Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2066904356> ?p ?o ?g. }
- W2066904356 endingPage "848" @default.
- W2066904356 startingPage "840" @default.
- W2066904356 abstract "Purpose This study applied automatic feature detection on cine–magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) liver images in order to provide a prospective comparison between MRI-guided and surrogate-based tracking methods for motion-compensated liver radiation therapy. Methods and Materials In a population of 30 subjects (5 volunteers plus 25 patients), 2 oblique sagittal slices were acquired across the liver at high temporal resolution. An algorithm based on scale invariant feature transform (SIFT) was used to extract and track multiple features throughout the image sequence. The position of abdominal markers was also measured directly from the image series, and the internal motion of each feature was quantified through multiparametric analysis. Surrogate-based tumor tracking with a state-of-the-art external/internal correlation model was simulated. The geometrical tracking error was measured, and its correlation with external motion parameters was also investigated. Finally, the potential gain in tracking accuracy relying on MRI guidance was quantified as a function of the maximum allowed tracking error. Results An average of 45 features was extracted for each subject across the whole liver. The multi-parametric motion analysis reported relevant inter- and intrasubject variability, highlighting the value of patient-specific and spatially-distributed measurements. Surrogate-based tracking errors (relative to the motion amplitude) were were in the range 7% to 23% (1.02-3.57mm) and were significantly influenced by external motion parameters. The gain of MRI guidance compared to surrogate-based motion tracking was larger than 30% in 50% of the subjects when considering a 1.5-mm tracking error tolerance. Conclusions Automatic feature detection applied to cine-MRI allows detailed liver motion description to be obtained. Such information was used to quantify the performance of surrogate-based tracking methods and to provide a prospective comparison with respect to MRI-guided radiation therapy, which could support the definition of patient-specific optimal treatment strategies. This study applied automatic feature detection on cine–magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) liver images in order to provide a prospective comparison between MRI-guided and surrogate-based tracking methods for motion-compensated liver radiation therapy. In a population of 30 subjects (5 volunteers plus 25 patients), 2 oblique sagittal slices were acquired across the liver at high temporal resolution. An algorithm based on scale invariant feature transform (SIFT) was used to extract and track multiple features throughout the image sequence. The position of abdominal markers was also measured directly from the image series, and the internal motion of each feature was quantified through multiparametric analysis. Surrogate-based tumor tracking with a state-of-the-art external/internal correlation model was simulated. The geometrical tracking error was measured, and its correlation with external motion parameters was also investigated. Finally, the potential gain in tracking accuracy relying on MRI guidance was quantified as a function of the maximum allowed tracking error. An average of 45 features was extracted for each subject across the whole liver. The multi-parametric motion analysis reported relevant inter- and intrasubject variability, highlighting the value of patient-specific and spatially-distributed measurements. Surrogate-based tracking errors (relative to the motion amplitude) were were in the range 7% to 23% (1.02-3.57mm) and were significantly influenced by external motion parameters. The gain of MRI guidance compared to surrogate-based motion tracking was larger than 30% in 50% of the subjects when considering a 1.5-mm tracking error tolerance. Automatic feature detection applied to cine-MRI allows detailed liver motion description to be obtained. Such information was used to quantify the performance of surrogate-based tracking methods and to provide a prospective comparison with respect to MRI-guided radiation therapy, which could support the definition of patient-specific optimal treatment strategies." @default.
- W2066904356 created "2016-06-24" @default.
- W2066904356 creator A5000570208 @default.
- W2066904356 creator A5007923013 @default.
- W2066904356 creator A5009782102 @default.
- W2066904356 creator A5020595951 @default.
- W2066904356 creator A5037185389 @default.
- W2066904356 creator A5067850637 @default.
- W2066904356 creator A5083196840 @default.
- W2066904356 date "2015-03-01" @default.
- W2066904356 modified "2023-10-07" @default.
- W2066904356 title "Magnetic Resonance Imaging–Guided versus Surrogate-Based Motion Tracking in Liver Radiation Therapy: A Prospective Comparative Study" @default.
- W2066904356 cites W1897507705 @default.
- W2066904356 cites W1970594160 @default.
- W2066904356 cites W1978250545 @default.
- W2066904356 cites W1979012022 @default.
- W2066904356 cites W1980020889 @default.
- W2066904356 cites W1982265085 @default.
- W2066904356 cites W1983138662 @default.
- W2066904356 cites W1989922570 @default.
- W2066904356 cites W1989985079 @default.
- W2066904356 cites W1996259652 @default.
- W2066904356 cites W1996470365 @default.
- W2066904356 cites W1997838860 @default.
- W2066904356 cites W1999438941 @default.
- W2066904356 cites W2001352851 @default.
- W2066904356 cites W2003320146 @default.
- W2066904356 cites W2012350225 @default.
- W2066904356 cites W2018338559 @default.
- W2066904356 cites W2019605381 @default.
- W2066904356 cites W2024803002 @default.
- W2066904356 cites W2029413773 @default.
- W2066904356 cites W2034511245 @default.
- W2066904356 cites W2037189699 @default.
- W2066904356 cites W2040357326 @default.
- W2066904356 cites W2041332468 @default.
- W2066904356 cites W2050335127 @default.
- W2066904356 cites W2052617049 @default.
- W2066904356 cites W2057186248 @default.
- W2066904356 cites W2060484971 @default.
- W2066904356 cites W2061096909 @default.
- W2066904356 cites W2061176254 @default.
- W2066904356 cites W2070976283 @default.
- W2066904356 cites W2079474469 @default.
- W2066904356 cites W2090067210 @default.
- W2066904356 cites W2096210342 @default.
- W2066904356 cites W2109462047 @default.
- W2066904356 cites W2121562131 @default.
- W2066904356 cites W2127480863 @default.
- W2066904356 cites W2130068374 @default.
- W2066904356 cites W2145140579 @default.
- W2066904356 cites W2146905754 @default.
- W2066904356 cites W2167221711 @default.
- W2066904356 cites W2171329552 @default.
- W2066904356 doi "https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.12.013" @default.
- W2066904356 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25752399" @default.
- W2066904356 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
- W2066904356 type Work @default.
- W2066904356 sameAs 2066904356 @default.
- W2066904356 citedByCount "41" @default.
- W2066904356 countsByYear W20669043562015 @default.
- W2066904356 countsByYear W20669043562016 @default.
- W2066904356 countsByYear W20669043562017 @default.
- W2066904356 countsByYear W20669043562018 @default.
- W2066904356 countsByYear W20669043562019 @default.
- W2066904356 countsByYear W20669043562020 @default.
- W2066904356 countsByYear W20669043562021 @default.
- W2066904356 countsByYear W20669043562022 @default.
- W2066904356 countsByYear W20669043562023 @default.
- W2066904356 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
- W2066904356 hasAuthorship W2066904356A5000570208 @default.
- W2066904356 hasAuthorship W2066904356A5007923013 @default.
- W2066904356 hasAuthorship W2066904356A5009782102 @default.
- W2066904356 hasAuthorship W2066904356A5020595951 @default.
- W2066904356 hasAuthorship W2066904356A5037185389 @default.
- W2066904356 hasAuthorship W2066904356A5067850637 @default.
- W2066904356 hasAuthorship W2066904356A5083196840 @default.
- W2066904356 hasBestOaLocation W20669043562 @default.
- W2066904356 hasConcept C104114177 @default.
- W2066904356 hasConcept C126838900 @default.
- W2066904356 hasConcept C138885662 @default.
- W2066904356 hasConcept C143409427 @default.
- W2066904356 hasConcept C153180895 @default.
- W2066904356 hasConcept C154945302 @default.
- W2066904356 hasConcept C15744967 @default.
- W2066904356 hasConcept C19417346 @default.
- W2066904356 hasConcept C2775936607 @default.
- W2066904356 hasConcept C2776401178 @default.
- W2066904356 hasConcept C2987395694 @default.
- W2066904356 hasConcept C2989005 @default.
- W2066904356 hasConcept C31972630 @default.
- W2066904356 hasConcept C41008148 @default.
- W2066904356 hasConcept C41895202 @default.
- W2066904356 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
- W2066904356 hasConcept C95020103 @default.
- W2066904356 hasConceptScore W2066904356C104114177 @default.
- W2066904356 hasConceptScore W2066904356C126838900 @default.
- W2066904356 hasConceptScore W2066904356C138885662 @default.