Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2065765891> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 85 of
85
with 100 items per page.
- W2065765891 endingPage "120" @default.
- W2065765891 startingPage "98" @default.
- W2065765891 abstract "There has been a slow but steady accretion of findings on doctoral assessment and examination processes over the past decade and a half. The study of Australian PhD examination reported here draws on the written reports on 301 theses across all discipline areas. Text categories identified in the reports are linked to other data including the recommendation examiners give the thesis and the final report of the committee. The assessment discourse of examiners is explored in depth with reference to high- and low-quality theses. The questions addressed are: (1) What qualities, attributes and characteristics of the thesis are examiners emphasising in their reports? (2) What form does their evaluative comment take? (3) What can the reports indicate about the relative strengths and weaknesses of a thesis and the standards examiners apply in determining a recommendation? and (4) what areas of report content and types of comment most clearly differentiate between the high-and low-quality theses? While it was evident in the reports that examiners weigh and balance many features of the thesis against their expectations to arrive at a recommendation, there were three general criteria that distinguished each of high-quality low-quality theses." @default.
- W2065765891 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2065765891 creator A5003736661 @default.
- W2065765891 creator A5020741534 @default.
- W2065765891 creator A5071963579 @default.
- W2065765891 creator A5086697164 @default.
- W2065765891 date "2004-01-01" @default.
- W2065765891 modified "2023-10-18" @default.
- W2065765891 title "Investigating PhD thesis examination reports" @default.
- W2065765891 cites W1964655911 @default.
- W2065765891 cites W1984549605 @default.
- W2065765891 cites W1994521217 @default.
- W2065765891 cites W2000971519 @default.
- W2065765891 cites W2007925940 @default.
- W2065765891 cites W2025695583 @default.
- W2065765891 cites W2031238215 @default.
- W2065765891 cites W2075490552 @default.
- W2065765891 cites W2104743387 @default.
- W2065765891 cites W2121102951 @default.
- W2065765891 cites W2123023477 @default.
- W2065765891 cites W2127393384 @default.
- W2065765891 cites W2132028633 @default.
- W2065765891 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2005.04.008" @default.
- W2065765891 hasPublicationYear "2004" @default.
- W2065765891 type Work @default.
- W2065765891 sameAs 2065765891 @default.
- W2065765891 citedByCount "52" @default.
- W2065765891 countsByYear W20657658912012 @default.
- W2065765891 countsByYear W20657658912013 @default.
- W2065765891 countsByYear W20657658912014 @default.
- W2065765891 countsByYear W20657658912015 @default.
- W2065765891 countsByYear W20657658912016 @default.
- W2065765891 countsByYear W20657658912017 @default.
- W2065765891 countsByYear W20657658912018 @default.
- W2065765891 countsByYear W20657658912019 @default.
- W2065765891 countsByYear W20657658912020 @default.
- W2065765891 countsByYear W20657658912021 @default.
- W2065765891 countsByYear W20657658912022 @default.
- W2065765891 countsByYear W20657658912023 @default.
- W2065765891 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2065765891 hasAuthorship W2065765891A5003736661 @default.
- W2065765891 hasAuthorship W2065765891A5020741534 @default.
- W2065765891 hasAuthorship W2065765891A5071963579 @default.
- W2065765891 hasAuthorship W2065765891A5086697164 @default.
- W2065765891 hasBestOaLocation W20657658912 @default.
- W2065765891 hasConcept C111472728 @default.
- W2065765891 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W2065765891 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W2065765891 hasConcept C2779530757 @default.
- W2065765891 hasConcept C509550671 @default.
- W2065765891 hasConcept C63882131 @default.
- W2065765891 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2065765891 hasConcept C75630572 @default.
- W2065765891 hasConcept C77805123 @default.
- W2065765891 hasConceptScore W2065765891C111472728 @default.
- W2065765891 hasConceptScore W2065765891C138885662 @default.
- W2065765891 hasConceptScore W2065765891C15744967 @default.
- W2065765891 hasConceptScore W2065765891C2779530757 @default.
- W2065765891 hasConceptScore W2065765891C509550671 @default.
- W2065765891 hasConceptScore W2065765891C63882131 @default.
- W2065765891 hasConceptScore W2065765891C71924100 @default.
- W2065765891 hasConceptScore W2065765891C75630572 @default.
- W2065765891 hasConceptScore W2065765891C77805123 @default.
- W2065765891 hasIssue "2" @default.
- W2065765891 hasLocation W20657658911 @default.
- W2065765891 hasLocation W20657658912 @default.
- W2065765891 hasOpenAccess W2065765891 @default.
- W2065765891 hasPrimaryLocation W20657658911 @default.
- W2065765891 hasRelatedWork W2044705531 @default.
- W2065765891 hasRelatedWork W2049941151 @default.
- W2065765891 hasRelatedWork W2054737930 @default.
- W2065765891 hasRelatedWork W2057535030 @default.
- W2065765891 hasRelatedWork W2071821804 @default.
- W2065765891 hasRelatedWork W2090747809 @default.
- W2065765891 hasRelatedWork W2368294344 @default.
- W2065765891 hasRelatedWork W2899084033 @default.
- W2065765891 hasRelatedWork W3015155010 @default.
- W2065765891 hasRelatedWork W3134495079 @default.
- W2065765891 hasVolume "41" @default.
- W2065765891 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2065765891 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2065765891 magId "2065765891" @default.
- W2065765891 workType "article" @default.