FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2066841025> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2066841025 endingPage "786" @default.
• W2066841025 startingPage "779" @default.
• W2066841025 abstract "Background and study aims: An ideal treatment for choledocholithiasis in the laparoscopic era has not been established. The objective of this study was to elucidate whether a treatment strategy of performing intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) during laparascopic cholecystectomy (when choledocholithiasis is confirmed by intraoperative cholangiography) is better for patients with suspected common bile duct stones than the current strategy (preoperative ERCP followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy). Patients and methods: This was a prospective randomized study to evaluate which of these two approaches was most benefit- and cost-effective for patients with intermediate risk of choledocholithiasis. Patients underwent either preoperative ERCP followed by a laparoscopic cholecystectomy a few weeks later (the “preoperative ERCP” group) or intraoperative ERCP (the “intraoperative ERCP” group). Intraoperative ERCP was performed using the rendezvous technique. Results: There were 64 patients in the preoperative ERCP group and 59 patients in the intraoperative ERCP group. The demographic and clinical characteristics of the two groups were similar, except that the bilirubin and gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) levels and the number of patients treated on an inpatient basis were higher in the preoperative ERCP group. Success rates were similar (96.6 % in the preoperative ERCP group vs. 90.2 % in the intraoperative ERCP group in the per-protocol study). Total morbidity, post-ERCP morbidity, and post-ERCP acute pancreatitis rates were higher in the preoperative ERCP group, but there were no differences between the two groups in the frequency of residual common bile duct stones, the conversion rate to open cholecystectomy, or surgical morbidity. The length of hospital stay and costs were lower in the intraoperative ERCP group despite the longer surgical times in this group. Univariate analysis did not find any relationship between morbidity and total bilirubin or GGT. Logistic regression analysis confirmed that morbidity was related only to the treatment group and the time spent in the operating room: the relative risk (RR) was 4.37 for morbidity and 1.015 for the time spent in the operating room); the RR for papillotomy was 5.49. Conclusions: Both treatment approaches were equally effective but the intraoperative ERCP group had less morbidity, a shorter hospital stay, and reduced costs. The lower morbidity in the intraoperative ERCP group resulted from the lower rate of papillotomy and lower rates of post-ERCP pancreatitis and cholecystitis. Total morbidity was principally related to the type of treatment approach used." @default.
• W2066841025 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2066841025 creator A5003145719 @default.
• W2066841025 creator A5005510493 @default.
• W2066841025 creator A5007826033 @default.
• W2066841025 creator A5011716973 @default.
• W2066841025 creator A5021751391 @default.
• W2066841025 creator A5029679547 @default.
• W2066841025 creator A5070051103 @default.
• W2066841025 creator A5070230016 @default.
• W2066841025 creator A5071429767 @default.
• W2066841025 creator A5076873552 @default.
• W2066841025 creator A5080782196 @default.
• W2066841025 creator A5085945471 @default.
• W2066841025 creator A5091339573 @default.
• W2066841025 date "2006-08-01" @default.
• W2066841025 modified "2023-10-10" @default.
• W2066841025 title "Two-stage treatment with preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) compared with single-stage treatment with intraoperative ERCP for patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis with possible choledocholithiasis" @default.
• W2066841025 doi "https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2006-944617" @default.
• W2066841025 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17001567" @default.
• W2066841025 hasPublicationYear "2006" @default.
• W2066841025 type Work @default.
• W2066841025 sameAs 2066841025 @default.
• W2066841025 citedByCount "104" @default.
• W2066841025 countsByYear W20668410252012 @default.
• W2066841025 countsByYear W20668410252013 @default.
• W2066841025 countsByYear W20668410252014 @default.
• W2066841025 countsByYear W20668410252015 @default.
• W2066841025 countsByYear W20668410252016 @default.
• W2066841025 countsByYear W20668410252017 @default.
• W2066841025 countsByYear W20668410252018 @default.
• W2066841025 countsByYear W20668410252019 @default.
• W2066841025 countsByYear W20668410252020 @default.
• W2066841025 countsByYear W20668410252021 @default.
• W2066841025 countsByYear W20668410252022 @default.
• W2066841025 countsByYear W20668410252023 @default.
• W2066841025 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2066841025 hasAuthorship W2066841025A5003145719 @default.
• W2066841025 hasAuthorship W2066841025A5005510493 @default.
• W2066841025 hasAuthorship W2066841025A5007826033 @default.
• W2066841025 hasAuthorship W2066841025A5011716973 @default.
• W2066841025 hasAuthorship W2066841025A5021751391 @default.
• W2066841025 hasAuthorship W2066841025A5029679547 @default.
• W2066841025 hasAuthorship W2066841025A5070051103 @default.
• W2066841025 hasAuthorship W2066841025A5070230016 @default.
• W2066841025 hasAuthorship W2066841025A5071429767 @default.
• W2066841025 hasAuthorship W2066841025A5076873552 @default.
• W2066841025 hasAuthorship W2066841025A5080782196 @default.
• W2066841025 hasAuthorship W2066841025A5085945471 @default.
• W2066841025 hasAuthorship W2066841025A5091339573 @default.
• W2066841025 hasConcept C141071460 @default.
• W2066841025 hasConcept C146357865 @default.
• W2066841025 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W2066841025 hasConcept C2775967933 @default.
• W2066841025 hasConcept C2776641081 @default.
• W2066841025 hasConcept C2776884468 @default.
• W2066841025 hasConcept C2777683338 @default.
• W2066841025 hasConcept C2778444009 @default.
• W2066841025 hasConcept C2779777945 @default.
• W2066841025 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2066841025 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2066841025 hasConceptScore W2066841025C141071460 @default.
• W2066841025 hasConceptScore W2066841025C146357865 @default.
• W2066841025 hasConceptScore W2066841025C151730666 @default.
• W2066841025 hasConceptScore W2066841025C2775967933 @default.
• W2066841025 hasConceptScore W2066841025C2776641081 @default.
• W2066841025 hasConceptScore W2066841025C2776884468 @default.
• W2066841025 hasConceptScore W2066841025C2777683338 @default.
• W2066841025 hasConceptScore W2066841025C2778444009 @default.
• W2066841025 hasConceptScore W2066841025C2779777945 @default.
• W2066841025 hasConceptScore W2066841025C71924100 @default.
• W2066841025 hasConceptScore W2066841025C86803240 @default.
• W2066841025 hasIssue "8" @default.
• W2066841025 hasLocation W20668410251 @default.
• W2066841025 hasLocation W20668410252 @default.
• W2066841025 hasOpenAccess W2066841025 @default.
• W2066841025 hasPrimaryLocation W20668410251 @default.
• W2066841025 hasRelatedWork W1985058313 @default.
• W2066841025 hasRelatedWork W2001632096 @default.
• W2066841025 hasRelatedWork W2010933410 @default.
• W2066841025 hasRelatedWork W2062139387 @default.
• W2066841025 hasRelatedWork W2064939263 @default.
• W2066841025 hasRelatedWork W2069265186 @default.
• W2066841025 hasRelatedWork W2161007210 @default.
• W2066841025 hasRelatedWork W2169319670 @default.
• W2066841025 hasRelatedWork W3030980101 @default.
• W2066841025 hasRelatedWork W4297818612 @default.
• W2066841025 hasVolume "38" @default.
• W2066841025 isParatext "false" @default.
• W2066841025 isRetracted "false" @default.
• W2066841025 magId "2066841025" @default.
• W2066841025 workType "article" @default.