W2065438078 creator A5080493991 @default.
• W2065438078 creator A5084912400 @default.
• W2065438078 date "2010-01-22" @default.
• W2065438078 modified "2023-10-03" @default.
• W2065438078 title "Studying Extant Species to Model Our Past—Response" @default.
• W2065438078 cites W1997021896 @default.
• W2065438078 doi "https://doi.org/10.1126/science.327.5964.410-b" @default.
• W2065438078 hasPublicationYear "2010" @default.
• W2065438078 type Work @default.
• W2065438078 sameAs 2065438078 @default.
• W2065438078 citedByCount "5" @default.
• W2065438078 countsByYear W20654380782012 @default.
• W2065438078 countsByYear W20654380782013 @default.
• W2065438078 countsByYear W20654380782015 @default.
• W2065438078 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2065438078 hasAuthorship W2065438078A5036448244 @default.
• W2065438078 hasAuthorship W2065438078A5080493991 @default.
• W2065438078 hasAuthorship W2065438078A5084912400 @default.
• W2065438078 hasConcept C178300618 @default.
• W2065438078 hasConcept C205649164 @default.
• W2065438078 hasConcept C78458016 @default.
• W2065438078 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2065438078 hasConceptScore W2065438078C178300618 @default.
• W2065438078 hasConceptScore W2065438078C205649164 @default.
• W2065438078 hasConceptScore W2065438078C78458016 @default.
• W2065438078 hasConceptScore W2065438078C86803240 @default.
• W2065438078 hasIssue "5964" @default.
• W2065438078 hasLocation W20654380781 @default.
• W2065438078 hasOpenAccess W2065438078 @default.
• W2065438078 hasPrimaryLocation W20654380781 @default.
• W2065438078 hasRelatedWork W1828955125 @default.
• W2065438078 hasRelatedWork W2017361174 @default.
• W2065438078 hasRelatedWork W2034736453 @default.
• W2065438078 hasRelatedWork W2044499740 @default.
• W2065438078 hasRelatedWork W2061542922 @default.
• W2065438078 hasRelatedWork W2096678084 @default.
• W2065438078 hasRelatedWork W2108755814 @default.
• W2065438078 hasRelatedWork W2190176143 @default.
• W2065438078 hasRelatedWork W3048727301 @default.
• W2065438078 hasRelatedWork W4230593899 @default.
• W2065438078 hasVolume "327" @default.
• W2065438078 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2065438078 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2065438078 magId "2065438078" @default.
• W2065438078 workType "article" @default.