Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2066125069> ?p ?o ?g. }
Showing items 1 to 72 of
72
with 100 items per page.
- W2066125069 endingPage "738" @default.
- W2066125069 startingPage "738" @default.
- W2066125069 abstract "Simon Nadel and colleagues, in their randomised trial on drotrecogin alfa in children with severe sepsis (March 10, p 836),1Nadel S Goldstein B Williams MD et al.for the REsearching severe Sepsis and Organ dysfunction in children: a gLobal perspective (RESOLVE) study groupDrotrecogin alfa (activated) in children with severe sepsis: a multicentre phase III randomised controlled trial.Lancet. 2007; 369: 836-843Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (414) Google Scholar do not mention heparin. Treatment with heparins was a consistent confounder in three large trials of anticoagulant proteins for sepsis.2Bernard GR Vincent JL Laterre PF et al.for the Recombinant human protein C Worldwide Evaluation in Severe Sepsis (PROWESS) study groupEfficacy and safety of recombinant human activated protein C for severe sepsis.N Engl J Med. 2001; 344: 699-709Crossref PubMed Scopus (5036) Google Scholar, 3Abraham E Reinhart K Opal S et al.for the OPTIMIST Trial Study GroupEfficacy and safety of tifacogin (recombinant tissue factor pathway inhibitor) in severe sepsis: a randomized controlled trial.JAMA. 2003; 290: 238-247Crossref PubMed Scopus (803) Google Scholar, 4Warren BL Eid A Singer P et al.for the KyberSept Trial Study GroupHigh-dose antithrombin III in severe sepsis: a randomized controlled trial.JAMA. 2001; 286: 1869-1878Crossref PubMed Scopus (1129) Google Scholar Non-randomised heparin administration was associated with better outcome.5Polderman KH Girbes AR Drug intervention trials in sepsis: divergent results.Lancet. 2004; 363: 1721-1723Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (93) Google Scholar We would like to ask Nadel and colleagues to present the outcome in the subgroups receiving heparin versus those not.We declare that we have no conflict of interest. Simon Nadel and colleagues, in their randomised trial on drotrecogin alfa in children with severe sepsis (March 10, p 836),1Nadel S Goldstein B Williams MD et al.for the REsearching severe Sepsis and Organ dysfunction in children: a gLobal perspective (RESOLVE) study groupDrotrecogin alfa (activated) in children with severe sepsis: a multicentre phase III randomised controlled trial.Lancet. 2007; 369: 836-843Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (414) Google Scholar do not mention heparin. Treatment with heparins was a consistent confounder in three large trials of anticoagulant proteins for sepsis.2Bernard GR Vincent JL Laterre PF et al.for the Recombinant human protein C Worldwide Evaluation in Severe Sepsis (PROWESS) study groupEfficacy and safety of recombinant human activated protein C for severe sepsis.N Engl J Med. 2001; 344: 699-709Crossref PubMed Scopus (5036) Google Scholar, 3Abraham E Reinhart K Opal S et al.for the OPTIMIST Trial Study GroupEfficacy and safety of tifacogin (recombinant tissue factor pathway inhibitor) in severe sepsis: a randomized controlled trial.JAMA. 2003; 290: 238-247Crossref PubMed Scopus (803) Google Scholar, 4Warren BL Eid A Singer P et al.for the KyberSept Trial Study GroupHigh-dose antithrombin III in severe sepsis: a randomized controlled trial.JAMA. 2001; 286: 1869-1878Crossref PubMed Scopus (1129) Google Scholar Non-randomised heparin administration was associated with better outcome.5Polderman KH Girbes AR Drug intervention trials in sepsis: divergent results.Lancet. 2004; 363: 1721-1723Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (93) Google Scholar We would like to ask Nadel and colleagues to present the outcome in the subgroups receiving heparin versus those not. We declare that we have no conflict of interest. Heparin in sepsis treatment – Authors' replyChristoph Pechlaner and Michael Joannidis raise an important question about heparin being a potential confounder in our trial of activated drotrecogin alfa in children with severe sepsis. In our trial, 62% of the patients in the drotrecogin alfa and placebo arms were receiving heparin at baseline. Differences in 28-day mortality between those receiving and not receiving heparin are shown in the table. The Breslow-Day test for subgroup interaction in the baseline heparin versus no heparin groups was 0·56, indicating that there was no statistical difference between the two groups with respect to treatment group mortality rates. Full-Text PDF" @default.
- W2066125069 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2066125069 creator A5019454268 @default.
- W2066125069 creator A5028816041 @default.
- W2066125069 date "2007-09-01" @default.
- W2066125069 modified "2023-09-27" @default.
- W2066125069 title "Heparin in sepsis treatment" @default.
- W2066125069 cites W2036260951 @default.
- W2066125069 cites W2108435955 @default.
- W2066125069 cites W2115301416 @default.
- W2066125069 cites W2157199674 @default.
- W2066125069 cites W2322121630 @default.
- W2066125069 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61370-1" @default.
- W2066125069 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17765516" @default.
- W2066125069 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
- W2066125069 type Work @default.
- W2066125069 sameAs 2066125069 @default.
- W2066125069 citedByCount "0" @default.
- W2066125069 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2066125069 hasAuthorship W2066125069A5019454268 @default.
- W2066125069 hasAuthorship W2066125069A5028816041 @default.
- W2066125069 hasBestOaLocation W20661250691 @default.
- W2066125069 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
- W2066125069 hasConcept C168563851 @default.
- W2066125069 hasConcept C17744445 @default.
- W2066125069 hasConcept C177713679 @default.
- W2066125069 hasConcept C187212893 @default.
- W2066125069 hasConcept C199539241 @default.
- W2066125069 hasConcept C2777628635 @default.
- W2066125069 hasConcept C2778005785 @default.
- W2066125069 hasConcept C2778384902 @default.
- W2066125069 hasConcept C2779473830 @default.
- W2066125069 hasConcept C2994086866 @default.
- W2066125069 hasConcept C535046627 @default.
- W2066125069 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2066125069 hasConcept C83867959 @default.
- W2066125069 hasConceptScore W2066125069C126322002 @default.
- W2066125069 hasConceptScore W2066125069C168563851 @default.
- W2066125069 hasConceptScore W2066125069C17744445 @default.
- W2066125069 hasConceptScore W2066125069C177713679 @default.
- W2066125069 hasConceptScore W2066125069C187212893 @default.
- W2066125069 hasConceptScore W2066125069C199539241 @default.
- W2066125069 hasConceptScore W2066125069C2777628635 @default.
- W2066125069 hasConceptScore W2066125069C2778005785 @default.
- W2066125069 hasConceptScore W2066125069C2778384902 @default.
- W2066125069 hasConceptScore W2066125069C2779473830 @default.
- W2066125069 hasConceptScore W2066125069C2994086866 @default.
- W2066125069 hasConceptScore W2066125069C535046627 @default.
- W2066125069 hasConceptScore W2066125069C71924100 @default.
- W2066125069 hasConceptScore W2066125069C83867959 @default.
- W2066125069 hasIssue "9589" @default.
- W2066125069 hasLocation W20661250691 @default.
- W2066125069 hasLocation W20661250692 @default.
- W2066125069 hasOpenAccess W2066125069 @default.
- W2066125069 hasPrimaryLocation W20661250691 @default.
- W2066125069 hasRelatedWork W1559384899 @default.
- W2066125069 hasRelatedWork W1971537896 @default.
- W2066125069 hasRelatedWork W1990086845 @default.
- W2066125069 hasRelatedWork W2007393897 @default.
- W2066125069 hasRelatedWork W2036932947 @default.
- W2066125069 hasRelatedWork W2067262134 @default.
- W2066125069 hasRelatedWork W2079618165 @default.
- W2066125069 hasRelatedWork W2169306211 @default.
- W2066125069 hasRelatedWork W2184362486 @default.
- W2066125069 hasRelatedWork W2117165409 @default.
- W2066125069 hasVolume "370" @default.
- W2066125069 isParatext "false" @default.
- W2066125069 isRetracted "false" @default.
- W2066125069 magId "2066125069" @default.
- W2066125069 workType "article" @default.