FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2065467803> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2065467803 endingPage "19" @default.
• W2065467803 startingPage "1" @default.
• W2065467803 abstract "COMPARATIVE 9T9TJÍ19 Volume 36 Nos. 1,2· Spring/Summer 2002 Laughter in Medieval English Drama: A Critique ofModernizing and HistoricalAnalyses Hans-Jürgen Diller Laughing, like weeping, is a spontaneous, involuntary expression of our emotions.1 It is a window through which we can look inside our fellow humans and without which we would probably not be viable as social beings. What we observe through this window is a fascinating sight, especially when the people we observe have lived many centuries before us. We must, however, be able to interpret what we see. This is particularly important for the laughter ofthe past. It would be desirable ifhistorical research could always distinguish neady between situations in which somebody had to laugh and situations in which everybody was meant to laugh.2 I am not aware of a study of medieval laughter that makes, let alone problematizes, this distinction. The frequent references by Mikhail Bakhtin and his followers to the medieval culture oflaughter suggest that everybody was meant to laugh, but in the records of medieval drama the instances in which somebody had to laugh are far 2 Comparative Drama more frequent. Nevertheless, we must also assume that there were numerous scenes at which the audience was meant to laugh, even though we are unlikely to find cogent proof of this in die records. To discover such occasions we must interpretthe dramatic texts themselves, and there we are always in danger of believing that our ancestors had the same prejudices as we. Most of us like to laugh, but our acculturation also tells us that in many situations we must not laugh. Laughter about obscene, racist, or sexist jokes is disapproved of in our culture. Laughter about somebody else's misfortunes—mat which in German and many other languages is called Schadenfreude—is also objectionable. When we cannot suppress such laughter we are embarrassed and apologize. The point is one for which the MiddleAges are difficult for modern men and women who flatter themselves that tliey have undergone what Norbert Elias has called the civilization process. The religious literature of the Middle Ages especially is full of the terrible fate that awaits the damned but which apparendy is not meant to call forth sympathy; on the contrary, Schadenfreude, even triumphant derision, seems to be the intended reaction.3 The modern critic who catches himself or herself enjoying such texts has a guilty conscience, and this has prompted many attempts to wrest, especially from dramatic texts, an alternative interpretation to make them more acceptable to our modern tastes. In the criticism ofEnglish medieval drama, such interpretatio moderna can look back on an impressive tradition. Since me groundbreaking work ofE. K. Chambers it has been common to value those plays highlywhich were most secularised in that they presented comical, nonbiblical scenes. Particularly influential have been the studies ofA. P. Rossiter and Robert Weimann, both ofwhom are Shakespeareans rather than medievalists .4 From such a vantage point it was only natural to emphasize those features thatcould be regarded aspavingthe wayfor Shakespeare. Only in the 1950s and 1960s was the principle accepted that medieval plays should be viewed against the ideological and social background of their own time and that the evolutionism of earlier decades should be rejected as anachronistic.5 But the pendulum is swinging back again. Whereas thirty or forty years ago the alterity of the Middle Ages was emphasized above all, we can now observe a tendency to integrate the Hans-Jürgen Diller3 medieval drama into our modern reception horizon with the help of such categories as Bakhtin's culture of laughter. The crown witnesses that are cited for this interpretatio postmoderna are largely the same plays as were preferred by Chambers and his followers. In the first place they are those of the so-called Wakefield Master, who was once celebrated as the great realist ofmedieval English drama. Another example, more popular now than formerly, is the late-fifteenth-century morality play Mankind, which for a long time was regarded as vulgar and degenerate .6 Unfortunately, these are plays whose staging conditions are still highlycontroversial and, in the absence ofrelated documentaryevidence , are likely to remain so. In the..." @default.
• W2065467803 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2065467803 creator A5075581541 @default.
• W2065467803 date "2002-01-01" @default.
• W2065467803 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2065467803 title "Laughter in Medieval English Drama: A Critique of Modernizing and Historical Analyses" @default.
• W2065467803 cites W121054399 @default.
• W2065467803 cites W128784912 @default.
• W2065467803 cites W1513875112 @default.
• W2065467803 cites W1560675797 @default.
• W2065467803 cites W1592840566 @default.
• W2065467803 cites W1993601034 @default.
• W2065467803 cites W1999795308 @default.
• W2065467803 cites W2013187183 @default.
• W2065467803 cites W2023226432 @default.
• W2065467803 cites W2035177576 @default.
• W2065467803 cites W2048613080 @default.
• W2065467803 cites W2055949609 @default.
• W2065467803 cites W2060736593 @default.
• W2065467803 cites W2069370547 @default.
• W2065467803 cites W2085924104 @default.
• W2065467803 cites W2094616960 @default.
• W2065467803 cites W2295011300 @default.
• W2065467803 cites W2314969120 @default.
• W2065467803 cites W2321675728 @default.
• W2065467803 cites W2324555567 @default.
• W2065467803 cites W2327638863 @default.
• W2065467803 cites W2331679340 @default.
• W2065467803 cites W2796909782 @default.
• W2065467803 cites W2801985970 @default.
• W2065467803 cites W2809077728 @default.
• W2065467803 cites W2941129222 @default.
• W2065467803 cites W3168031224 @default.
• W2065467803 cites W412644168 @default.
• W2065467803 cites W609769611 @default.
• W2065467803 cites W610549439 @default.
• W2065467803 cites W625318308 @default.
• W2065467803 cites W628274879 @default.
• W2065467803 cites W636495122 @default.
• W2065467803 cites W644744237 @default.
• W2065467803 cites W648835003 @default.
• W2065467803 cites W657371244 @default.
• W2065467803 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/cdr.2002.0006" @default.
• W2065467803 hasPublicationYear "2002" @default.
• W2065467803 type Work @default.
• W2065467803 sameAs 2065467803 @default.
• W2065467803 citedByCount "8" @default.
• W2065467803 countsByYear W20654678032018 @default.
• W2065467803 countsByYear W20654678032019 @default.
• W2065467803 countsByYear W20654678032020 @default.
• W2065467803 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2065467803 hasAuthorship W2065467803A5075581541 @default.
• W2065467803 hasConcept C107038049 @default.
• W2065467803 hasConcept C124952713 @default.
• W2065467803 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W2065467803 hasConcept C2776445246 @default.
• W2065467803 hasConcept C2780775679 @default.
• W2065467803 hasConcept C523419034 @default.
• W2065467803 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W2065467803 hasConceptScore W2065467803C107038049 @default.
• W2065467803 hasConceptScore W2065467803C124952713 @default.
• W2065467803 hasConceptScore W2065467803C142362112 @default.
• W2065467803 hasConceptScore W2065467803C2776445246 @default.
• W2065467803 hasConceptScore W2065467803C2780775679 @default.
• W2065467803 hasConceptScore W2065467803C523419034 @default.
• W2065467803 hasConceptScore W2065467803C95457728 @default.
• W2065467803 hasIssue "1-2" @default.
• W2065467803 hasLocation W20654678031 @default.
• W2065467803 hasOpenAccess W2065467803 @default.
• W2065467803 hasPrimaryLocation W20654678031 @default.
• W2065467803 hasRelatedWork W2112856469 @default.
• W2065467803 hasRelatedWork W2314185962 @default.
• W2065467803 hasRelatedWork W2373178889 @default.
• W2065467803 hasRelatedWork W2385532801 @default.
• W2065467803 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2065467803 hasRelatedWork W2798221657 @default.
• W2065467803 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
• W2065467803 hasRelatedWork W3150454321 @default.
• W2065467803 hasRelatedWork W4327586668 @default.
• W2065467803 hasRelatedWork W641527250 @default.
• W2065467803 hasVolume "36" @default.
• W2065467803 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2065467803 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2065467803 magId "2065467803" @default.
• W2065467803 workType "article" @default.