FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2066784064> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2066784064 endingPage "878" @default.
• W2066784064 startingPage "863" @default.
• W2066784064 abstract "The rotamer approximation states that protein side-chain conformations can be described well using a finite set of rotational isomers. This approximation is often applied in the context of computational protein design and structure prediction to reduce the complexity of structural sampling. It is an effective way of reducing the structure space to the most relevant conformations. However, the appropriateness of rotamers for sampling structure space does not imply that a rotamer-based energy landscape preserves any of the properties of the true continuous energy landscape. Specifically, because the energy of a van der Waals interaction can be very sensitive to small changes in atomic separation, meaningful van der Waals energies are particularly difficult to calculate from rotamer-based structures. This presents a problem for computational protein design, where the total energy of a given structure is often represented as a sum of precalculated rigid rotamer self and pair contributions. A common way of addressing this issue is to modify the van der Waals function to reduce its sensitivity to atomic position, but excessive modification may result in a strongly nonphysical potential. Although many different van der Waals modifications have been used in protein design, little is known about which performs best, and why. In this paper, we study 10 ways of computing van der Waals energies under the rotamer approximation, representing four general classes, and compare their performance using a variety of metrics relevant to protein design and native-sequence repacking calculations. Scaling van der Waals radii by anywhere from 85 to 95% gives the best performance. Linearizing and capping the repulsive portion of the potential can give additional improvement, which comes primarily from getting rid of unrealistically large clash energies. On the other hand, continuously minimizing individual rotamer pairs prior to evaluating their interaction works acceptably in native-sequence repacking, but fails in protein design. Additionally, we show that the problem of predicting relevant van der Waals energies from rotamer-based structures is strongly nonpairwise decomposable and hence further modifications of the potential are unlikely to give significant improvement. Proteins 2007. © 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc." @default.
• W2066784064 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2066784064 creator A5031865026 @default.
• W2066784064 creator A5068168068 @default.
• W2066784064 creator A5078947409 @default.
• W2066784064 date "2007-06-06" @default.
• W2066784064 modified "2023-10-17" @default.
• W2066784064 title "Computing van der Waals energies in the context of the rotamer approximation" @default.
• W2066784064 cites W1498124562 @default.
• W2066784064 cites W1574312817 @default.
• W2066784064 cites W1969644422 @default.
• W2066784064 cites W1971500863 @default.
• W2066784064 cites W1972728295 @default.
• W2066784064 cites W1974117482 @default.
• W2066784064 cites W1975760681 @default.
• W2066784064 cites W1980745499 @default.
• W2066784064 cites W1985907120 @default.
• W2066784064 cites W1992426410 @default.
• W2066784064 cites W1992739911 @default.
• W2066784064 cites W1995824897 @default.
• W2066784064 cites W2008852962 @default.
• W2066784064 cites W2011470242 @default.
• W2066784064 cites W2027189612 @default.
• W2066784064 cites W2028843689 @default.
• W2066784064 cites W2037511678 @default.
• W2066784064 cites W2039388179 @default.
• W2066784064 cites W2043010716 @default.
• W2066784064 cites W2049659492 @default.
• W2066784064 cites W2078362683 @default.
• W2066784064 cites W2082221689 @default.
• W2066784064 cites W2085277871 @default.
• W2066784064 cites W2086099509 @default.
• W2066784064 cites W2089052645 @default.
• W2066784064 cites W2103622571 @default.
• W2066784064 cites W2109231323 @default.
• W2066784064 cites W2116214348 @default.
• W2066784064 cites W2134731229 @default.
• W2066784064 cites W2135815512 @default.
• W2066784064 cites W2140248032 @default.
• W2066784064 cites W2141920771 @default.
• W2066784064 cites W2145440823 @default.
• W2066784064 cites W2150155770 @default.
• W2066784064 cites W2150766399 @default.
• W2066784064 cites W2154031461 @default.
• W2066784064 cites W2162166182 @default.
• W2066784064 cites W2164130591 @default.
• W2066784064 cites W2166317516 @default.
• W2066784064 cites W2172114588 @default.
• W2066784064 cites W2324653063 @default.
• W2066784064 cites W3020957661 @default.
• W2066784064 doi "https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.21470" @default.
• W2066784064 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17554777" @default.
• W2066784064 hasPublicationYear "2007" @default.
• W2066784064 type Work @default.
• W2066784064 sameAs 2066784064 @default.
• W2066784064 citedByCount "23" @default.
• W2066784064 countsByYear W20667840642012 @default.
• W2066784064 countsByYear W20667840642013 @default.
• W2066784064 countsByYear W20667840642014 @default.
• W2066784064 countsByYear W20667840642015 @default.
• W2066784064 countsByYear W20667840642016 @default.
• W2066784064 countsByYear W20667840642017 @default.
• W2066784064 countsByYear W20667840642022 @default.
• W2066784064 countsByYear W20667840642023 @default.
• W2066784064 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2066784064 hasAuthorship W2066784064A5031865026 @default.
• W2066784064 hasAuthorship W2066784064A5068168068 @default.
• W2066784064 hasAuthorship W2066784064A5078947409 @default.
• W2066784064 hasConcept C10803110 @default.
• W2066784064 hasConcept C121332964 @default.
• W2066784064 hasConcept C121864883 @default.
• W2066784064 hasConcept C126061179 @default.
• W2066784064 hasConcept C147597530 @default.
• W2066784064 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W2066784064 hasConcept C185592680 @default.
• W2066784064 hasConcept C18705241 @default.
• W2066784064 hasConcept C2524010 @default.
• W2066784064 hasConcept C2779343474 @default.
• W2066784064 hasConcept C32909587 @default.
• W2066784064 hasConcept C33267525 @default.
• W2066784064 hasConcept C33923547 @default.
• W2066784064 hasConcept C62520636 @default.
• W2066784064 hasConcept C73683733 @default.
• W2066784064 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2066784064 hasConcept C99844830 @default.
• W2066784064 hasConceptScore W2066784064C10803110 @default.
• W2066784064 hasConceptScore W2066784064C121332964 @default.
• W2066784064 hasConceptScore W2066784064C121864883 @default.
• W2066784064 hasConceptScore W2066784064C126061179 @default.
• W2066784064 hasConceptScore W2066784064C147597530 @default.
• W2066784064 hasConceptScore W2066784064C151730666 @default.
• W2066784064 hasConceptScore W2066784064C185592680 @default.
• W2066784064 hasConceptScore W2066784064C18705241 @default.
• W2066784064 hasConceptScore W2066784064C2524010 @default.
• W2066784064 hasConceptScore W2066784064C2779343474 @default.
• W2066784064 hasConceptScore W2066784064C32909587 @default.
• W2066784064 hasConceptScore W2066784064C33267525 @default.
• W2066784064 hasConceptScore W2066784064C33923547 @default.

• next