FRINK Linked Data Fragments server

Matches in SemOpenAlex for { <https://semopenalex.org/work/W2067374522> ?p ?o ?g. }

• W2067374522 endingPage "185" @default.
• W2067374522 startingPage "185" @default.
• W2067374522 abstract "The association between regional norms of clinical practice and appropriateness of care is incompletely understood. Understanding regional patterns of care across diseases might optimize implementation of programs like Choosing Wisely, an ongoing campaign to decrease wasteful medical expenditures.To determine whether regional rates of inappropriate prostate and breast cancer imaging were associated.Retrospective cohort study using the the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare linked database. We identified patients diagnosed from 2004 to 2007 with low-risk prostate (clinical stage T1c/T2a; Gleason score, ≤6; and prostate-specific antigen level, <10 ng/mL) or breast cancer (in situ, stage I, or stage II disease), based on Choosing Wisely definitions.In a hospital referral region (HRR)-level analysis, our dependent variable was HRR-level imaging rate among patients with low-risk prostate cancer. Our independent variable was HRR-level imaging rate among patients with low-risk breast cancer. In a subsequent patient-level analysis we used multivariable logistic regression to model prostate cancer imaging as a function of regional breast cancer imaging and vice versa.We identified 9219 men with prostate cancer and 30,398 women with breast cancer residing in 84 HRRs. We found high rates of inappropriate imaging for both prostate cancer (44.4%) and breast cancer (41.8%). In the first, second, third, and fourth quartiles of breast cancer imaging, inappropriate prostate cancer imaging was 34.2%, 44.6%, 41.1%, and 56.4%, respectively. In the first, second, third, and fourth quartiles of prostate cancer imaging, inappropriate breast cancer imaging was 38.1%, 38.4%, 43.8%, and 45.7%, respectively. At the HRR level, inappropriate prostate cancer imaging rates were associated with inappropriate breast cancer imaging rates (ρ = 0.35; P < .01). At the patient level, a man with low-risk prostate cancer had odds ratios (95% CIs) of 1.72 (1.12-2.65), 1.19 (0.78-1.81), or 1.76 (1.15-2.70) for undergoing inappropriate prostate imaging if he lived in an HRR in the fourth, third, or second quartiles, respectively, of inappropriate breast cancer imaging, compared with the lowest quartile.At a regional level, there is an association between inappropriate prostate and breast cancer imaging rates. This finding suggests the existence of a regional-level propensity for inappropriate imaging utilization, which may be considered by policymakers seeking to improve quality of care and reduce health care spending in high-utilization areas." @default.
• W2067374522 created "2016-06-24" @default.
• W2067374522 creator A5001974421 @default.
• W2067374522 creator A5031832642 @default.
• W2067374522 creator A5037951527 @default.
• W2067374522 creator A5061395570 @default.
• W2067374522 creator A5071290512 @default.
• W2067374522 creator A5078289544 @default.
• W2067374522 creator A5087821944 @default.
• W2067374522 date "2015-05-01" @default.
• W2067374522 modified "2023-10-16" @default.
• W2067374522 title "Regional-Level Correlations in Inappropriate Imaging Rates for Prostate and Breast Cancers" @default.
• W2067374522 cites W1484153347 @default.
• W2067374522 cites W1678840505 @default.
• W2067374522 cites W1963622760 @default.
• W2067374522 cites W1991601878 @default.
• W2067374522 cites W1994323476 @default.
• W2067374522 cites W2014516834 @default.
• W2067374522 cites W2021514695 @default.
• W2067374522 cites W2031705387 @default.
• W2067374522 cites W2033052951 @default.
• W2067374522 cites W2043128333 @default.
• W2067374522 cites W2050056063 @default.
• W2067374522 cites W2054818307 @default.
• W2067374522 cites W2057780602 @default.
• W2067374522 cites W2065639724 @default.
• W2067374522 cites W2066451713 @default.
• W2067374522 cites W2070251390 @default.
• W2067374522 cites W2070711411 @default.
• W2067374522 cites W2072545903 @default.
• W2067374522 cites W2075051482 @default.
• W2067374522 cites W2076776261 @default.
• W2067374522 cites W2079786582 @default.
• W2067374522 cites W2085042508 @default.
• W2067374522 cites W2099816060 @default.
• W2067374522 cites W2119305996 @default.
• W2067374522 cites W2119642155 @default.
• W2067374522 cites W2124714703 @default.
• W2067374522 cites W2139010326 @default.
• W2067374522 cites W2139140245 @default.
• W2067374522 cites W2139770811 @default.
• W2067374522 cites W2151443489 @default.
• W2067374522 doi "https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.37" @default.
• W2067374522 hasPubMedCentralId "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/4707944" @default.
• W2067374522 hasPubMedId "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26181021" @default.
• W2067374522 hasPublicationYear "2015" @default.
• W2067374522 type Work @default.
• W2067374522 sameAs 2067374522 @default.
• W2067374522 citedByCount "49" @default.
• W2067374522 countsByYear W20673745222015 @default.
• W2067374522 countsByYear W20673745222016 @default.
• W2067374522 countsByYear W20673745222017 @default.
• W2067374522 countsByYear W20673745222018 @default.
• W2067374522 countsByYear W20673745222019 @default.
• W2067374522 countsByYear W20673745222020 @default.
• W2067374522 countsByYear W20673745222021 @default.
• W2067374522 countsByYear W20673745222022 @default.
• W2067374522 countsByYear W20673745222023 @default.
• W2067374522 crossrefType "journal-article" @default.
• W2067374522 hasAuthorship W2067374522A5001974421 @default.
• W2067374522 hasAuthorship W2067374522A5031832642 @default.
• W2067374522 hasAuthorship W2067374522A5037951527 @default.
• W2067374522 hasAuthorship W2067374522A5061395570 @default.
• W2067374522 hasAuthorship W2067374522A5071290512 @default.
• W2067374522 hasAuthorship W2067374522A5078289544 @default.
• W2067374522 hasAuthorship W2067374522A5087821944 @default.
• W2067374522 hasBestOaLocation W20673745221 @default.
• W2067374522 hasConcept C107130276 @default.
• W2067374522 hasConcept C121608353 @default.
• W2067374522 hasConcept C126322002 @default.
• W2067374522 hasConcept C143998085 @default.
• W2067374522 hasConcept C146357865 @default.
• W2067374522 hasConcept C151730666 @default.
• W2067374522 hasConcept C151956035 @default.
• W2067374522 hasConcept C167135981 @default.
• W2067374522 hasConcept C2776235491 @default.
• W2067374522 hasConcept C2777432617 @default.
• W2067374522 hasConcept C2778527826 @default.
• W2067374522 hasConcept C2780192828 @default.
• W2067374522 hasConcept C2780472235 @default.
• W2067374522 hasConcept C44249647 @default.
• W2067374522 hasConcept C530470458 @default.
• W2067374522 hasConcept C68443243 @default.
• W2067374522 hasConcept C71924100 @default.
• W2067374522 hasConcept C86803240 @default.
• W2067374522 hasConceptScore W2067374522C107130276 @default.
• W2067374522 hasConceptScore W2067374522C121608353 @default.
• W2067374522 hasConceptScore W2067374522C126322002 @default.
• W2067374522 hasConceptScore W2067374522C143998085 @default.
• W2067374522 hasConceptScore W2067374522C146357865 @default.
• W2067374522 hasConceptScore W2067374522C151730666 @default.
• W2067374522 hasConceptScore W2067374522C151956035 @default.
• W2067374522 hasConceptScore W2067374522C167135981 @default.
• W2067374522 hasConceptScore W2067374522C2776235491 @default.
• W2067374522 hasConceptScore W2067374522C2777432617 @default.
• W2067374522 hasConceptScore W2067374522C2778527826 @default.
• W2067374522 hasConceptScore W2067374522C2780192828 @default.
• W2067374522 hasConceptScore W2067374522C2780472235 @default.

• next