FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2066635694> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2066635694 endingPage "677" @default.
• W2066635694 startingPage "661" @default.
• W2066635694 abstract "Where Was Moses When the Candle Went Out? Infinity, Prophecy, and Ethics in Spinoza and “Ithaca” Elizabeth S. Anker Of the many enigmatic references in Ulysses, Joyce’s allusions to Baruch Spinoza present yet another elusive and underanalyzed aspect of the novel.1 In the “Ithaca” episode, Leopold Bloom first identifies Spinoza as one of the “anapocryphal illustrious sons of the law and children of a selected or rejected race” in his discussions with Stephen (U 17.720–21). Next, Bloom lists “Thoughts from Spinoza (maroon leather)” as one of the books on the shelf in his and Molly’s bedroom (U 17.1372). Furthermore, in “Penelope,” Molly remembers Bloom tediously expounding the philosophy of Spinoza to her in the past (U 18.1115–16). These references, as well as the narrative structure of “Ithaca,” suggest significant points of correspondence between the novel and tenets of Spinoza’s philosophy, thereby raising questions about the importance of the philosopher and his work for Joyce and Ulysses.2 This essay emphasizes just two of the many components of Spinoza’s philosophy reflected in Ulysses. First, Bloom’s moments of revelation parallel the types of spiritual insight afforded to the Spinozan prophet. Both Bloom’s and Spinoza’s revelations arise through contemplation of the “infinite,” a property variously residing in nature, in textual exegesis, and in the unknowable Other. While the theories of Sigmund Freud, Jacques Lacan, Jacques Derrida, Emmanuel Levinas, and Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari have, at times, been applied to explain the nature of the “unknowable” in Ulysses,3 Spinoza’s philosophy actually offers a particularly apt and revealing frame for interpreting “Ithaca.” The inspiration experienced by Bloom and analyzed by Spinoza is fundamentally ambivalent: while it offers a source of infinite replenishment, it is paradoxically predicated upon the experience of irreparable foreclosure, the infinite void. Moreover, in Ulysses, this interdependent illumination and certain loss not only reside in the inspiration derived from the contemplation of physical matter and the literary text but also constitute the interpersonal. As such, they inform questions of ethics, which are [End Page 661] ultimately shown to require a quasi-stoical comportment of piety, endurance, and devoted care. By analyzing what may be the central epiphany in the novel, I suggest that Bloom, at the end of “Ithaca,” reconciles himself to the contradictory, dual quality of his relationship with Molly. Second, Bloom’s character is itself derived from Spinoza’s conception of the prophet. While many readers have envisioned Bloom as a Christ-like figure, the persona of an Old Testament prophet provides a more accurate analogue for Bloom. Thus, Talmudic (rather than Biblical) exegesis best pertains to the text of Ulysses.4 As in the Old Testament, Ulysses refuses a narrative of final redemption, and its glimpses of ultimate meaning are radically tenuous and uncertain, without any transcendent guarantees. Before turning strictly to “Ithaca,” it is important to note the ways in which Ulysses gives literary expression to Spinoza’s philosophy. For one, the embrace of the visceral and the body in the novel captures Spinoza’s monism—his notion of the unity of mind and body, his celebration of the corporeal, and his deprivileging of the exclusively cerebral.5 A similar validation of the emotions is present for both Joyce and Spinoza.6 Finally, Bloom’s non-combativeness, his avoidance of aggression or antagonism, parallels Spinoza’s version of stoicism. As is the case with Bloom, Spinoza describes this disposition not as a type of passivity but as an active receptivity, requiring that the individual “follow[s] the common order of nature, and obeys it, and accommodates himself to it as far as the nature of things demands” (Ethics 157). Spinoza attributes the need for such a posture to various features of existence: the fragmentary nature of human knowledge,7 our captivity to the emotions,8 the lack of purpose or teleology in nature,9 and the absence of an entirely autonomous human will.10 In “Ithaca,” as elsewhere in the novel, Bloom repeatedly acknowledges his own qualities of “passivity.”11 Additionally, apparent connections between Bloom, Spinoza, and even Joyce himself emerge with respect to Spinoza’s Jewishness. Joyce’s artistic exile..." @default.
• W2066635694 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2066635694 creator A5009021664 @default.
• W2066635694 date "2008-01-01" @default.
• W2066635694 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2066635694 title "Where Was Moses When the Candle Went Out?: Infinity, Prophecy, and Ethics in Spinoza and “Ithaca”" @default.
• W2066635694 cites W1492746059 @default.
• W2066635694 cites W1498782825 @default.
• W2066635694 cites W1536597499 @default.
• W2066635694 cites W1561739433 @default.
• W2066635694 cites W2007286956 @default.
• W2066635694 cites W2037924170 @default.
• W2066635694 cites W2087042849 @default.
• W2066635694 cites W2315163088 @default.
• W2066635694 cites W593697089 @default.
• W2066635694 cites W630585891 @default.
• W2066635694 doi "https://doi.org/10.1353/jjq.0.0002" @default.
• W2066635694 hasPublicationYear "2008" @default.
• W2066635694 type Work @default.
• W2066635694 sameAs 2066635694 @default.
• W2066635694 citedByCount "3" @default.
• W2066635694 countsByYear W20666356942012 @default.
• W2066635694 countsByYear W20666356942014 @default.
• W2066635694 countsByYear W20666356942020 @default.
• W2066635694 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2066635694 hasAuthorship W2066635694A5009021664 @default.
• W2066635694 hasConcept C124952713 @default.
• W2066635694 hasConcept C134306372 @default.
• W2066635694 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
• W2066635694 hasConcept C142362112 @default.
• W2066635694 hasConcept C178288346 @default.
• W2066635694 hasConcept C199033989 @default.
• W2066635694 hasConcept C27206212 @default.
• W2066635694 hasConcept C2776405206 @default.
• W2066635694 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2066635694 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
• W2066635694 hasConcept C52119013 @default.
• W2066635694 hasConcept C7321624 @default.
• W2066635694 hasConcept C95457728 @default.
• W2066635694 hasConceptScore W2066635694C124952713 @default.
• W2066635694 hasConceptScore W2066635694C134306372 @default.
• W2066635694 hasConceptScore W2066635694C138885662 @default.
• W2066635694 hasConceptScore W2066635694C142362112 @default.
• W2066635694 hasConceptScore W2066635694C178288346 @default.
• W2066635694 hasConceptScore W2066635694C199033989 @default.
• W2066635694 hasConceptScore W2066635694C27206212 @default.
• W2066635694 hasConceptScore W2066635694C2776405206 @default.
• W2066635694 hasConceptScore W2066635694C33923547 @default.
• W2066635694 hasConceptScore W2066635694C41895202 @default.
• W2066635694 hasConceptScore W2066635694C52119013 @default.
• W2066635694 hasConceptScore W2066635694C7321624 @default.
• W2066635694 hasConceptScore W2066635694C95457728 @default.
• W2066635694 hasIssue "4" @default.
• W2066635694 hasLocation W20666356941 @default.
• W2066635694 hasOpenAccess W2066635694 @default.
• W2066635694 hasPrimaryLocation W20666356941 @default.
• W2066635694 hasRelatedWork W1545372490 @default.
• W2066635694 hasRelatedWork W2017160085 @default.
• W2066635694 hasRelatedWork W203454578 @default.
• W2066635694 hasRelatedWork W2059206556 @default.
• W2066635694 hasRelatedWork W2083751040 @default.
• W2066635694 hasRelatedWork W2326033517 @default.
• W2066635694 hasRelatedWork W2372323440 @default.
• W2066635694 hasRelatedWork W2386113955 @default.
• W2066635694 hasRelatedWork W2748952813 @default.
• W2066635694 hasRelatedWork W4282584235 @default.
• W2066635694 hasVolume "44" @default.
• W2066635694 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2066635694 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2066635694 magId "2066635694" @default.
• W2066635694 workType "article" @default.